User talk:Manoj.Arika

Welcome!

Hello, Manoj.Arika, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Nishabdham did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ab207 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm SP013. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nishabdham, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sources clearly state that the film is shot both in Telugu and Tamil making it a bilingual so in the top it should be as an Indian film not Telugu language film SP013 (talk) 16:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm KRtau16. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aksai Chin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. KRtau16 (talk) 11:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalki 2898AD (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Grabup were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalki 2898AD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grabup (talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Grabup I want to replace the passage in wikipedia about kalki 2898 AD Manoj.Arika (talk) 04:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Manoj.Arika, There is already a Wikipedia page on this film. See Kalki 2898 AD. Grabup (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add 'film industries' in articles, we do not categorize films as such. The precedent is mentioning the language, which we already do. Gotitbro (talk) 11:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Manoj.Arika! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Grabup (talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]