User talk:Modgardener

Welcome!

Hello, Modgardener, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Orphan Wiki 17:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TAMSCA

A tag has been placed on TAMSCA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TAMSCA - The All Mod Scooter Clubs Alliance

A tag has been placed on TAMSCA - The All Mod Scooter Clubs Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of English Radical Alliance

The article English Radical Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. While there may be a legitimate article on this newly formed political party, this article is not it, and would require a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion

Your recent edit history seems to indicate that you are here solely to promote the English Radical Alliance. Please remember that Wikipedia is not here to promote any particular cause, and that all articles must be written from a neutral point of view and be properly sourced. Your edits do not seem to follow any of these guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of English Radicals

The article English Radicals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced essay and opinion, and possibly spam, attempting to promote a particular political party.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from English Radical Alliance. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to English Radical Alliance, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:47, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of English Radical Alliance

The article English Radical Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable: no mainstream coverage (BBC, any national newspaper, etc.)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 18:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of English Radical Alliance for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article English Radical Alliance, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Radical Alliance until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 20:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have made several comments at Talk:English Radical Alliance contesting the deletion of the article. In order to have your voice heard in the discussion, you must comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Radical Alliance. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]