User talk:Mmddyy28/Archive 1

Archive 1

Mmddyy28, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mmddyy28! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Ike1x (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Seriously, we can see whenever you delete stuff. You're not hiding anything, all you're doing is giving the admins more reasons to block you for longer periods, if not indefinitely. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Some tips that could help you out if you choose to follow them

I've been here for several years, and have a good understanding of how this place works. You're definitely going to receive a block very soon. It may not be permanent (yet), but if you continue certain behaviors, a permanent block would be inevitable. If you want to continue editing here, some thing that would help include:

• Backing down from trying to "fix" the article Once Upon a Time (season 4) until the dust settles
• Discuss the issue on Talk:Once Upon a Time (season 4) once your block is over instead of edit warring.
• Read guidelines and policies when they're linked to. They're there for a reason, and they're not likely to go away any time soon. WP:Edit warring and WP:Crystal being a couple that I've seen that you need to pay attention to.
• Don't delete other people's comments on any page but this one. You are allowed to remove warnings and other messages, but it is taken as a sign that you've read and understand them.
• Lots of people have pages on their watchlists.
• Until you have good evidence otherwise, assume that other people are here to help the site just as much as you are. If someone gives you a warning, they're not out to get you, they're hoping you'll stop doing whatever it was they thought violated this site's policies. If you're confused, ask them about it nicely. Wait for them to be a dick before treating them as such, and even if they do, don't lash out but discuss the matter with an user. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for you tips, and time.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleting the discussion on blocking you is going to hinder your argument and probably even increase the duration of your block, just a friendly warning so that you can get back to editing quickly after your block--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 11:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ditto51: I get you were trying to leave a "friendly warning. But you then turn around and put "further evidence against me" on the discussion of my blocking. What's wrong with that?

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring not only on an article, but on the formal Administrator noticeboard WP:AN/3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   the panda ₯’ 11:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

@DangerousPanda

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mmddyy28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think I should be unblocked because I am sincerely sorry about all I have done and any trouble I have caused. Upon being unblocked, I will not constantly change edits of others'. Instead I will go to an article talk page, or another users' talk page and work it out, explaining my side of the story. In other words, if I am unblocked, I will be more vigilant and will try not to engage in any more edit wars. I am once again, sincerely sorry. I would also like to say that I am extremely sorry for vandalizing an administrator page. I only kept deleting it (while engaging in another edit war) because I believed I was wrongly "convicted". Instead of talking it out, I decided to act childish and keep on deleting and deleting. This will not happen again.

Decline reason:

This block has expired. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm giving you a warning, but it will still has to be noted. I was warning you because further attempts to remove will impede your defense and cause your block to be longer than it would have been should you have only been blocked for Edit Warring/The 3 revert rule.--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 11:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

You have Messages

You have messages over at User Talk:Ditto51 --Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 21:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Adoption

Hiya. Are you looking for adoption, or are you adopting people? You can't do both at the same time. Cheers. Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 16:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)