User talk:Milton Stanley/Archive1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Milton Stanley. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

AFD

As an inclusionist, please review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity and please take a side.

Done. Thanks for drawing my attention to this article - before this, I didn't realize there were Article for Deletion discussions.

Thank you for your good word! I don't think you did anything wrong at all. Motor was being obnoxious, got on your tail (and those of other Keep voters who got the link to the AfD) and you were defending yourself. S/he reminds me of the Tireless Rebutter on Flamewarriors.

He/she was really starting to tick me off and I had to constantly edit and re-edit what I wanted to post because if I posted what I really wanted to say, it would've been reported as a personal attack. Jaguara 23:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I see you've been here for a while, but haven't been given a proper welcome! Anyway, for what it's worth I entirely agree with your statements on the Beethoven talk page, I think at this point most people are simply ignoring that guy in the hopes that he'll get bored and take his racist clap-trap with him. Cheers, and welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Milton Stanley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 16:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now

Sorry to bother you, but as an Inclusionist wikipedia things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Kappa, while I wholeheartedly agree with your stance, and since the fact is that no one would ever know this article existed without entering it into the search box (in which case, they would want to see the article), I have found that AfD's are little more than a justification for deletion, the inclusionists are a minority with no actual voice, and that if an article has already been deleted, in the light of the impossibility of 'winning' an AfD, it is hopeless to try to regain it. I also want to say for the record that I don't have any problem with 'mass-spamming' people's attention to these types of things - freedom and information thrive on conflict and diversity, and the more people who bring their opinion to a discussion, the better. --Milton 04:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)