User talk:Mauriziok/Miss World 1988

{{Talk header}} {{WikiProject banner shell|1= {{WikiProject Beauty Pageants |class=Start |importance=Low}} {{WikiProject London |class=Start |importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Women |class=Start}} }}

Untitled

is the use of the word 'delegate' for contestants appropriate. surely delegates discus and vote, not walk around in high heels and swimsuits. Daiyounger (talk) 09:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead content restored

I have restored some content that was removed from the lead (diff), because the content is it is directly relevant and significant relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:50, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have again removed the unsourced and irrelevant fancruft. The Banner talk 17:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you will use the same generic rationale for everything. In the process, you removed three usable reliable sources that I had restored to the article after your initial removal. I have restored the sources to the article again (diff), because they certainly are not "unsourced and irrelevant fancruft"; they're independent news sources. Please stop stripping everything from articles using inaccurate rationales. It is disruptive. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored content to the lead that was again removed (diff). The content improves the quality of the article, is entirely non-contentious in nature, and is entirely about subjects that are notable per Wikipedia's standards: Peter Marshall, Alexandra Bastedo, Koreana and Donny Osmond. Information about event hosts and performers is relevant relative to the overall topic and is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. Its omission reduces the quality of the article for Wikipedia's readers. Many articles about competitions have information about hosts and entertainers for events, because they play a significant role in such events. Furthermore, it's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage. Internet coverage of 1988 events is not in abundance, because the internet was not in widespread usage at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sources have been added to the restored lead content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss World 1988. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330065920/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1988.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1988.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]