User talk:Michelle.Hutchings

This is Michelle.Hutchings's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michelle.Hutchings! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello Michelle.Hutchings. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Michelle.Hutchings. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Michelle.Hutchings|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to User talk:Sulfurboy while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:29, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris, thanks so much for making me aware of that! I was accidentally logged out and didn't realize that would happen. I will remember to log in in the future. Appreciate it! Michelle.Hutchings (talk) 02:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you work for Penn...

You have been invited to join WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Pennsylvania. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or add some of your own.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a recruitment brochure. It's possible that the subject is notable, but this would likely require a total rewrite from scratch to meet our WP:NPOV guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research (July 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chris troutman was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not an advertising platform! This draft relies almost entirely on citations from the University, philanthropynewsdigest.org is a press release, and the piece in Medium was also written by the University.

Chris Troutman (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research

Hello, Michelle.Hutchings. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vagelos Integrated Program in Energy Research".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]