User talk:Mr RD/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mr RD. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjana Sanghi
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sanjana Sanghi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. CyberXReftalk 20:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Tips
Don't create articles in your sandbox. Use something like User:Mr RD/draft1 (2, 3, 4 etc for further ones). You've got the move history of another article in Sanjana Sanghi because you can't clear it. You can blank it, but the history is still there when you start another thing. When you want to get rid of a user space draft, put {{db-u1}} at the top of it and save. An admin will see it and delete it properly. You can use u1 on your sandbox, but doing it my way means you can work on more than one thing at a time. By the way, you need much better than IMDb and Facebook as references. Those aren't considered to be reliable independent sources WP:RS because the information comes from the subject (or in the case of Adolf Hitler's IMDb page, from someone we don't know to be reliable...). Doing commercials isn't very notable, while Mandy is a fairly minor role. Most people in show biz start with minor roles (excepting Shirley Temple, Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson...). It really needs more prominent roles in a few films to pass our requirements. Peridon (talk) 21:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Peridon, thanks for your invaluable suggestion, I shall keep it in mind for future. Also as in case of Sanjana Sangavi, though I could not find any reliable independent sources, I heard about her lead role in an upcoming movie. But not much about it is public till now. So I guess we should wait for some time. Also, I thought the reference of her fb page would work fine as per WP:SELFSOURCE. Thanks Mr RD (talk) 06:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- It only really works for things like a list of winners on the award's site, or a list of subsidiaries on a company site. It's for things that there is no reason for the site to put up false or misleading information about. It can't establish notability - it's just a fact check. And remember Clause 5: so long as "the article is not based primarily on such sources". Peridon (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for doubt clearing. Shall keep it in mind. Regards Mr RD (talk) 14:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- It only really works for things like a list of winners on the award's site, or a list of subsidiaries on a company site. It's for things that there is no reason for the site to put up false or misleading information about. It can't establish notability - it's just a fact check. And remember Clause 5: so long as "the article is not based primarily on such sources". Peridon (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kathryn Eisman
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kathryn Eisman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
Hello, Mr RD. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of BioScale Inc.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on BioScale Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of InventHelp’s INPEX Invention Trade Show
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on InventHelp’s INPEX Invention Trade Show, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Khon Kaen MICE Tourism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khon Kaen MICE Tourism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khon Kaen MICE Tourism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 00:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Bangkok MICE Tourism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangkok MICE Tourism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khon Kaen MICE Tourism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Chiang Mai MICE Tourism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chiang Mai MICE Tourism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khon Kaen MICE Tourism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Pattaya MICE Tourism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pattaya MICE Tourism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khon Kaen MICE Tourism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Phuket MICE Tourism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phuket MICE Tourism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khon Kaen MICE Tourism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Baer & Bosch Auctioneers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability - the references are purely promotional and seem mostly to originate from press releases. This appears to be a small auction house that once sold one moderately valuable item. BTW the article was written by a prolific spammer.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Phuket Province. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. andy (talk) 10:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Andy, thanks for suggestion. I thought addition of information about the biggest source of income for the province would be a good addition for wikipedia in a similar manner as Phuket Province#Attractions proves to be useful. Although I agree with you on the point of promotional content but sometimes its becomes difficult to analyse the content created by yourself in such cases related to tourism. Hope you understand and try to edit the content from a neutral point of view rather than blatantly deleting it. Mr RD (talk) 13:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
The article BioScale Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This low-quality article is a POV press release originally written by known spammer[1] Mr RD. The cited Boston Globe article is a stub and fails SIGCOV. Citing the low-circulation Boston Business Journal is probably not helpful: see WP:AUD. The cited Harvard Business Review article might pass WP:AUD, but I think we still need more WP:42-compliant sources. I suspect we probably need two or three more such sources, and this page makes me suspect they don't exist. If you find such sources, please point us to them on the talk page before contesting this deletion.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Unforgettableid (talk) 00:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gajendra Verma
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gajendra Verma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. andy (talk) 10:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
The article Gajendra Verma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Sole possible claim to notability appears to be a single-issue incident. Does not demonstrably meet any other notability criteria listed at WP:MUSIC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Vianello (Talk) 10:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Gajendra Verma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gajendra Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajendra Verma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Vianello (Talk) 11:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: NRC School
Hello Mr RD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of NRC School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please continue to PRO/AfD as desired. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 19:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor! | |
Hello Mr RD.Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers. --Pratyya (Hello!) 13:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
|
?
Nice catch. Sent a note to creator and returned it to AfC. Had a previous submission turned down. Dlohcierekim 15:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your work in The Europe List. Europa man (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC) |
Nomination of The Europe List for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Europe List is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Europe List until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Jreferee (talk) 06:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vanjagenije (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Article notice: Svea Josephy
Dear Mr RD
Thank you for the notice that you placed on the Svea Josephy page. A few days ago we moved this article from the WikiAfrica Incubator to the main Wikipedia space. This article was created by a member of the Public Culture course at UCT, a course offered by the African Studies Unit at UCT in collaboration with WikiAfrica in order to encourage students to learn about and contribute to Wikipedia. Part of their marks involved creating an article about a notable African-based artist or photographer. The member in question does attend UCT (as is indicated on their talk page), but UCT is a large university and this person does not have any dealings with Svea Josephy, and is not a student at Michaelis. Further to this, Svea Josephy is an experienced and well known South African artist, and is therefore of encyclopaedic value to South African and other readers. We will now work to ensure that citations are more diverse and gained from other sectors. Let me know if this allays your concerns. Isla Haddow 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Islahaddow (talk • contribs)
Speedy deletion nomination of BioScale Inc.
Hello Mr RD,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BioScale Inc. for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ironholds (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- This has been nominated for slow deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioScale Inc. -- Y not? 16:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
This account has been blocked for two weeks for abusing multiple accounts per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr RD. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Hello, Mr RD. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Khon Kaen MICE City, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Khon Kaen MICE City. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- hello Unforgettableid, I did not know about the wikipedia policy of multiple accounts so I created them. As far as my created pages are concerned, I have WP:COI in case of the Khon Kaen MICE City and related pages to it. But I only created the pages keeping in mind the content and abiding WP:NPOV. Please have a look at them objectively and please give your review if there is any content which is not factual in the pages. All I request you is to look at pages keeping in mind only the content of the page. Mr RD 14:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of D C Panigrahi
A tag has been placed on D C Panigrahi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 06:37, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Also in this case, I believe the page deserves to be on wikipedia the person has significance contribution in mining industry, is a well renowned academician, administrator, head of a premier institution and a notable author. Apart from the references mentioned in the page, it has numerous citations indicating the subjects' significance in various trusted newspapers and other sources like [2], [3], [4]. I believe it satisfies WP:PEOPLE guidelines quite well. Mr RD 14:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
The article Gregory T. Lucier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- promotional CV created by a paid editor, now blocked for sockpuppertry. No significant coverage in reliable sources which justifies a stand-alone article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cavarrone 15:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Stormy D. Simon, you may be blocked from editing. This warning is for your edit <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stormy_D._Simon&diff=prev&oldid=594851277>. See also Talk:Stormy D. Simon. Cheers! —Unforgettableid (talk) 06:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Weather Smells Like Oranges. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- You retagged an article for speedy deletion after I removed the tag because it doesn't apply. WP:CSD#A7 does not apply to musical recordings. WP:CSD#A9 does, but only if the artist does not have an article at Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Mr RD, Your request for speedy deletion tag was added to an article without any reasons nor discussion on the talk page - this is neither a sign of a good editor nor of positive engagement. From your talk page it seems to be a trend of being a troll - either that or your account has been hacked by some obnoxious person.
Please check your understanding of WP:Note, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:Criteria for deletion and show some effort in achieving good articles. &Brewt@lk 21:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Mr RD, your request for NPOV is not valid as only factual information has been added. Please explain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eshamanth (talk • contribs) 04:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)