User talk:Mem271

Welcome

G'day Mem271, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 07:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mem271, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Java Hurricane 05:59, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mem271

A tag has been placed on User:Mem271 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Java Hurricane 06:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday nights

https://www.wikiclubwest.org.au/ is a start of the links to finding out JarrahTree 07:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not hesitate to contact on or off wiki with any thoughts or issues about contributions - any question is fine JarrahTree 13:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Ford (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Definitely a notable subject. There are some formatting issues, but that isn't the main problem with this article. Wikipedia articles should be written in a neutral tone, yet this one contains phrases such as "passed on her sense of colour and ideas about layering the canvas to her students." It could simply read, "had students..." without the language that makes this read like a personal essay rather than a neutral encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Ford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elizabeth Ford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mem271! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sam-2727 (talk) 13:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mem271 (talk) 03:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sam,

You seemed to think that one of my sentences was not neutral - 'Passed on her sense of colour to her students...' Sorry, but this is fact. If you look at both artists, you will read that they were influenced by Elizabeth Ford in this way. Further, to decline an article on one phrase seems rather arbitrary. Please reconsider.

please contact

either on wiki, or off - various issues have come up - also WP:SIGN worth learning at this stage... JarrahTree 03:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

make sure have an intact copy off wiki JarrahTree 10:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What JarrahTree means is that at end of comments on any Talk and at Teahouse, 'sign' you comments by typing four of ~ at the end. I have no idea what his other comments mean. David notMD (talk) 01:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elizabeth Ford has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elizabeth Ford. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 13:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Ford (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

POV issues still exist, appropriate tags have been placed in the areas that need help. Sourcing for the awards is unclear due to lack of cite and it's also unclear what awards are notable and for what reason. Wikipedia is not a compendium of every award won by somebody. The awards need to either be clearly notable (such as having a wiki article of their own) or it needs to be shown how the listing of those awards is necessary to establish the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Ford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elizabeth Ford, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mem271! You created a thread called Article rejected on the basis of a point of difference regarding neutrality? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mem271! You created a thread called ATT: Sam-2727 re-Elizabeth Ford Draft at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elizabeth Ford has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elizabeth Ford. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dorothy Newland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorothy Newland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Newland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dorothy Jean Newland, painter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dorothy Jean Newland, painter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dorothy Jean Newland, painter

Hello, Mem271. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dorothy Jean Newland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --2001:8003:841B:2E00:6510:28E4:8C83:BB89 (talk) 13:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC) this page was in process. Wikipedia is supposed to be a living encyclopedia i.e. where contributions are positively aided not vetted due to bias.[reply]

This page was created with other Wikipedia users and has not been respected.

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Ford

Hello, Mem271. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Ford".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]