User talk:RandomGuyOnSecondDecember

Mohit Gandmal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mohit Gandmal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Kothe (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devendra Kothe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 18:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mohit Gandmal (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Moderator,

The addiotnal commnets have been added.

Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Kothe (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devendra Kothe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahesh Kothe

Hi my friend Mohit Gandmal. You don't yet seem to know how to create a good article. No problem. I'll try to advise. The general information on new page creation found HERE and especially HERE may help you, as may the referencing for beginners tutorial. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. You might also want to take a quick look at Wikipedia's list of policies and guidelines. I hope this helps. Good luck. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Friend,

Thank you for being understanding and advising in a polite manner. This encourages us to write more.

I will definitely go through the url shared by you. Since, the intent is clear to make fellow user understand that to discourage them to not to write further.

Something, everyone including the newcomers to Wikipedia need to learn.

Thank you & have a good day! Mohit Gandmal (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mahesh Kothe

The article Mahesh Kothe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The history shows just how promotional this article was; the current version makes it clear that this person is simply a city councilor, a position that doesn't guarantee notability. I see no other reason for notability in the current version or in the original spammy version.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Moderator,

Thank you for sharing your view on the subject.

While the original comment for which the mail has been received on my email account is different than the current edited one.

1) The person in question was a mayor 2) The Number of IT parks in India and rest of the world are in limited numbers. In India the number stands at 65.

The only first IT park in Solapur was brought up by Shri Mahesh Kothe, which is one of those (65 IT parks in India).

The aforementioned fact was mentioned in the original article.

Regards for all good work,

Thank you,

Mohit Mohit Gandmal (talk) 08:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahesh Kothe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahesh Kothe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahesh Kothe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Moderator,

Is there an alternative tag which is less severe and prevent the article to be deleted within 7 days.

Thanks. Mohit Gandmal (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes definitely, you can work on saving your article from deletion. Try searching for reliable news sources (as per WP:RS) that discuss life, career, and achievements of Mahesh Kothe, and cite your article with these sources (please see WP:CS). You may also want to participate in the AfD discussion HERE to share your opinion. If you need further assistance, you may ask me, or other editors or visit Wikipedia:Teahouse, a very friendly project. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Kothe (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Devendra Rajesh Kothe instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for starting this draft. Now that he's been elected as an MLA, he's definitely notable, so I've proposed a merge from this draft at Devendra Rajesh Kothe.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devendra Kothe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 14:14, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page Devendra Kothe has been created on 20th November, whereas the new page with least amount of details created on 25th November is being accepted.(Please see the history)

Dear Moderator,

Do you think, an arbitration like this promotes the creation of articles from the new users?

Thank you,

Mohit Mohit Gandmal (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Jannatulbaqi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Devendra Rajesh Kothe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Baqi:) (talk) 15:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly, find your answers below. Ideally the draft which has been created at a later date and lesser details should be merged with the article with more details and submitted at early point of time. i.e 20-November-2024. See the history on both articles.

For Duplicate articles created at later date:

Wikipedia suggests the following:

Duplicate: There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject, with the same scope.

If a duplicate article was recently created, it may also be a candidate for speedy deletion under CSD A10 criteria.

WP:MERGEREASON

WP:OVERLAP

WP:DUP

Note: Recently, means the one with the later date. Mohit Gandmal (talk) 15:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please review WP:CSD#A10: we can't nominate an article in mainspace for speedy deletion just because a draft article was created first. User:Jannatulbaqi was correct to decline your proposed deletion. Your WP:AFD rationale is also incorrect, for the same reason, and I suggest that you remove the AFD template from Devendra Rajesh Kothe. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another user's user page

Hi Mohit Gandmal, I am curious to know why you created User:Venugo. Are you using that account to edit Wikipedia as well as this one? --bonadea contributions talk 15:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea,

Thank you for vising the talk page. The user Venugo, didn't have a page to talk, so had to put it htere.

If there's any other way to communicate to that user, kindly do let know.

Thank you,

Mohit Mohit Gandmal (talk) 15:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Venugo has a user talk page - User talk:Venugo. If you want to communicate with them, do it there. Please don't create user pages for other users. Nthep (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User page was created for one "One User" & not "Users" and whatever the addition help was needed was sought after. As can be seen history. Thank you! Mohit Gandmal (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter that you only created it for one user. Don't create a user page for even one other user. And please listen to the advice that you're patiently being given by experienced editors, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original comment is sort of allegation, which is being cleared. How the comment placed from my end is a disrespect to experienced editors. When am clearing the air by commenting:

!) Page has been created for 1 user and not multiple users.

2) I am patiently reading the comments of experienced editors & not listening.

Thank you Mohit Gandmal (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't even create a user page for one other user. Do you understand? Wikishovel (talk) 16:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Kothe (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Devendra Kothe instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are more details in this draft, but most of that content should not be in a Wikipedia article anyway. Instead of going through the cumbersome deletion processes, you can request a history merge if you believe that the newer article copied your older draft. See WP:HM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devendra Kothe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]