User talk:May His Shadow Fall Upon You/Archives/2019/June
This is an archive of past discussions with User:May His Shadow Fall Upon You. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A Dobos torte for you!
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
RFC Request
Dear Fellow Wikipedian
I would like to invite you to my RFC request on the page One America News Networks. I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.
Kind Regards
Saad Ahmed2983 (talk) 11:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Scientology. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Jonathunder (talk) 21:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for your recent comment regarding recentism on the article about William Barr. It is frustrating to see people going back and back to the article almost daily, adding things that are irrelevant, and your phrase "poster child for recentism" made me laugh.Princetoniac (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Princetoniac. This article is truly a case study in recentism. The subject of the article has a long and notable career, but this small slice of it gets an inordinate amount of attention because these events are occurring right now - so every little detail gets crammed in there as if this was the only thing that ever mattered about the subject. The news cycle on this now seems to be tapering off, meaning that about a month of frenzy completely displaced decades of notable material... Cosmic Sans (talk) 15:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)