User talk:Loveforwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Loveforwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hi, I have seen that you have persistently made non-constructive edits to MS Dhoni. The article is a listed good article and headings are in an agreed standard format. Please refrain from altering titles without due reason, introducing unnecessary headings, or making any such non-constructive edits.

Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 06:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sandeep Reddy Vanga, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Hi! This is in regards to your edits to M S Dhoni.

The article is a GA and has gone through he process to be listed there and the heads are in line with the layout of other similar articles.
The records and achievements are indeed individual as the article pertains to a person and no need to mention as such and introduce an unnecessary sub-category.
Why does national honors alone warrant a separate section? All the other honors are also national or international, why special classification for those three? Do not do a random selective classification as per your whims.

Please stop making non-constructive contributions such as adding unnecessary additional sub-headings and push your POV on how the section should exist. You have already been warned of non-constructive and disruptive editing previously. So, do not engage in an unnecessary EDITWAR and if you want to change something, request you to engage in a discussion on the article's talk page to gain CONSENSUS. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of History of Varanasi

The article History of Varanasi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Largely a copy-pasted version of Varanasi#History and the lead, to which this page acted as a redirect. An unnecessary fork.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of Varanasi is so long. So it needs a seperate page. And need more contents. Loveforwiki (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop.

If you continue to edit tendentiously and counter to consensus, you may be blocked from editing. You need to understand that Wikipedia operates by WP:CONSENSUS and not by whatever you think is right, and consensus at Redirects for Discussion was clear that the redirect should be targeted to the political alliance per our titling policies (see WP:DIFFCAPS) Cremastra (talk) 22:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can Wikipedia redirect a country's name to a political alliance which is formed few months ago. Even earlier alliance "UPA" was not redirected to United Progressive Alliance. Then how can INDIA (which is a country name) redirects to this alliance. Even CHINA redirects China. USA, US, AMERICA redirect to United States. Loveforwiki (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the discussion: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_June_4#INDIA. Cremastra (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you guys want. No discussion matters after all. At the end, only thing will be written in the Wikipedia what left leaning supporters want. goodbye Loveforwiki (talk) 02:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History of Varanasi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to History of Varanasi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Senior Wikipedia members should improve the article Loveforwiki (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Public image of Narendra Modi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid misleading edit summaries

In this edit, you deleted a substantial amount of well-sourced information with the highly misleading edit summary updation of social media followers. Please avoid doing this, see WP:SUMMARYNO. Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Varanasi

WP plays by certain rules, one of which is not edit warring. You attempted to make a new edit that in my view is not consonant with either the tenor of the lead, nor with the prose. I reverted it. Per WP:BRD and WP:ONUS, please make a case for your edit on Talk:Varanasi and attempt to achieve a consensus for it. As I stated in my edit summary, a new consensus takes time, at least a week, and sometimes more.

Please also read WP:Lead fixation. A lead is typically a distilled summary, not a place for general facts and figures. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 10:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hi Loveforwiki! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. You're using the minor edit checkbox on nearly every edit, and most of them are not minor edits. [1] is a recent example. Please only use the check box for truly minor edits using the critieria in WP:MINOREDIT. Ravensfire (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok i understood sir Loveforwiki (talk) 14:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit [2] is not a minor edit. Read the linked page in the message above about what is and is not a minor edit and follow those guidelines. Ravensfire (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you've continued to do it [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ayodhya_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=1244470503 with this edit. So clearly you haven't understood. Just don't use the minor checkbox please. Ravensfire (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Production of Baahubali films moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Production of Baahubali films. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Sending to draft as an WP:ATD. Not sure if this is a page about the production of the films or a page about the franchise but it is essentially an unecessary WP:CFORK. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Baahubali (franchise) into Draft:Production of Baahubali films. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited S. Jaishankar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Changed it Loveforwiki (talk) 08:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Christopher Nolan

added a link pointing to Deadline

Pankaj Tripathi

added a link pointing to IIFA

Priyadarshan

added a link pointing to Telugu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

You were previously told about attribution in a thread above. You did not do so here with this page creation. Can you please address this issue? CNMall41 (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the long read of T series filmography, i created a seperate page. It will be easy to read decade wise. You can check that and improve if any issues. Thanks. Loveforwiki (talk) 01:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article Stree 2 did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. RangersRus (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok noted Loveforwiki (talk) 18:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on India. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not in edit war. sorry Loveforwiki (talk) 04:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your name is Awesome.

are You Indian are You fan of Hindi Tv Series Mangal Lakshmi & Parineti etc?(49.205.117.20 (talk) 04:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)).[reply]

Awesome

Your name is Awesome.

are You Indian are You fan of Hindi Tv Series Mangal Lakshmi & Parineti etc?(59.97.1.7 (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)).[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald Ok Loveforwiki (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rajini, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop breaking the disambiguation pages Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Public image of Narendra Modi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Ratnahastin (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know Wikipedia policies... i only removed the things which is irrelevant because of Court verdicts of Modi image. Which is deliberately added by an IP user. Loveforwiki (talk) 04:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Sarai Kale Khan, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Ratnahastin (talk) 14:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added contents with reliable sources. The user who reverted things before me was adding things with no sources. Loveforwiki (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Panchayat (TV series) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. - Ratnahastin (talk) 10:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was too long in main page. It's better to seperate it another page. Loveforwiki (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your second warning for not attributing from where you copied. Do you understand the above message? This is something you have to do each time you copy within Wikipedia. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:18, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Femke I didn't understand the concept oldid revision. Please help to that page as per Wikipedia policy. Loveforwiki (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:oldid is usually not necessary when you copy from another page. You just need to provide the above text in an edit summary. When you forget attribution, you can do a dummy edit (an edit that basically changes nothing, only a space or so) and write the same edit summary. Oldid is only necessary when the page you copied from has changed.

Do you now understand when you need to add this edit summary? Could you explain in your own words? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARE report

There's a complaint filed against you. See: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Capitals00 (talk) 04:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uttar Pradesh

Feel free to make relevant changes where you find necessary. However, please ensure that the entire article is not focused solely on Hinduism. Good luck.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 20:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't changed anything on UP about Hinduism. Few days back i seperated the long headers Loveforwiki (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if my words sounded confusing. What I wanted to convey is, please do not hesitate to make changes where you find necessary. Actually, in the past, there were a couple of IP users who wanted to focus solely on Hinduism part of the state. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 12:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are indefinitely topic banned from India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned As a result of this AE report.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:05, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but what edits i have done is not reliable. I always edits with sources. Loveforwiki (talk) 12:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are topic banned that means from now onwards you cannot edit anything related to India. Pakistan and Afghanistan. This is a violation of your topic ban, if you edit anything related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan again, you may be blocked from editing. - Ratnahastin (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But why this happened?? I didn't violated any rules. I always edit with sources. Loveforwiki (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You ignored questions at the AE report, and didn't make any compelling case to explain why your edits were not unconstructive. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What report??? I don't know so much deep laws and rules like it's some court. Many users are attacking and accusing me unnecessary. I always add or remove contents based on reliable sources. Kindly remove my ban. Looks like there's any fixed agenda how the articles will be written for particular case. Well, please remove my ban. And give me last chance. Loveforwiki (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This report, which was linked in the above notice. You responded there once, so you were aware of it. The above notice also describes how you can appeal this topic ban. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Femke, I hope you are doing well. I was just wondering, since new users may not be aware of all the rules, can we consider giving them a chance to improve their edits? Because not letting them improve themselves in the name of hardcore rules will convey nothing but harsh punishment. Let me know if I can be of any help.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 21:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i was not aware with Wikipedia HARDCORE RULEA AND LAWS. Give me last chance. Remove my ban please. Where to appeal??? Loveforwiki (talk) 02:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can appeal either at User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish (the admin who imposed the ban) or at WP:AE. A full appeal is very unlikely to be successful at this point, as there are open questions around loveforwiki's willingness to learn (such as answering my request to show they understand when to give attribution in an edit summary above). An appeal should demonstrate that you understand why you were banned (for instance, giving misleading edit summaries), and how you will prevent these mistakes in the future. A period of problem-less editing outside of the topic area helps to demonstrate this. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Your edit to Amitabh Bachchan violated your topic ban from India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed. Accordingly, I have blocked you for 72 hours. You are not permitted to make any such edits. Cullen328 (talk) 05:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy What are you talking about??? Where i abused anybody??? I was allowed to edit except Indian Subcontinent contents. Unblock me. Loveforwiki (talk) 07:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveforwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was allowed to edit excluding Indian subcontinent. I didn't abuse anybody. Why i am blocked completely? Why i am being targeted for no certain serious reason? Why ?. Unblock me please Loveforwiki (talk) 07:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Leaving aside that this is a checkuser block(meaning that it is supported with private technical evidence), the behavior (including your post below) makes it clear that this isn't a big coincidence. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have evaded your topic ban by creating a sock and getting blocked on it too. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki and block log of your sockpuppet[3]. - Ratnahastin (talk) 07:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin I am not that guy... why you people are so interested in targeting me unnecessary. Wikipedia seems only belongs to one leftist POV. I add materials with sources, not something without manually. Loveforwiki (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin The way i have been described in the investigation. Many other users also have similar agenda to write against particular political parties and leaders. The matter should have sources. That's it. Problem is, i write truth with sources and make other big users narrative wrong. That's the problem of them including you, @fowler&fowler and several others who harassed me and targetting unnecessary. Loveforwiki (talk) 07:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]