User talk:Müdigkeit

Welcome!

Hello, Müdigkeit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja-Square

I normally only salt after three recreations, but I've done so here after two because I've also indefinitely blocked the creator of the second version for a violation of our user name policy. The original creator may or may not be the same person, but there is no overlap at all between their edits, so no grounds for action at present. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the article(that was the talk page) was already created four times, and had been salted.--Müdigkeit (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket guidelines

I note that you've made a number of edits since those posts, but you haven't yet entered the discussion at WT:CRICKET to clarify those guidelines. Trusting this is just an omission, I figured on dropping a reminder. Ravenswing 13:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it, drop it already!

Hey Müdigkeit, stop harassing people with your crap! Drop it already! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.51.95.188 (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders

No consensus on his religion[1] clearly goes back to the status quo before the edit warriors showed up, which was inclusion. See for example [2] -- Kendrick7^talk 19:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. Consensus can change, and it even can change that way that there is no longer one(in this case, for keeping it). And if there is no consensus, WP:ONUS applies, User:Kendrick7.--Müdigkeit (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, there doesn't appear to be a consensus; WP:PRESERVE applies. :) -- Kendrick7^talk 20:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kendrick7: Can you tell me why WP:Preserve applies? WP:Preserve does not include material that should not be in the article at all, and there is no consensus yet for keeping or removal, which means, per WP:ONUS, and WP:BLP, that the needed consensus to keep something in the article hasn't been reached- which means removal. --Müdigkeit (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello how are you. I have a question, Is the new RfC: Religion in infoboxes applied also in infoboxes of nations?. Have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, however, if you think there are good reasons to exempt nations in some circumstances or treat them differently, you could try to get consensus about that. After all, Consensus can change, especially if you have new arguments.--Müdigkeit (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: New Page Reviewer user right

A discussion is taking place to request that New Page Patrollers be suitably experienced for patrolling new pages. Your comments at New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.

Just to recap:

13 July 2016: 7,000
1 August 2016: 9,000
7 August 2016: 10,472
16 August 2016: 11,500
28 August 2016: 13,158

You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Müdigkeit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Müdigkeit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]