User talk:Morlet63

Ok, I'm not a wikipedia expert by any means. I'm doing this article as an assignment for a class. I am staff and student at EMU and selected Susan as the subject. Please free up hold on this account so I may remove her single remaining photo so I may finish my assignment.

2

Image copyright problem with File:Susan inauguration.jpg

Response from morlet63: the photos used are from the State university's website on a public domain, photos taken by the university-employed photographer. Photos are property of the university. They are not necessarily copyrighted or protected as this person. I should be able to use the photos without deletion.

Being on a state university web site does not make the image public domain. Eeekster (talk) 01:16, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Susan inauguration.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dr Martin at reception.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Martin at reception.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Neff

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Heather Neff, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.heatherneffbooks.com/old/BiographyPage.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Heather Neff

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Heather Neff, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.heatherneffbooks.com/old/BiographyPage.htm. As a copyright violation, Heather Neff appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Heather Neff has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Heather Neff and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Heather Neff with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Heather Neff.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Heather Neff

A tag has been placed on Heather Neff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. kelapstick (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of speedy deletion tags

Hi, If you oppose the speedy deletion of an article, do not replace the tag with the {{hangon}} tag, simply put it under the deletion tag. Thanks.--kelapstick (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of speedy deletion tags

As I said above, do not remove the speedy deletion tag. You are not allowed to remove a speedy deletion tag on an article that you created. If you read this it is stated at the top of the page. The "hangon" template is still at there, it will be reviewed by an administrator, or another Wikipedia editor and removed if appropriate. As I stated above:

The creator of a page may not remove a Speedy Delete tag from it.--kelapstick (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability guidlines

I suggest that you read the notability guidelines for people and provide some reliable sources that establish Heather Neff's notability if you wish to have an article about here on Wikipedia]].--kelapstick (talk) 19:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Dr Martin.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Martin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Dr Martin.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Martin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Martin

When you revert another editor's changes, common courtesy is to provide an explanation of the reversions, either in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Since no explanation was provided, I have restored my changes. If you believe there is a problem with my edits, please use the article's talk page to discuss those problems. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're trying to do with this article; perhaps you could explain the changes you're trying to make on Talk:Susan Martin, or leave an edit summary? cmadler (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bruce_springsteen.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bruce_springsteen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Susan inauguration1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Susan inauguration1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]