User talk:Mauriziok/Miss World 1998

Miss Iraq 1998

Miss Iraq 1998 almost competed but Disagreement between Eric Morley and Miss Iraq Organizers made it hard for her to compete

I have a copy of the fax email me at manpreet1976@gmail.com and I can send it and u can then post it

here is the link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150753531656670&set=pb.286365506669.-2207520000.1379867054.&type=3&theater — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimrod1980 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Iraq 1998

Miss Iraq 1998 almost competed but Disagreement between Eric Morley and Miss Iraq Organizers made it hard for her to compete

I have a copy of the fax email me at manpreet1976@gmail.com and I can send it and u can then post it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.19.191.4 (talk) 10:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judges section restored

I have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is just irrelevant fancruft The Banner talk 10:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the judges section content again. It was removed with the rationale of "removed irrelevant fancruft" (diff). Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. The removal of said content under the generic rationale of "irrelevant fancruft" is ambiguous, and does nothing to improve the article. The content removal also removed proper references from the article, which also reduces the quality of the article. Many articles about competitions have information about judges. For example, see American Idol and Top Chef for starters. The Miss World events are viewed by millions of people when they occur, and dismissing content about the judges as "fancruft" does not hold water per the popularity of the event. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Miss World 1998. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/1625/newsticker4.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150627182233/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1998.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1998.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]