User talk:Meiswikepiediaeditor

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 00:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pink Floyd History

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pink Floyd History, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Passenger pigeon (talk) 04:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tricicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meiswikepiediaeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason my edits were not disruptive Meiswikepiediaeditor (talk) 10:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

They certainly were; I'm declining your unblock request. My advice is to just sit out this block, and take the opportunity meanwhile to review our editing and article creation policies and guidelines, so that you can contribute constructively and meaningfully after your block expires. (Also, for future reference, should you ever find yourself needing to appeal a block again, note that probably the most important part of the appeal is giving us a compelling reason to unblock you. Just saying you disagree with the block isn't much of a reason, and certainly not very compelling.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access

I have blocked you also from editing this talk page, since you insist on messing around with it. You may resume editing this page once your block expires. I suggest you take a short break and find something else to do for the next 36 or so hours. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Your recent 45 edits consisted of adding a space, that was disruptive and gaming the system to become auto patrolled. Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed extended confirmed. Thanks also @DoubleGrazing for yanking TPA. I'm a slacker who went to sleep. Star Mississippi 13:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Labrador Plateau moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Labrador Plateau. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BLAR notice

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Dry Fork, Utah, likely does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Uintah_County,_Utah#Unincorporated_communities. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oak Creek, Utah

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Oak Creek, Utah, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. SunloungerFrog (talk) 14:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from YouTube Shorts into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. The "Health concerns" section was essentially copied to Instagram Reels with few alterations. I've done a dummy edit to the Reels article to provide attribution for you, but be in mind that you will still have to provide attribution if you copy from Wikipedia articles to other articles again. Thank you. ObserveOwl 🎄 (talk) 15:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]