User talk:Miyagawa/Archive 20

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

→

Archive 25

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxford Parliament (1258), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon de Montfort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: The God Thing

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: The God Thing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
4		Title (animal) (talk)						Add sources
35		Death Wish (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Add sources
1,152		Star Trek: Enterprise (talk)						Add sources
48		Alexander Courage (talk)						Add sources
184		T'Pol (talk)						Add sources
1,157		Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (talk)						Add sources
92		Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares (talk)						Cleanup
174		Luke Kelly (talk)						Cleanup
14		Dingle Foot (talk)						Cleanup
315		Leslie Moonves (talk)						Expand
26		Imaginary Friend (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (talk)						Expand
17		Non Sequitur (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Expand
580		Heston Blumenthal (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
61		Cultural influence of Star Trek (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
50		Star Trek: Starfleet Academy (video game) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
182		Tim Russ (talk)						Merge
97		Scent hound (talk)						Merge
8		Scenthound Group (talk)						Merge
114		Conservative Monday Club (talk)						Wikify
4		The Glamour (Short Story) (talk)						Wikify
7		Duncan Barrett (talk)						Wikify
1		Marc Henrie (talk)						Orphan
1		Antoni Egea (talk)						Orphan
7		AG Dolla (talk)						Orphan
18		Magong, Taiwan (talk)						Stub
4		Equestrian statue of George Stuart White (talk)						Stub
9		Statue of Charlie Chaplin, London (talk)						Stub
15		Damage (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Stub
5		Statue of the Earl of Derby, Parliament Square (talk)						Stub
11		United (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Interview Request

Hi Miyagawa. I work with the Learning and Evaluation team at WMF. I would like to talk to you about your experiences planning and running on-wiki writing/editing contests. Specifically, I am interested in learning more about your experiences working on the WikiCup. My goal is to learn more about the strategies that program leaders are using to plan and conduct successful writing and editing contests. We will create a toolkit to share this knowledge with program leaders across the movement. Please send me an email at kharoldwikimedia.org if you are interested in setting up a time to speak, or if you have any questions or concerns. I hope to hear from you soon! KHarold (WMF) (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 12 Downing Street

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Boat Race reviews

		The Running Man Barnstar
		Hey Miyagawa, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the many reviews of Boat Race articles you've conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Edith Pitt

Thanks from the DYK project and I Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Herald -- The Herald (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Herald -- The Herald (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Miyagawa. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 12:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

-The Herald ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 12:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cold Station 12, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strategem. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Station 12

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cold Station 12 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gene Roddenberry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rolls-Royce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Station 12

The article Cold Station 12 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cold Station 12 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 11:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Mistake!!

Sorry... it was a mistake..-The Herald • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 16:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

May be this will work in future..:) -The Herald • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 16:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Not again!! Can you please remove my rollback right for some time by when I'll be more acquainted with my newly acquired tablet? I can do with twinkle and live with that. Too many accidentals ruin my face. Thanks.-The Herald • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 14:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

BTW, did I mistake you an admin? Sorry...-The Herald • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 14:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cold Station 12

The article Cold Station 12 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cold Station 12 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 17:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Expanse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

deOrphaning script

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

• This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) is a long-period comet discovered on 17 August 2014 by Terry Lovejoy; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by The Herald (submissions) during the second round.

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

• Coemgenus (submissions) was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
• LeftAire (submissions) worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Source request

Hi,

I was wondering if you might be able to help me access some info from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion, specifically the last page of the chapter on Looking for par'Mach in All the Wrong Places. The Google Books preview includes all of that chapter except what appears to be page 377, and I'd like to know if it has any useful info for the article. Many thanks in advance, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

• New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
• New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
• Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
820		Borg (Star Trek) (talk)						Add sources
54		Phlox (Star Trek) (talk)						Add sources
12		Shadows of P'Jem (talk)						Add sources
106		Empire (2005 TV series) (talk)						Add sources
436		Vulcan (Star Trek) (talk)						Add sources
16		Murder of Agnès Marin (talk)						Add sources
14		Tattoo (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Cleanup
2,155		Patrick Stewart (talk)						Cleanup
625		Optimus Prime (talk)						Cleanup
49		Future's End (talk)						Expand
339		Creation–evolution controversy (talk)						Expand
20		Shattered (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Expand
90		All Our Yesterdays (Star Trek: The Original Series) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
85		Theme from Star Trek (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,337		Genderqueer (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
356		Lexx (talk)						Merge
995		Homicide (talk)						Merge
6		The Questor Tapes (TV series) (talk)						Merge
37		Playmates Toys (talk)						Wikify
5		Chevron Hall of Stars (talk)						Wikify
152		SHODAN (talk)						Wikify
3		Akriyavada (talk)						Orphan
2		Association of Certified Fraud Specialists (talk)						Orphan
6		Andrew Long (talk)						Orphan
199		Jess Weixler (talk)						Stub
108		Europa Universalis: Rome (talk)						Stub
10		The Voyager Conspiracy (talk)						Stub
27		Labour Party (UK) leadership election, 1983 (talk)						Stub
102		Dragan Kojić Keba (talk)						Stub
459		Americana (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Alexander Asher

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)

Hello! Your submission of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Whoa, why did you shut down your own DYK nomination? Those were the last points I was going to raise, we were almost there. I know this may have gone past an average DYK review, but that happens sometimes – look at the review of one of my nominations, Template:Did you know nominations/International Conference on Hollywoodism, it went on for two months. But I stayed in there and eventually it got promoted. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

I did the changes you suggested, I just ended up thinking that it wasn't worthwhile putting it up on the front page, that's all. Miyagawa (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)

The article Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2)

The article Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Labour Party (UK) leadership election, 1988

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Nobel Prize in Physics

@Figureskatingfan and Sturmvogel 66:I have added new info, repaired all the dead links (most were), rewrote the entire article and added new cites. Along with it, updated and expanded the lead. Are they still not under the threshold of WikiCup rules? Can't understand why they aren't? Strange!!! Thanks for the understanding...-The Herald • ^{the joy of the LORD}_{my strength} 19:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

The problem with that one is that the citation changes might look large in bytes but don't really count as anything but copyediting or tweaks. So having removed those from the equation, this means you added the text "a yearly award given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for those who conferred the most outstanding contributions for mankind in the field of physics", "Nobel laureates are selected by the Nobel Committee for Physics, a Nobel Committee that consists of five members elected by The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. In the first stage, several thousand people are asked to nominate candidates. These names are scrutinized and discussed by experts who", "The names of the nominees are never publicly announced, and neither are they told that they have been considered for the prize. Nomination records are sealed for fifty years." That's it = those four and a half sentences. Miyagawa (talk) 20:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 02:00, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 02:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Roddenberry

Finally had a chance to read through this. I think it's a solid article; while I can't speak to the coverage, it certainly hits all the major points (although I think you should briefly mention Roddenberry's involvement or lack thereof in the films past the first and second one.) Will definitely need a stiff copyedit at some point. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 12:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gene Roddenberry filmography‎

Harrias ^talk 22:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Janice Rand

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Star Trek Barnstar

		The Star Trek Barnstar
		For the time and effort you put into producing high-quality Star Trek-related articles, and for your dedication to cheerfully encouraging other editors to do the same, I award you this barnstar. You have made the Star Trek portion of Wikipedia substantially better, both in the content and in the community. To the journey. Neelix (talk) 01:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm Confused

Hello:

I have been doing an extensive copy edit of your Gene Roddenberry article. I need to draw this to your attention. The following paragraph is confusing - perhaps you could rewrite it so that it makes sense?

"In 1972 and 1973, Roddenberry made a comeback to science fiction, selling ideas for four new series to a variety of networks.[134] Roddenberry's Genesis II was set in a post-apocalyptic Earth. He had hoped to recreate the success of Star Trek without "doing another space-hopping show". He created a 45-page writing guide, and proposed several story ideas based on the pretence that the scenario would have caused pockets of civilisation to regress to past eras or change altogether.[136] The pilot aired as a TV movie in March 1973, setting new records for the Thursday Night Movie of the Week. Roddenberry was asked to produce four more scripts for episodes but, before production began again, CBS aired Planet of the Apes. The ratings were poor, and Genesis II was scrapped and replaced by a Apes television series.[137]"

The way this reads to me is that Genesis II was a ratings success, setting records. Then Planet of the Apes Was shown and the ratings were poor. So Genesis II was cancelled and POTA was made into a series. See my problem? Thanks. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

You're quite right - the line "the ratings were poor" can't be right, so I'm not sure what I was thinking. I'll double check the source when I get home tonight and correct it. BTW, massive thanks for copyediting this article. Miyagawa (talk) 12:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome.Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: I've fixed it now - the ratings weren't poor, they were even higher than Genesis II'. Miyagawa (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year/archive1

As you have previously commented on similar nominations, I wondered if you would be kind enough to take a look at Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year which is now nominated at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Cricket Writers' Club Young Cricketer of the Year/archive1? Harrias ^talk 11:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

I've responded to your query on the nom page; I'm sort of in two minds about it, but wonder what you think? Harrias ^talk 09:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Further Roddenberry Questions

Hello again: In the section of your article on Roddenberry – Star Trek Revival - you originally wrote the opening paragraph as follows:

"Due to lack of funds, Roddenberry was unable to buy the full rights to Star Trek for $150,000 in the early 1970s, leading Lou Scheimer to approach the company in 1973 about creating an animated Star Trek series."

As this was unclear to me, I rewrote it as:

"Due to lack of funds, Roddenberry was unable to buy the full rights to Star Trek for $150,000 in the early 1970s. Lou Scheimer approached the company in 1973 about creating an animated Star Trek series."

As I was working on my final pass of the copy edit I realized there’s still a disconnect between these two sentences as I've written them. Could you check and clarify:

Who was GR trying to buy the rights to Star Trek from? Is the fact he couldn’t buy the rights the reason for Scheimer approaching the company (which company, by the way) to produce an animated series?

I’m almost finished the final copy edit - just a few sections to go.

Thanks Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: - you're quite right, that doesn't explain who they're referring to! In both cases it was Paramount Television, which had formed out of Desilu Productions. Miyagawa (talk) 22:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

References

Gene Roddenberry Article

Hello: Just a quick note to say that my copy edit is finished. I hope that you're pleased with it. I learned a lot from the article. I assume one of the supervisors of the GOCE will look it over before removing and archiving your copy edit request. Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 2nd GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Our inaugural competition, which ran from October 2014 to April 2015, was such a resounding success that we'd like to do it again. Currently, there are over 500 GANs ready to be reviewed; competitors in the previous GA Cup reviewed about 570 GAs, so we can again make a huge impact in helping editors improve articles in Wikipedia and decrease the traditionally long queue at GAN. The 2nd GA Cup will begin on July 1, 2015. As last time, five rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on November 28, 2015), but this may change based on participant numbers. The judges learned a lot during the 1st GA Cup which exposed weaknesses in its system. Using both the feedback from last year's participants and the weaknesses discovered, we've revised the scoring system to make it more fair. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same. We also are introducing three new judges: 3family6, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. So in total, there will be six judges. We hope this will allow the competition to run more smoothly. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on July 15, 2015. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from 3family6, Dom497, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo, and TheQ Editor.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
152		Lani Minella (talk)						Add sources
63		42nd Regiment of Foot (talk)						Add sources
75		Doctor (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Add sources
165		Galeazzo Ciano (talk)						Add sources
347		Appleseed (film) (talk)						Add sources
239		Lifeboat (shipboard) (talk)						Add sources
771		Italian unification (talk)						Cleanup
242		United Federation of Planets (talk)						Cleanup
12		Hawaii Five-O (season 3) (talk)						Cleanup
40		Broken Bow (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Expand
37		Year of Hell (talk)						Expand
428		Color photography (talk)						Expand
383		Wack Pack (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
10		Eureka Maru (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
13		Kevin and Don Norte (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
259		Sirius XM Holdings (talk)						Merge
397		Hypothetical Axis victory in World War II (talk)						Merge
26		Servalan (talk)						Merge
2,168		The Exorcist (film) (talk)						Wikify
722		Walter Koenig (talk)						Wikify
22		Hawaii Five-O (season 2) (talk)						Wikify
3		Adam of Barking (talk)						Orphan
2		Amambai Mountains (talk)						Orphan
1		Acmaeopsoides rufula (talk)						Orphan
14		Visionary (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (talk)						Stub
12		Worst Case Scenario (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Stub
22		Nemesis (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Stub
34		Machinehead (song) (talk)						Stub
10		Stratagem (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Stub
5		Policy address of Hong Kong (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of XCOM 2

Hello! Your submission of XCOM 2 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 10:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

2012 Summer Olympics medal table FL promotion

Hi there,

I am planning to improve the medal table of 2012 Summer Olympics for featured list consideration next February. I want to start making changes right now because I may have a heavier college workload come fall. I need help where to start (I did a few edits last year).

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

@Birdienest81: I've just taken a look and the article is already in pretty good shape. The table seems to be correctly formatted, and the existing material is all cited. If you have further information to add to it, then by all means but I think it's not far off an FL already. Miyagawa (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

• Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
• Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
• Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
• Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Request to submit delayed Wikicup submissions

Hi Miyagawa, tomorrow I will be going on holiday until the 24th but I have a few potential WikiCup submissions going through the proceedures at the moment. Is it OK if anything that gets promoted between now and then be accepted if I submit it when I return? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Yep, that'll be fine. Miyagawa (talk) 09:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 21:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zero Hour (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BenLinus1214 -- BenLinus1214 (talk) 18:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Bobby Chinn

Hi, any chance you could expand this?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I managed to get it past the 1500 minimum for DYK and have nominated it there. I couldn't find a great deal on it, but certainly I now have a go to place if I ever end up in Hanoi! Miyagawa (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Excellent work, thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for XCOM 2

Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Bobby Chinn (restaurant) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Unity (Star Trek: Voyager)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 15:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Unity (Star Trek: Voyager)

The article Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rejoined

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rejoined you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Tuna (dog)

Gatoclass (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: The God Thing

The article Star Trek: The God Thing you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Star Trek: The God Thing for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 16:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Augments

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Augments you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)

The article Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - June 2015 Welcome to the GA Cup! In less than 72 hours, the competition will begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations and reassessments we want to make sure you understand the following: This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed here. If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under FAQ #4. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP! The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "Scoring" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that every single review will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning. The same applies with reassessments. If you just say that the article should be delisted or kept with no explanation, points will not be awarded. Remember, to submit Good article reviews and reassessments on your submissions page (Some of you have not created your submissions page yet. Only reviews/reassessments submitted on your submissions page can earn points. If you participated in the 2014-2015 GA Cup, you still need to re-create your submissions page.). Detailed instructions on how to submit reviews and reassessments can be found under the "Submissions" page. Ask a judge if you need clarification. Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages. Now some of you are probably wondering how on earth the rounds will work. The rounds will work in a similar fashion as the previous competition, with the exception of the first round. Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on (this number may change), so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools. The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1. It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on UTC time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on July 1 at 0:00:01 UTC; Round 1 will end on July 29 at 23:59:59 UTC; Round 2 will commence on August 1 at 0:00:01 UTC. All reviews must be started after or on the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified. Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on July 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action! If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message here. After sign-ups close, check the Pools page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on. Cheers from 3family6, Dom497, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Csisc Status

Dear User,

I had withdrawn from 2015 WikiCup. Please update the 2015 WikiCup Standings.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
41		The Doctor (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Add sources
350		F. W. Woolworth Company (talk)						Add sources
16		Shinnyo-en (talk)						Add sources
462		Interrobang (talk)						Add sources
486		Stratosphere (talk)						Add sources
1,021		Star Trek: Voyager (talk)						Add sources
78		Star Trek fandom (talk)						Cleanup
17		Hawaii Five-O (season 1) (talk)						Cleanup
8		Hawaii Five-O (season 4) (talk)						Cleanup
10		David Livingston (talk)						Expand
203		Alan Keyes (talk)						Expand
23		Renaissance Man (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Expand
1,326		Star Trek: The Original Series (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
268		Rocket engine (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
4		TrekNation (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
9		University society (talk)						Merge
345		Turducken (talk)						Merge
196		Frame story (talk)						Merge
146		All Good Things... (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (talk)						Wikify
1		Lassie (season 14) (talk)						Wikify
10		Future Tense (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Wikify
3		Star Trek: Chains of Betrayal (talk)						Orphan
2		Anandalaya Education Society (talk)						Orphan
0		Andrea Romitti (talk)						Orphan
8		Star Trek/Planet of the Apes: The Primate Directive (talk)						Stub
6		The Crossing (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Stub
10		Spirit Folk (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Stub
61		Abby Brammell (talk)						Stub
345		International organization (talk)						Stub
15		Unforgettable (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bobby Chinn (restaurant)

Gatoclass (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikicup Round 4 submissions yet?

I see you have just cleared my round 3 wikicup submissions page - does this mean I can submit one which has just been promoted or should I wait until tomorrow?— Rod ^talk 16:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

I'd wait till tomorrow - it'll stop people from getting riled up. Miyagawa (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

OK.— Rod ^talk 19:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Bonus point table

You are more than welcome to add a link from my submissions to this table if that is helpful...Godot13 (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek: Voyager (season 4)

The article Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek: Voyager (season 4) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 05:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

FP bonus

Hi Miyagawa-

I deleted the bonus point notation for my first FP submission because the bot somehow misread it as a claim for FPO points. If my deletion does not correct the scoreboard, could you please manually delete the FPO points posted. Thanks.--Godot13 (talk) 04:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

I also think I found a way to represent the bonus points (not tallied) in the FP section- simply add them in italics (or bold) after the description. Let me know if that works.--Godot13 (talk) 04:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

@Godot13: Lets go with that instead, that looks to work better. Miyagawa (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominations

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Unity (Star Trek: Voyager) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek Beyond at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rejoined

The article Rejoined you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rejoined for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 15:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Augments

The article The Augments you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Augments for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 00:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Good job. I'm working on closing out the review. Thanks, again. Viriditas (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Unity (Star Trek: Voyager)

Gatoclass (talk) 00:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Omar Allibhoy

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Augments

The article The Augments you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Augments for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Good topics for GA Cup

Hi, I see you removed some of the articles which made up the Good Topic English Heritage properties in Somerset from scoring points. This is different from my interpretation of the rules which say:

• Points are awarded per article in the topic that was worked on by you. If you would have a right to claim points for the promotion of the article to good or featured status, you have the right to claim points for its promotion as part of the topic, even if you did not nominate the topic.
  • This applies even if the work on these articles was not done this year, as long as you have done significant work on at least one article in the topic this year.

Perhaps I'm reading it wrong?— Rod ^talk 07:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Would it be worth putting this discussion on the wikicup talk page, so that others would be aware of our different interpretations of the rules for scoring on this? Perhaps the wording could be tightened (for next years competition)?— Rod ^talk 07:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for bring that to my attention - I'd missed the third bullet, so I'll go restore those articles now to your submissions page and the bot will pick it up on the next pass. Miyagawa (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I think this will apply to Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Scheduled monuments in Somerset/archive1 and a future GT nomination on National Trust properties in the county I'm hoping to nominate before long, so wanted to ensure my reading was right.— Rod ^talk 07:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

It's quite clear - until one of the judges missed 1/3 of the rules on it! :) Miyagawa (talk) 07:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

GT and FT candidates

Thanks for your contribution at Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/English Heritage properties in Somerset/archive1 which has now been promoted as a good topic. Would you be kind enough to take a look at Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Scheduled monuments in Somerset/archive1 which is currently nominated for featured topic?— Rod ^talk 07:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

• New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
• Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
• Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
• American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Star Trek Beyond

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)