User talk:Moonandback

Hello, Moonandback, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dkriegls (talk to me!) 09:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Behavioral medicine

I reverted a recent edit of yours on the Behavioral Medicine article (seen here). I am fairly sure that it should be singular, since all uses of the term in the book need not be referenced. Only the first use of the term 'Behavioral medicine'. But I am open to critique. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 02:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning was that the term was introduced independently and more or less simultaneously in a book title and two academic clinical programs. I originally used the singular but then decided the plural more accurately stated the case. I think it could be argued both ways but will leave the passage as you have revised it. Moonandback (talk) 07:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Well that makes sense. Is there no way of determining which was published first? Why give credit to both the book and the papers? If not, I agree that it should be plural. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 08:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that it would be possible to determine the exact historical priority. Even if it were, doing full justice to the issue would also require an investigation of the extent to which early uses of the term was consistent with the way the field evolved, which strikes me as beyond the scope of this article. The point I was trying to make is that these independent early uses suggest that the term captured ideas that were in the air at the time, foreshadowing a more extensive development the concept in the later 1970s. I have recast the passage in a way that I hope makes this clearer. Moonandback (talk) 19:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 21:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Moonandback, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco

Hi Moonandback! Thanks for writing. When you modified the article, you took out the Articles for Creation template, so you're right, the "Resubmit" button disappeared. I've added it back. Don't worry, when the article is approved, that template is automatically removed, so you don't have to do it yourself. Hope that helps! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 03:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Moonandback (talk) 07:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! --Mdann52talk to me! 13:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback

Hello, Moonandback. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Anastasia (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^speak up! 08:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco

Hello, Moonandback. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]