User talk:Mauriziok/Miss International 2000

Special awards section restored

I have restored the Special awards section because its content is verified with a source that is acceptably reliable. This was removed by another user with the rationale "removed irrelevant parts/fancruft", but this notion is a personal, subjective opinion. Wikipedia is based upon what reliable sources state, and as such, sourced content has more weight compared to subjective opinion.

For further information, see WP:RELIABLE, where it states, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered." Conversely, WP:FANCRUFT is an opinion essay, and is not a Wikipedia policy or guideline. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss International 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150801090842/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/Int_2000.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/Int_2000.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]