User talk:MaxnaCarta/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:MaxnaCarta. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
The Samantha murphy case
I have been watching closely this whole case unfold and while doing so I have noticed that there is one particular community member that seems to have a vendetta against a group I’ve seen online that has been assisting with the searches. I don’t know these people however I have read articles on the work that ‘ground crew’ has been doing. I’ve noticed over the past few weeks that in the response section for searches that it’s been heavily noted that the group searching was the find Samantha group however this is false. That was a discussion and speculation group and the owner of that never conducted searches this particular community member has also been causing trouble online from what I’ve read and I do not believe she should be mentioned in such a sensitive case. Just my opinion as an onlooker. PivotTruth (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also to my knowledge the PMAV also helped with the searches. Prospectors and mining association of Victoria PivotTruth (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not necessary to include. Thanks — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PivotTruth What is written is accurate and substantiated by a source. I will not become involved in the scuttlebut and brawling that occured. We only include what is reported in a secondary sourcing. The arguments in Ballarat over the different groups and their names and activity are not relevant to an encylopaedia. The paragraph is highlighting community interest and response, it does not give credit to any particular person for conducting searches. Thanks. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I’m just trying to include the information to be factual of which it is not currently https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/crime/volunteer-ground-crew-continue-to-help-victoria-police-in-search-for-samantha-murphys-body/news-story/eb825eb20563ff4a902d40a2b1d1933d?amp here is an article to show the facts. PivotTruth (talk) 01:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clean (2022 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clean (2022 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Otuọcha -- Otuọcha (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Samantha Murphy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Samantha Murphy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello MaxnaCarta,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Clean (2022 film)
Hello! Your submission of Clean (2022 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Pell v The Queen
Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pell v The Queen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Clean (2022 film)
On 3 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clean (2022 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the posthumously released documentary Clean centered on the life of Sandra Pankhurst, a former sex worker, drag queen, and crime scene cleaner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clean (2022 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clean (2022 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Clean (2022 film)
On 3 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clean (2022 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the posthumously released documentary Clean centered on the life of Sandra Pankhurst, a former sex worker, drag queen, and crime scene cleaner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clean (2022 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clean (2022 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Quinn v Jack Chia
Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quinn v Jack Chia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in WP:GARC
Hello MaxnaCarta, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jamie Beaton
The article Jamie Beaton you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Jamie Beaton for comments about the article, and Talk:Jamie Beaton/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 07:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Morphy v Land Rover
Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morphy v Land Rover, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Samantha Murphy
The article Disappearance of Samantha Murphy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disappearance of Samantha Murphy and Talk:Disappearance of Samantha Murphy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Samantha Murphy
The article Disappearance of Samantha Murphy you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Disappearance of Samantha Murphy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 03:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clean (2022 film)
The article Clean (2022 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clean (2022 film) for comments about the article, and Talk:Clean (2022 film)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Otuọcha -- Otuọcha (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Murder of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies
Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia
Hello, MaxnaCarta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)