User talk:Messiisking
Please leave a . |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
If you want to complain about something I edited, please tell me the name of the article that you are talking about. Do and I will respond, don't and I won't. Also, sign your posts.
Please try to keep it civil in here but if you want to vent off at whatever I edited, go ahead.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Messiisking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Toronto Airport
[edit]Well it's partly because of not being able to be sure which airport the person is looking for. Partly because it's the same as Montreal Airport, Calgary Airport and Edmonton Airport. Partley so that the person who isn't lloking for Pearson is saved an extra click. Partly because ther is no real reason to have two disambiguation pages for the same thing. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- They might be but I don't really know. It would be better than a second disambiguation page. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry I ment like this. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes that would do it. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- {{redirect|Toronto Airport|other airports in the Toronto area|List of airports in the Greater Toronto Area}} would do the trick. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes that would do it. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry I ment like this. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: Toronto Airport Disambugation
[edit]Hi, I see a similar discussion above. There are other redirects, e.g. Calgary Airport that redirects to List of airports in the Calgary area, etc., since there are more than one airport for these regions. By redirecting to the list rather than the most common airport, this helps writers link properly to the correct airport and prevents lazy linking. Certainly, one could always link using pipes, e.g. [[Toronto Pearson International Airport|Toronto Airport]]
. Most of the time Toronto Airport == Toronto Pearson International Airport, however not always (e.g., Toronto City Centre Airport). Redirecting to a list would also not require the "Toronto Airport redirects here" blurb at the top, which is unnecessary and distracting to new readers. Could I revert it to be similar to the other airport/city combinations (well, in Canada at least)? +mt 01:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Also, to further help people out, I'll go through the "List of airports ..." for the list/cities that I'm aware of and bold the prime airport to help readers/editors pick the main airport (which might otherwise be a redirect of this fashion). +mt 02:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Hi, I deleted your recent "Harman house" (sic) article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. If it's notable, give references. Text follows
{filming-stub}}
{db-spam}}
Harman House is a distribution chain for audio supplies in the Middle East. It supplies Harmon Kardon, JBL, and Infinity audio brands. Its headquarters are based in the Jebel Ali Free Zone in Dubai. It is owned by M.A. Fadavi. Their distribution network covers 45 countries.
[[Category:Companies of the United Arab Emirates]]
{company-stub}} —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimfbleak (talk • contribs) 05:49, 16 June 2008
- Your talk page doesn't belong in those categories, so I took the liberty of neutralising those links. Hairy Dude (talk) 19:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
This article, which you prodded a few months ago, has been restored as a contested prod at today's DRV. Just letting you know in case you wish to AFD it. Stifle (talk) 09:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Earth Hour IP vandal
[edit]Yup. I'm getting pretty irked off by that IP. --candle•wicke 23:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Seems to have stopped now if I'm not mistaken... --candle•wicke 23:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- How do you mean though? Edit conflicts are annoying but if it's constructively twisting things around there isn't anything to be done. I've left a note at the admin noticeboard so they'll catch anything suspicious if I were to go offline. --candle•wicke 00:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Portal:Current events/2009 March 28
[edit]Please stop your revert war. You are both fighting back and forth about non-critical edits and both versions are just as valid. Please take it to the Talk page or leave it alone. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 23:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]I have merged. You are guaranteed an article in the Template:In the news. Well done! Francium12 (talk) 10:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
ITN for Caspian Airlines Flight 7908
[edit]--BorgQueen (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of TekSavvy
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on TekSavvy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your last edit, please join the talk page. Thx--RayYung (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Toronto Non-Contact Hockey League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not a notable ice hockey league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Larkspurs (talk) 22:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Messiisking. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Messiisking. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hong Kong
[edit]A discussion is started at WT:AIRLINES. Please discuss there than rather reverting. 68.184.58.26 (talk) 17:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Messiisking. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, feel free to add your articles to this! † Encyclopædius 21:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of China-Thailand meme war for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China-Thailand meme war is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China-Thailand meme war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of busiest container ports, you may be blocked from editing. Talleyrand20 (talk) 22:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Greetings! It looks like you're involved in a content dispute at List of busiest container ports. I have restored the article to the status quo ante version before your bold change. I strongly suggest that you take the matter to the talk page for discussion rather than continuing to remove the flag. —C.Fred (talk) 01:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
You have reverted List of busiest container ports again without discussing the matter on the talk page or otherwise providing explanation. While I have been willing to assume good faith in your edits, you need to explain your rationale at the talk page and get consensus. Otherwise, your editing pattern is disruptive, and your account will be blocked to prevent further disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Statistics
[edit]You need to add Las Vegas Harry Reid to the 2020 worlds busiest airports list. It is missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:4B00:3C80:3493:1674:CAF6:B9B (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)