User talk:NNU-10-24100116
Welcome students from Nanjing Normal University
[edit]1, Hello. Are you a student at Nanjing Normal University? If you are I want to say hello.
2, My name is Anna. I live in Haikou, Hainan. I come from Canada.
3, I can help you if you need.
4, Don't worry. Be brave. You can write. No problem.
Some good things to help you:
- 1, Look at other articles. See how they organize it. Copy the style.
- 2, Use the information you get for your article, and write it in your words.
- 3, Don't use baike. It is not professionally written.
- 4, Put this at the end of the sentences or paragraphs to show where the information comes from:
- <ref>example-website.com</ref>
- 5, Put this at the bottom of your article:
- ==References==
- {{reflist}}
You can write to me here: Send me a message
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Those brilliant things the guys gave to me
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
A tag has been placed on Those brilliant things the guys gave to me, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ratibgreat (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Those brilliant things the guys gave to me has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ansuman (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Test
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with the page Those brilliant things the guys gave to me on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.-ansuman (talk) 03:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
|
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Link to your article when you communicate. Like this:
|
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Those brilliant things the guys gave to me
[edit]Hello, for Those brilliant things the guys gave to me references must be to reliable websites or books, unlike Wikipedia which counts as unreliable for our referencing purposes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)