User talk:NDCompuGeek/archive-2007 August
This is an archive of past discussions with User:NDCompuGeek. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The WikiProject North Dakota Newsletter - Issue 3 - August 2007
The WikiProject North Dakota Newsletter Issue 3 - August 2007 |
|
News The Grand Forks article is a great example to follow when working on other city articles, particularly those about North Dakota cities. We would be very well off if our other major city articles were similar to the Grand Forks article. Keep the Grand Forks article bookmarked and refer to its structure and style when you work on similar articles. ---New assessment parameter--- The importance of each article is gauged as either Top, High, Mid, or Low. Since "importance" is a rather subjective term, some WPND members are trying to come up with a general set of guidelines. Check out this thread on the WPND talk page to see proposals and to share your own opinions of what is and isn't "important" in the state. | |
Please help to improve and expand these articles which were recently added to the WPND project: | |
The WikiProject North Dakota newsletter is a work in progress so please share your ideas about how the newsletter can be improved. |
This newsletter has been delivered to you by --MatthewUND(talk) 00:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification
Just a super quick note, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 21 is out and can be downloaded at the usual places (if you've forgotten, WikipediaWeekly.com works wonders. -- Tawkerbot 01:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Wandalstouring 09:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
New and interested
I am EVERY new and wet behind the ears to this wonderfully growing world of WIKI. I would love to be a part of this fast pace, very wide spread community but do not know where to begin. Any advice on how to start, where to begin and what to do would be great. I am very much into computers. I am currently working on my 3rd degree a MS in info security and would love to get my PH D one day in Computer Forensics, that fascinates me so maybe somethings down that line would be goods for me, anything to do with animals or helping others (community services) ect. You point I will follow!
--216.27.87.135 18:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
See I cannot even figure out why my signature did not show up, anyway my screen name is mchapman13 my email is melissa.chapman @ tgnet . net feel free to contact me directly to provide any advice on getting me started.
- → reply on users talk page
adoption
I got your adoption invite,Thanks I would love to be adopted. Now how do I except? Do I just add the tag {{adoptee|Adopter}} to my page?
- →nowiki tags added by editor for clarity and to remove template usage. - NDCompuGeek (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of 840th Air Division, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://ranger95.com/airforce/af_divisions/840th_ad.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 10:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, CSBot catches about 100 copyvios per day— but there is a cost to pay: some amount of false positive that require good faith authors to justify and remove tags. Most people agree it's a small price to pay, but it's still annoying when it happens to one's own articles. :-) — Coren (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 01:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Request for assistance
As someone with whom I have reviewed or worked with on an article or talk page, I humbly request your assistance in reviewing the Aggie Bonfire page for Featured Article status. Any/all constructive input is welcomed and appreciated on the FAC nomination page, but please read the instructions for reviewing before you make a comment. Thanks in advance for your assistance. — BQZip01 — talk 05:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback. Any chance you could copy your comments into the FAC nomination page and give us a Support nod? — BQZip01 — talk 04:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, Texas A&M has an excellent veteran's affairs department and would likely be very happy to look at your admissions package. My brother is there now working on his Master's degree. I can ask him to look into it if you really are interested. — BQZip01 — talk 04:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
United States WikiProjects
Just curious why you moved the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/United States WikiProjects into Template:US-related_WikiProjects. The former was already being used as a template by all of the U.S. WikiProjects, it just wasn't in the Template namespace. I don't see the advantage of "nesting" it like this. For example Wikipedia:WikiProject Minnesota transcludes {{Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/United States WikiProjects}}, and now it has to go find the content inside {{Template:US-related_WikiProjects}}. As an analogy, we used to have a bucket of water, and now we have a bucket with a bucket of water inside it. — Jonathan Kovaciny (talk|contribs) 20:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I thought I was reducing and simplifying the code on the page. There are also other state projects that use the template, so I was going for standardization too.... If I'm wrong (as, unfortunately, I sometimes am :-) ...), feel free to revert. Thanks, and have a nice day! - NDCompuGeek 21:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)