User talk:MiInReAs

Welcome!

Hello, MiInReAs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as James Ibold, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 22:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Ibold

The article James Ibold has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 22:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the removal of James Ibold's wiki page and reliable source's are cited.--MiInReAs (talk) 07:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Ibold

Hello, MiInReAs. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, James Ibold, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want James Ibold to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Ibold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Ibold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ibold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 05:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with James Ibold. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Bakilas (talk) 06:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at James Ibold. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. All you need to do to prevent James Ibold being deleted is to demonstrate notability. That means a cite from a third party reliable source, some kind of write up that is actually about James Ibold himself. Not something about someone he once worked with. Not something that mentions him in a listing, or quoting him talking about someone else.

Do you have anything of one of his gigs or recordings being reviewed? Any interviews with him about his work?

Hope this helps. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Names in citations

Hello MiInReAs. Just a note to say that the first= and last= fields in citation templates are meant to be used for the first and last names of the author of the source, not the subject of the Wikipedia article you are writing about. So, for example, here, citing this, you should have listed Larry Nager as the author, not Big Joe Duskin. Also, the text you put in the title= field should match the title of the source article ("Cammys honors career of Big Joe Duskin"). Cordless Larry (talk) 18:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at James Ibold. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MiInReAs

A tag has been placed on User:MiInReAs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because...

The reference was cited as requested and outlined in the : Proposed deletion of biographies of living people as follows:

The proposed deletion process for unsourced biographies requires all biographies of living persons to have at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement about the subject. Once the article is tagged in this manner, the tag may not be removed until such a source is provided. If none is forthcoming, the article may be deleted after seven days. This does not affect any other deletion process.

Lady's and Gentleman of the Wikipedia editorial site; I have many reliable sources cited that support claims. I have added....

The one included I will cite is from: The Cincinnati Enquirer from Sunday February 6, 2005 Page 52,

"Local musician James Ibold met Duskin at Dollar Bills in the 1970s, and has since traveled the world to perform with him. The guitarist says that Duskin is noted for his strongly melodic song structures and his skilled left-hand runs on the keyboard. Learned from the greats Duskin provides one of the last living connections to Meade Lux Lewis, Pete Johnson, Albert Ammons and the other musicians who forged the boogie woogie style, Ibold says. "Joe is the direct descendent and learned directly from them," he says. "He is definitely the king of the boogie woogie."

Now I have stated Big Joe Duskin introduced James Ibold as his "consummate guitarist for over thirty years" on their final performance together on the Arches Piano Stage at the Cincinnati Blues Festival. Big Joe Duskin's statement about the subject of James Ibold and a news paper article supporting Claims from a Reliable Source states: since the 70's Ibold has traveled the world to perform with him.

Those are and have at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement about the subject.

That is the verbatim definition of your Proposed deletion of biographies of living people.

Please acknowledge the references supplied for James Ibold and vote for inclusion.--MiInReAs (talk) 12:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated your user page for deletion because it is a copy of James Ibold. Your user page is for giving information about you as an editor, and shouldn't be used to host an article (which already exists in any case). Cordless Larry (talk) 12:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Larry, Here is the text I read about saving a copy on my userspace: Wikipedia:How to save an article proposed for deletion Make a copy of the article[edit] It may be useful to copy and paste the article into your userspace. Create a page titled User:Your username/Article name, where you can preserve the article. This way, if you wish to reintroduce it one day, you will be able to easily after appropriate changes are made. MiInReAs (talk) 18:34, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threat about a BLP. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify (having seen your previous comments about me below), the reason I removed material from the James Ibold article was not my suspicion that you have a conflict of interest, but because you had made clear that the material came from your personal knowledge of Ibold rather than published sources. You can't write about living people on Wikipedia without basing it on published, reliable sources, per WP:BLP. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Alex Shih ^Talk 13:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your intention for this apparent legal threat ([1]) if you are planning to edit again. Thanks, Alex Shih ^Talk 13:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MiInReAs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18991 was submitted on Aug 14, 2017 15:09:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section has been blanked as a courtesy.

I have revoked your talk page access as you are misusing your talk page for continuing to make legal threats. If you are planning to edit again, please submit a proper unblock request in addition to disclosing possible conflict of interest with a detailed rationale through UTRS. Alex Shih ^Talk 07:38, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re the conflict of interest, this is relevant. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]