User talk:Masterwebwiki

Hello. I want to create an article in the main space and was told that I need to stay here for 4 days and make a few edits, that's right.But I still can't do it.I am a professional and have been using language wikis for several years now.Masterwebwiki (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Masterwebwiki. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

T-34 (film)

Hello, Masterwebwiki. I have reverted your edit to this article: WP:YEARLINK says "year articles ... should not be linked unless the linked date or year has a significant connection to the subject of the linking article, beyond that of the date itself. --ColinFine (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shot (rapper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shot (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shot (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shot (rapper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shot (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shot (rapper). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vake, Fau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vake, Fau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vake, Fau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AdoTang (talk) 23:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SetPos (YouTuber)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SetPos (YouTuber), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DJRSD (talk) 16:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

SetPos (YouTuber) has been deleted
Hello, Masterwebwiki. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. SetPos (YouTuber) has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11, as it was seen as unambiguous advocacy/promotion which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Masterwebwiki. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Gribova, Angelika (model), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Masterwebwiki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Masterwebwiki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gribova, Angelika (model)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gribova, Angelika (model), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 22:37, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:discospinster Hello. You have removed the article "Gribova, Angelika (model).She is a world famous personality, has appeared in magazines, collaborates with popular brands and was awarded the title of "Miss Vogue Monaco".There are many important sources, apparently you deleted the article due to incorrect text, right? There is no information about her from her personal life, full name, place of birth and date. Therefore, I have to indicate information about her work, which you took for spam.Can I just remove the text in the biography section and restore the article, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterwebwiki (talk • contribs) 22:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who deleted the article; discospinster was the one who tagged it for deletion. As they mention in the notice above, the page was deleted under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

Can you please read my notice in the section above about paid editing disclosure and either disclose or clarify your editing? Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GorillaWarfare I read. If I rewrite my draft biography, can the article be returned? Masterwebwiki (talk) 07:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reading it is not sufficient—you need to either disclose that you are editing for pay, or clarify that I am mistaken. See the section in the notice above that begins "Regardless, if you are receiving..." GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GorillaWarfare Why did you decide what for the fee? She does not have a biography, so I decided to write her books there. Because it is not correct to keep the section empty. Please see the refutation in the article description, there are links of significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterwebwiki (talk • contribs) 17:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a simple question: are you receiving or expecting to receive compensation for any of your edits? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Significant as a model, here https://www.lofficielitalia.com/moda/angelika-gribova-intervista-modella-libro-vita-privata https://bazaarvietnam.vn/nhan-vat/con-duong-su-nghiep-cua-nguoi-mau-quoc-te-angelika-gribova/ https://lofficielbaltics.com/beauty/miss-theglam-monaco-international-2018 in Arabic [1] Masterwebwiki (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angelika Gribova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angelika Gribova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelika Gribova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:43, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing Dear, I know her because she is a global model. I could not get to know her because she has about 1 million subscribers. She simply would not have noticed me. I do not know your language, perhaps this was the conflict. Advertising- this is when there are no sources and you are trying to somehow create an article. Here you could see a lot of authoritative and exclusively on them, there was a chance to leave the article. I do not know why you blocked me. Masterwebwiki (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with her, only as a person I know and therefore I decided to write an article about her, she is a world model, she has about 1 million in the social network. She would not have noticed me and there are many significant sources about her, see precisely because of them. , I want the article to remain. Masterwebwiki (talk) 17:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GorilaWarfare Masterwebwiki (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GorillaWarfare Masterwebwiki (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are trying to appeal the block, please read the explanation above and elsewhere. Please stop pinging random editors. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give a direct link to the appeal. Masterwebwiki (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions are in the big yellow box at the top of this section. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you decide that I am plateau creating an article? I know her and that's why I wanted to. It's a pity that you suspect every participant of this, and they blocked me in vain.Masterwebwiki (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your evasiveness around my questions about paid editing and your statement at the top of this page that "I am a professional" are two of the many reasons I suspect you of being a paid editor. If you would like to appeal the block to see if another administrator disagrees with my assessment, you are welcome to, and the instructions are in the box above. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GorillaWarfare I have been creating articles for a long time, I have experience in this and therefore I am a professional volunteer. Masterwebwiki (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account was created on 24 March 2021. What other accounts have you used? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GorillaWarfare id of friends and acquaintances . Do you know why this is not an advertisement? authoritative sources, the person is known.Therefore, I decided to create an article about her. https://bazaarvietnam.vn/nhan-vat/con-duong-su-nghiep-cua-nguoi-mau-quoc-te-angelika-gribova/ https://www.grazia.rs/u-fokusu/intervju/angelika-gribova-diva-plavih-ociju https://www.lofficielitalia.com/moda/angelika-gribova-intervista-modella-libro-vita-privata https://lofficielbaltics.com/beauty/miss-theglam-monaco-international-2018 Masterwebwiki (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

Hello.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterwebwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know her. She has almost 1 million subscribers and would not notice me. There is no advertising. I like her as a model, I found important sources and decided to create an article about her. That's it! I have read all the conditions, I don’t even know your language myself, but blocking for suspicion is not competent on your part Masterwebwiki (talk) 18:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not yet answered the questions posed above. Yamla (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla The article was not paid, there was no advertising, this is your opinion. The links are really authoritative and I'm sure the article is worth staying for. I'm on the other side of the planet.

https://bazaarvietnam.vn/nhan-vat/con-duong-su-nghiep-cua-nguoi-mau-quoc-te-angelika-gribova/ https://www.grazia.rs/u-fokusu/intervju/angelika-gribova-diva-plavih-ociju https://www.lofficielitalia.com/moda/angelika-gribova-intervista-modella-libro-vita-privata https://lofficielbaltics.com/beauty/miss-theglam-monaco-international-2018

Masterwebwiki (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you send those questions here? I will translate. It is difficult for me to search for the text. I will answer Masterwebwiki (talk) 20:28, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not spam, sources will confirm that the person is famous ;) Masterwebwiki (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing your ping for you: @Yamla:.

The questions, which have been asked repeatedly now, are:

are you receiving or expecting to receive compensation for any of your edits?
what other Wikipedia accounts have you used?

Quite frankly, if you are having this much difficulty answering basic questions and communicating with members of this community, I'm not sure you will be successful here (WP:CIR). You may have more success editing the wiki for your native language. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not receive or expect to receive any compensation for any of my edits. What other Wikipedia accounts have you used? glopsy or glopsi profile, my id Masterwebwiki (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]