User talk:Mauriziok/Miss International 2007

Congo's participation

I included Congo in the map of participants, as well as the table of contestants, hence, bringing # of total participants up to 62. Although the Globalbeauties list down only 61 participants, Pageantopolis considers Congo. And the country's participation is further confirmed by the Contestant notes section of the article. In any case, once Congo's non-participation is confirmed, please do take the time to also edit the map. Thanks. Joey80 09:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special Award - Miss International Image

The award actually isn't a special award. It is a award voted by internet fans and is not an offical award recognized by the Miss International organization. I took off the award on the article.

Sam72991 15:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winner

Since the winner is Miss Mexico, why is Miss Philippines listed as the winner?? 68.147.195.72 21:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss International 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718140047/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/Int_2007.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/Int_2007.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]