User talk:Mli63
 | This user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies. |
Welcome Mli63!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your userpage.Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Your submission at AfC Look to the Rainbow was accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Look to the Rainbow
[edit]Hi – I've located and added the reviews from the three major UK music magazines of the time to the critical review section... two good, one bad, but it's good to have a range to reviews to provide a balanced review of the album. Hope these are of use – the article looks in good shape now. Richard3120 (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you very much for your efforts, Richard. Yes the article now looks pretty good. Better than I've expected when I started it - thanks to all that helped.
- )