User talk:N0riooo

Welcome!

Hi N0riooo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Kalki 2898 AD, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Kindly refer to the edit notice given on top of the talk page. Please do not give references which use websites such as Sacnilk.com as their sources (WP:FRUIT) or tweets or posts from producers (WP:PRIMARY). Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jatt & Juliet 3, you may be blocked from editing. See WP:ICTFSOURCES for finding out reliable references in film related articles. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Indian films of 2024, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Indian films of 2024. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Devara: Part 1. Charliehdb (talk) 04:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Singham Again. - Arjayay (talk) 11:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Singham Again, you may be blocked from editing.
Koimoi is not a reliable source as per WP:ICTFSOURCES - Arjayay (talk) 15:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that IMDB, which you raised at Talk:Singham Again is not a reliable source as per WP:IMDB. To save you wasting your, and other editors', time, I suggest you study the lists at WP:RSPSOURCES and WP:ICTFSOURCES and limit your additions and proposals to those allowed by those lists. - Arjayay (talk) 15:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Indian films of 2024.
You must not change a figure, citing a different source in your edit summary to that used in the article, without updating the reference in the article as well - Arjayay (talk) 13:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pushpa 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RangersRus (talk) 13:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for persistent addition of unsourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 11:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

N0riooo , I've removed your ability to edit articles in main space because most of your edits ignore our rules on reliable sources, in that you have been changing the numerical figures of movie articles without providing a source with updated numbers. You can keep editing in other name spaces, such as the talk of articles, to suggest edits, but you won't be able to edit articles directly until you show you understand how to properly utilize reliable sources. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 11:59, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]