User talk:Musarabbyahmad
Unsourced climate changes
More changes without adding sources and unwillingness to discuss may get your account blocked. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:AsceticRose. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 14:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments such as "Hey, you fool bastard. Who are you to saying this me? You bullshit", which you left on User:AsceticRose's talk page are not tolerated on Wikipedia. We have a policy on civility, which I advise you to read and adhere to, otherwise you risk being blocked from this website. -- Marek.69 talk 14:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - This shows you have difficulties to understand fundamental policies of Wikipedia. Please read WP:V and WP:CIV. You are currently blocked for 31 hours to prevent further damage. Please edit constructively after the block expires, to prevent further blocks of your account. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:05, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Musarabbyahmad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Why not? If I came into your house and used language to you like you have been using here, you would order me to go, wouldn't you? You are very lucky to be blocked for only three days. If I'd seen that sort of thing, it would be for much longer. Whatever the rights and wrongs that have led to this position, you do not use language like that here. You cool down and discuss things rationally. Peridon (talk) 10:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Peridon
Who the hell are you? Peridon? Why are you stony-hearted? Why these users are stony hearted?
- Like Ymblanter whom you insulted earlier, I am an administrator here on the English language Wikipedia. I am giving you the best advice on how to help you to get out of this mess. This is a private site, although open to editing by anyone not blocked or banned. Access can be restricted or removed if people fail to follow our rules. Being as rude as you have been is not a good way to help yourself. Now cool down, think, read our policies and come back here when you have done this. Otherwise your talk page access may be removed and your block extended to indefinite. Which means until you can convince us that you are seriously here to help build the encyclopaedia, and not just to shout at people and push one viewpoint. Calm down. Peridon (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hell with these sources and policies. Ymblanter blamed me various times. And you are blaming me again? I am telling you why these persons are merciless and rude? You told me rudely, making me angry. Don't you know my anger, If my temper grows, I am also hacking some website, so I will hack your Wikipedia in FB. Understand, I am telling them many times to fix and re-correct the Wikipedia mistakes, false glosses and explanations and shits. So who the hell you can't fix the Wikipedia. I want to re-correct some pages by editing and solve the incorrect Wikipedia. Understand? Peridon? Musarabbyahmad (talk) 11:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
To threat me
Who the hell are you? Peridon? Why you are threatening me being an estranged person?
Musarabbyahmad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Musarabbyahmad (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declaring your anger and stating that you will not follow our policies does not appear to be a sound reason to unblock this account. Kuru (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hell these policies, Kuru. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 12:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Kuru. Why did you block me? What did I done for you? What did I mistake with you and your family? Why you blocked me at your pleasure? Please tell me my crime/offense that what did I fault? Please be a kind, compassionate, merciful, beneficent and good human. So don't be a rude. Please understand these goofy users. Then I am glad for you. Hope you understand. Thank you. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Kuru. Why did you block me? What did I done for you? What did I mistake with you and your family? Why you blocked me at your pleasure? Please tell me my crime/offense that what did I fault? Please be a kind, compassionate, merciful, beneficent and good human. So don't be a rude. Please understand these goofy users. Then I am glad for you. Hope you understand.
Musarabbyahmad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Kuru. Why did you block me? What did I done for you? What did I mistake with you and your family? Why you blocked me at your pleasure? Please tell me my crime/offense that what did I fault? Please be a kind, compassionate, merciful, beneficent and good human. So don't be a rude. Please understand these goofy users. Then I am glad for you. Hope you understand.
Decline reason:
Just one unblock request at a time, please.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- (Non-administrator comment) attacking other editors will not get you anywhere. I would suggest you keep your unblock requests about your own behavior, rather than attacking others. IF you continue, you will find you have your access to this page removed. --Mdann52talk to me! 14:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Why they blocked me? Why they blamed me as criminal? These users are very crazy and stone-hearted.
Musarabbyahmad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What did I done? This user AsceticRose is annoying me firstly as well as annoyed me all times. They complained the false allegation of other users. Then Kuru blocked me. Why did I done wrong. AsceticRose annoyed/irritated me first time. Please try to be understand, users. I am begging you. I am giving you last warning, If you didn't unblock me, I shall complain the Wikipedia found, Jimmy Wales. He could manage everything. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Rudeness, abuse insult and vituperation are not tolerated here. Possibly the fact that you obviously have only a limited command of the English language may be a reason, but it is not an excuse. But you must show that you understand this to achieve unblock. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- What have you done? [1] and [2] for a start. Also, Jimbo won't do anything - he rarely, if ever, intervenes in cases such as this. My advice if you really want to edit constructively is to take some time off, realize what you did wrong, and submit a new unblock request. 6 months, per WP:Standard offer would be a good length. --Mdann52talk to me! 14:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Friend, I can't talk with you because I am blocked. If I unblocked, I will tell you entire incidents. Anyways, Ymblanter teased me firstly, another user AsceticUser asked me to remove this edits, this is unconstructive, then I asked her that it is not unconstructive, it is really true explanation. I told her many times, but she didn't listen me, she thinks that I am vandalizing Wikipedia. Trust me, I didn't commit any vandalizing Wikipedia. I am also fixing some wrong syntax and mistake/false edits. Ever I haven't been seen this false allegation. There is a problem in Wikipedia. Ymblanter rebuked me, then I rebuked him in contrary. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 14:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, MDann52, are you listening me? Please reply me. I am also told you of all events. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
I didn't committed any crime, begging you to unblock me, understand this crazy user AsceticRose
Musarabbyahmad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- Oh, my badness, :'( why some users blaming me? Why did I done for you, I am begging for you. I am telling truth that this crazy user AsceticRosé making me very anger. Do you want to listen my event? Firstly, when I fix the pages, re-correcting and reverting the false edits and erasing the wrong syntax, solve the problem AsceticRosé blamed me thinking as vandalizing, she threaten me firstly that I was damaged and use personal attacks of Wikipedia, but I didn't want to do this. AsceticRosé have a misunderstanding and if she/he didn't understand this matter, barking like crazy, I think this user have a psychological problem. I accept that I committed a grave mistake. I haven't to rebuke and not use of profanity in Wikipedia. So watch out, secondly I understood her/him (AsceticRosé) that I am fixing Wikipedia, but she didn't pursue me, she becomes very crazy and act like a mental, some days she was annoyed me and irritated me. After 6 hours, AsceticRosé complained Ymblanter as a false allegation for me. I understood her very much in a long time but she/he (AsceticRosé) didn't accept. Either she speaks nonsense talks. I mean this user (AsceticRosé) is giving me being ill-treating. Though she will crazy and have psychological problem, I am begging her/him to apologize. Please everyone trust me. Be a friendly, soft-hearted, beneficent, merciful, well-human, good-heart, pitiful, pathetical, charitable, clement, approvable and remissive. Then I hope kindly gracious for yours. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 15:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have been an editor on Wikipedia for over 7 years, and an administrator for over 3 years, and I have made over 90 000 edits. In the course of all that, I have, unfortunately, come across a significant number of editors who have been abusive to other editors, but I have never once before come across any editor who has poured out such a quantity of venom as you have. It is just possible that when you first came here you thought that such an approach to other editors would be acceptable, but by the time you had been blocked twice you could not possibly have been under that misapprehension. In the context of your editing history, your claims that you don't know what you have done wrong, and don't understand why you have been blocked, make no sense at all. Even when you are blocked for a third time, for making personal attacks, you continue to make personal attacks on another editor in a request for an unblock. Either you really honestly think that that sort of thing is likely to lead to the lifting of the block, in which case you are so out of touch with reality that you will never understand what is wrong with what you have been doing, and so you will never change your ways, or else you know full well what you are doing, and are deliberately trolling. In either of those two cases your presence here will not do anything useful, and will be a waste of other editors' time as well. All of that concerns just the issue of personal attacks, and if we add to that the disruptive nature of your editing in other ways, there is clearly no case at all for unblocking you. In addition, since you have abused talk page access to continue making personal attacks while blocked, your talk page access will be removed. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'm not taking action here, but I would say that I cannot see that the problem has been understood by the blocked user. I do see another load or personal attack above. Musarabbyahmad, please calm down and understand that the admins blocking you DO know what they're doing. They are experienced editors, trusted by the community (and please note that this is a community) to carry out necessary actions to protect the community. If you are prepared to act as a member of the community here, there is hope. If you rant like that, there is none. As part of a community, you should be calm and consider others as well as yourself. Peridon (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Peridon
These are rubbish bastards editors, also blames me. So why they blocked me? What did I mistake me. Peridon, please don't blame me. I can't calm down due of the misbehavior and stone-hearted behave of darnish users. Musarabbyahmad (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
A note for you
I'm sorry that you now have lost access to Wikipedia. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it has to maintain some rules to keep its correctness. We all make contributions following those rules, and you are no exception.
In Hadith, there are some admonitions against the misuse of tongue. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said it is the misuse of tongue (using abusive language, speaking ill) that will lake people to Hell in higher numbers. You seriously need to ponder upon your language. I'm sorry if my and others' steps hurt you, but it happened because you were not ready to listen to others.
Wikipedia software is designed in a way that it records every edit and every word you upload. There is no way to hide them. Therefore, others will know what an editor has done so that you do not need to tell them your story. Thanks. -AsceticRosé 06:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
lists.wikimedia.org. - For the benefit of anyone assessing an unblock request, if one is made, I am placing it on record that Musarabbyahmad has repeatedly evaded this block by editing anonymously from IP address 103.9.114.58, and in the course of doing so has continued making personal attacks, as here, here, here, & here. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)