User talk:Mr Taz

Tnxman307 Don't Shoot me, I am only the messenger.

RfD nomination of Master of Middle-earth, the Achievement of J. R. R. Tolkien

Orphaned non-free image File:Scrabble United States.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scrabble United States.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"English Heritage" as a name

If I understand all this correctly (and there is much in Wikipedia I fail to understand!) there is someone connected with this Talk Page named 'Mr Taz' who, in April last year, contributed a question to the Talk Page on English Heritage to which I have today (10 October) attempted to provide some sort of a purely personal response (character of name chosen, "English Heritage"). Peter Judge October 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.80.55 (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He was blocked from editing last year Peter, so you won't get a reply. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that although this section cannot be removed altogether as a result of some sort of automatic safeguard (at least in my own case) the fact remains that it is completely meaningless since Mr Taz's contribution to the English Heritage page as stated (English Heritage as a name, one which incidentally in my own view made a great deal of sense in relation to the true purpose of English Heritage and was thus at least in this respect relevant to the Talk Page where it had been entered) has itself now been removed altogether by somebody else who clearly knows a good deal more about how this can be done (and no doubt a lot of other things about Wikipedia) then I am ever likely in my old age (if not lack of intelligence or education) to know myself ... so I have to contribute an addition to the original entry here by myself instead. For the reasons given I am obliged to waste a little of the time of those who read it and discover that it no longer means anything, I am sorry to say. Goodbye, Mr Taz, if you read this, and goodluck. I don't know what the argument might have been but I suppose that perhaps you will be back again. Peter Judge —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.16.115.158 (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Monarchs of the United Kingdom

Template:Monarchs of the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big-City America listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big-City America. Since you had some involvement with the Big-City America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kumioko (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

contributions

It is glad to see that other wikipedians independent from me have made the contributions I wished to make.

File:Naval Ensign of Great Britain (white).PNG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naval Ensign of Great Britain (white).PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom (White).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom (White).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UK plc listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UK plc. Since you had some involvement with the UK plc redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National day for the United Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National day for the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National day for the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.EN listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect .EN. Since you had some involvement with the .EN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Chris Morgan (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Ward One

A tag has been placed on Template:Ward One requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fitnr (talk) 02:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Small-Town America listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Small-Town America. Since you had some involvement with the Small-Town America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 07:20, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which Star Is Your State listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Which Star Is Your State. Since you had some involvement with the Which Star Is Your State redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 23:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:First ScotRail.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:First ScotRail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:20, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Occupied Ulster listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Occupied Ulster. Since you had some involvement with the Occupied Ulster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thomas.W ^talk 11:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of pages with prefix User:Mr Taz

I have nominated your user sub-pages for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Pages with prefix User:Mr Taz as they are blank, unused or duplicates of each other. Faithfully, Harrymph (talk) 09:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today YOUR NEWS - WHEN YOU WANT IT listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today YOUR NEWS - WHEN YOU WANT IT. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today YOUR NEWS - WHEN YOU WANT IT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today THE NATION'S NEWSPAPER listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today THE NATION'S NEWSPAPER. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today THE NATION'S NEWSPAPER redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section D listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section D. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section D redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section C and Section D listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section C and Section D. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section C and Section D redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section C & Section D listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section C & Section D. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section C & Section D redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section C listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section C. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section C redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section B listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section B. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section B redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section A and Section B listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section A and Section B. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section A and Section B redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section A & Section B listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section A & Section B. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section A & Section B redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Section A listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Section A. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Section A redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today SPORT and LIFE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today SPORT and LIFE. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today SPORT and LIFE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today SPORT & LIFE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today SPORT & LIFE. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today SPORT & LIFE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today SPORT listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today SPORT. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today SPORT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today ONLINE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today ONLINE. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today ONLINE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today NO.1 IN THE USA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today NO.1 IN THE USA. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today NO.1 IN THE USA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today NEWS and MONEY listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today NEWS and MONEY. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today NEWS and MONEY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today NEWS & MONEY listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today NEWS & MONEY. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today NEWS & MONEY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today NEWS listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today NEWS. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today NEWS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today NATIONAL listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today NATIONAL. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today NATIONAL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today MONEY listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today MONEY. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today MONEY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today LIFE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today LIFE. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today LIFE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today INTERNATIONAL listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today INTERNATIONAL. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today INTERNATIONAL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today Available Around The World listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect USA Today Available Around The World. Since you had some involvement with the USA Today Available Around The World redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

President-incumbent of the United States listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect President-incumbent of the United States. Since you had some involvement with the President-incumbent of the United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (President-incumbent of the United States) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating President-incumbent of the United States, Mr Taz!

Wikipedia editor Velella just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Already at RfD

To reply, leave a comment on Velella's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 01:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One District listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect One District. Since you had some involvement with the One District redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 13:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1 District listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1 District. Since you had some involvement with the 1 District redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 13:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland Ulster listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ireland Ulster. Since you had some involvement with the Ireland Ulster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 20:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geography and identity in Wales

The article Geography and identity in Wales has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I see no assertion of notability, just a random collection of minor mentions in books about Wales.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A Guy into Books (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Politicians with Doctorates listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Australian Politicians with Doctorates. Since you had some involvement with the Australian Politicians with Doctorates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:United Kingdom topic

A tag has been placed on Template:United Kingdom topic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"University of Australia" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect University of Australia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 17#University of Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Matthew hk (talk) 17:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Civil Ensign of England.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Civil Ensign of England.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Civil Ensign of Great Britain.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Civil Ensign of Great Britain.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Civil Ensign of the United Kingdom.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Civil Ensign of the United Kingdom.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Government Ensign of England.png

The file File:Government Ensign of England.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:English Blue Ensign 1620.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Government Ensign of Great Britain.png

The file File:Government Ensign of Great Britain.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wrong colours, superseded by c:File:Blue Ensign of Great Britain (1707-1800).svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Naval Ensign of England.png

The file File:Naval Ensign of England.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by SVG on commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"North-South divide in Scotland" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect North-South divide in Scotland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 7#North-South divide in Scotland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bonoahx (talk) 12:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pledge Card" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pledge Card and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#Pledge Card until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Diana of Althorp" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Diana of Althorp has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30 § Diana of Althorp until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]