User talk:Mr. 123453334

Mr. 123453334, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mr. 123453334! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Donald Trump in popular culture has been reverted.
Your edit here to Donald Trump in popular culture was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://thecritic.fandom.com/wiki/Trump_Tower) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Please sign your talk page posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Kenosha_unrest, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the heads up. Mr. 123453334 (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• Reply - You're welcome. Don't forget to {{ping}} me when you reply. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Batea (mythology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Myrina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mr. 123453334! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, The Cremator/ Spalovac Mrtvol, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mr. 123453334! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, uploading an image?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mr. 123453334. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mr. Heart ^(talk) 02:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

WP:V

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add new information to this encyclopedia, you need to cite your source, which should be an independent, published WP:Reliable source that verifies the information that you are adding (see WP:V for more information) and, helps explain why the new information is important. All the best, and happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mr. 123453334. I'd like to add to what Ssilvers said above and say that I've changed your addition to The Lodger (novel). While I appreciate your edit, it used IMDB as a source, which is considered questionable by the community. What you wrote is true, so I tried to merge it with the rest of the content using a more reliable source. I noticed you also seem to have added unsourced claims to The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog. I'd ask you try and find a reliable source so that readers can verify those claims. All the best, Isabelle ^🔔 11:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Everything I added to The Lodger is from the Criterion release DVD, specifically the William Rothman video essay. I got some of it from The Bunting House video essay also. I do not know how to find them online but if you do find them the info is all there.--Mr. 123453334 (talk) 11:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

If you have an offline source, such as a book, journal or even a video, as long as they are considered reliable, you can still use them to verify claims you are adding to a page. I recommend you take a quick look at WP:HOWCITE to learn how to best cite DVDs. Thanks for helping improve those articles and, if you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Isabelle ^🔔 11:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Decameron (1971 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valbona.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Better source for Blaise Pascal quote on Milky Way

Hey, I saw your change here. The reference could be better formatted to point to a print publication with the Pascal quote in it, but the big problem is that your linked source threatens to crash my computer by sheer size. Can you possibly find a better link, possibly to a more specific source for the quote than a literal syntopicon with other writers? --Anon423 (talk) 08:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Warning over WP:NPA

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 11:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Original research on King of Hearts (1966 film)

While doing page patrol, I noticed that an IP editor had removed this text that you had added with this edit:

Though the film is set during WWI the main message against war which the film pushes is intended to be about the Vietnam war which France had already been involved in for over a decade at this point. The connection between the "war to end all wars" and the then current conflict would have been obvious to French moviegoers at the time. Likewise its status as a cult film is largely because of its connection to the anti-war movement in the 1960s.

It appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)