User talk:Mojo0306

Welcome!

Hello, Mojo0306, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Backwell. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Rod ^talk 15:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol West boundaries

Hi there. I've reverted your recent addition to the Bristol West (UK Parliament constituency) article because you've got the wrong constituency. You must mean Bristol North West (UK Parliament constituency), although I haven't found a good source for the inclusion of the islands. Here's a map derived from OSM that suggests you are right, but I wouldn't call it a good source. shellac (talk) 19:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnetic nano has been accepted

Magnetic nano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

sami ^talk 12:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birnbeck Pier

Thanks for adding the citation to Birnbeck Pier, however the citation is not needed in the leadf section where the fact is already cited later in the article (in fact the same citation was used). — Rod ^talk 18:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: Ah yes, so it is, I must've missed that. Thanks for letting me know. Mojo0306 (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject!

Hello, Mojo0306! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Me-123567-Me: Thanks for letting me know! I'll join and help in any way that I can. Mojo0306 (talk)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mojo0306. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Well Hung Lover has been accepted

Well Hung Lover, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

Good to add refs behind the details in the infobox.[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Done Mojo0306 (talk) 10:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Also per WP:MEDRS we try to use secondary sources like review articles rather than primary sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mojo0306. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Undecorated Gromit.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested the image in question for deletion as it was an accidental upload. Therefore it shouldn't be on Wikipedia much longer anyway. Mojo0306 (talk) 18:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yatton(s) in Herefordshire

The problem here is that there are two Yattons in Herefordshire: Yatton, Aymestrey and Yatton, east Herefordshire. That is why I had named the page I created 'Yatton, east Herefordshire'. I am inclined to revert your changes. Nedrutland (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see, fair enough. My main intention was to sort out the issue with the disambiguation page. Mojo0306 (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strawberries and Cream Tree has been accepted

Strawberries and Cream Tree, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review and assessing! Mojo0306 (talk) 12:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Strawberries and Cream Tree at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strawberries and Cream Tree

Hi, I just promoted your hook and the beautiful picture to Prep 6. Since the article was an orphan, I added a "see also" link at Backwell. You may want to add a small description of the tree in that article. Additionally, to increase page views after the DYK appearance, you should try to link this article on other Wikipedia pages. Thanks for your contribution! Yoninah (talk) 22:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Mojo0306 (talk) 16:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Strawberries and Cream Tree

On 22 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Strawberries and Cream Tree, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Strawberries and Cream Tree (pictured) is noted for producing two distinct colours of blossom on each side – pink and white – when it blooms every spring? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Strawberries and Cream Tree. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Strawberries and Cream Tree), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des 22:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 12:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Backwell

Thanks for the message - nothing much on the history of Backwell (or Yatton) which is the main reason I never got them to GA when I lived in Somerset. I presume you have tried the local library or local history association?— Rod ^talk 15:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for checking. I shall give the library another go! Mojo0306 (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malinda Kathleen Reese moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Malinda Kathleen Reese, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 19:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Scope creep: and thanks for moving back to draft rather than deleting outright. I must admit to disappointment, but happy to work with you and/or other reviewers to get the article up to shape. One thing to clarify: do you mean the article doesn’t have enough citations overall, or just not enough reliable citations? Many thanks. Mojo0306 (talk) 13:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mojo0306! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Clarification on a BLP article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mojo0306! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, YouTube notability - BLP, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malinda Kathleen Reese (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mojo0306! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MurielMary: Thank you for your review. Surely the article is notable because it contains numerous independent and reliable sources, including Washington Post (x2), Time magaine, Huffington Post, and the Independent, amongst others? Many thanks, Mojo0306 (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinclair Hood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queenstown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I’m glad that the redirect issue is now sorted by another editor. Mojo0306 (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malinda Kathleen Reese has been accepted

Malinda Kathleen Reese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Laplorfill (talk) 15:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Many thanks. Mojo0306 (talk) 09:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Congrats on the acceptance at AfC of Malinda Kathleen Reese!

Pamzeis (talk) 02:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Pamzeis: Thank you for all the edits and support with the article! Glad that it’s passed review. Mojo0306 (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:We Don't Run

Hello, Mojo0306. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:We Don't Run, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: We Don't Run has been accepted

We Don't Run, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jasper More, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Groundspeak Inc. logo (blue).jpeg

The file File:Groundspeak Inc. logo (blue).jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Groundspeak. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girl with a Pierced Eardrum has been accepted

Girl with a Pierced Eardrum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 07:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]