User talk:Mirasmus

Welcome!

Hello Mirasmus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fawcett5 16:22, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Washington

Hey, I noticed you prodded Nate Washington because his "club" didn't have an article. Thing is, that's actually a major American football professional team--the guy just misspelled it. Please also do not mark deletion proposals as minor. Make sure the edit summary makes it clear that you're proposing the article for deletion, not fixing a spelling error. NickelShoe 02:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Thanks for picking it up. Not being American I didn't notice that the club was misspelt. I should also change my preferences so that my 'this is a minor edit' box isn't checked by default. Apologies. Mirasmus 03:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prodding high schools

Please don't do it. High schools have been subject to fierce controversy, but they are never deleted and any that you prod will soon be deprodded. Honbicot 18:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advice. Can you please direct me to the Wiki policy that says that all highschools are allowed to remain, no matter how non-notable they are? I would then be quite happy to abide by the view that they remain. I imagine that soon we will also have primary schools, kindergartens and day-care centres too. Sorry. Pardon the facetiousness but where will it end? Mirasmus 02:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schools are controversial. Some people seem to hate them. In terms of the economy, a single high school has a much much larger impact than any TV series, no matter how popular it is; yet WP has no problem documenting TV series episodes in painful detail. A single school-teacher has about the same economic impact as a single TV episode or a single rock-n-roll album. Imagine documenting the quirks of your high-school teachers in similar detail, as if they were Pokemon characters (of which WP has hundreds of articles on). Culturally, Americans do not value schooling and intelligence, and prefer action and adventure; your anti-high-school slant is typical of the anti-intellectual culture in the US. linas 17:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent points. However, I do not believe that TV episodes are notable, nor pokemon characters nor any of the Japanese cartoons that litter WP. I'd like to delete them all. If a high school (or any school) is notable, though being special in some particular way, then by all means include it, but not the myriad of schools with no particular claim to notability. My anti-school slant maybe typical of US anti-intellectualism, but I'm not American, and a glance at the articles I create or edit will show my true light. Mirasmus 01:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you find an insubstantial article on a public school, just merge and redirect it to an article on its parent school district. Postdlf 03:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding USA to everything

Please use some judgment when adding the USA link to placenames. First of all, USA redirects, so please put in the correct link ([[United States|USA]]). Second, while some of your additions are reasonable (I wouldn't expect someone from Singapore to know too much about Oklahoma), some are totally unnecessary, such as clarifying that New York is in the US. Dbinder 14:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I add country names to all locations, regardless of whether it is the USA, Madagascar or Australia. I do not assume that people all over the world automatically know where a place is, not matter how apparently famous it is. I am amazed that people assume that their little patch of this planet is known to everyone. Mirasmus 02:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

de Rham curve

I expanded the de Rham curve article, as per your request on my talk page. linas 17:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate it.Mirasmus 01:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khinchin's theorem

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Khinchin's theorem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DavidCBryant 15:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Khinchin's theorem

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Khinchin's theorem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Igny 03:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uyot

Hello! This page you created in 2006 is currently under AfD. The main concern is that we can't determine what species this refers to. Do you happen to know the binomial that this common name refers to? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Rkitko ^(talk) 06:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mirasmus! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Kathleen Miller - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henci Goer

The article Henci Goer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is an advertisement - the person is not noteable. This article has existed since March 2006 and, after research, no third party sources appear to exist to verify notablity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mark^Dask 11:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]