User talk:Lopbunny69

Welcome!

Hi Lopbunny69! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MPW self promotion

HI lopbunny, I have changed username name as you requested. Why do you keep undoing the edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti-Fraud inspector (talk • contribs) 23:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC) @Anti-Fraud inspector , still a bad name. Lopbunny69 (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does it violate wikipedias policy on names? Anti-Fraud inspector (talk 00:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anti-Fraud inspector , I do not know but I feel like it does. However, it does make me uncomfortable. Lopbunny69 (talk) 00:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lopbunny69 clearly a fraudster with a conflict of interest. 2600:1700:8660:E180:810F:4EE6:EF97:C7CB (talk) 00:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Me or him????? Lopbunny69 (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello. Regarding the recent reverts you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. EthanGaming7640 (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC) ok Lopbunny69 (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, to piggyback on this, I noticed you are still reverting a lot of problematic edits which is great. However you're still not using these templates. When you just revert edits without explaining what people did wrong, it's hard for them to learn. If you have RedWarn it's super easy to write these warnings, you just need to go on their talk page and select the template and reason as well as level of warning. Keep up the good work fighting vandalism though. :) --TylerBurden (talk) 17:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

takes too much time to copy, also most edits that I revert just say "gay" "pee" "your mom" and "poo". Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you use RedWarn it takes a few seconds, it's worth it because even if you don't expect them to learn anything having the warnings on their pages make them more likely to be dealt with by administrators since they can see that vandals have kept going despite recieving warnings. I've gotten multiple vandals blocked today after reporting them when they continued past my level-4 warning. --TylerBurden (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC) OH ok Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spizzenergi

Yes I know the edit summary was a bit irreverent but that was actually a contructive edit. Molly Spiers MacLeod is indeed playing as "Stunt Bass Doris" in the band I, Doris.2.24.70.135 (talk) 17:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Have added a source. 2.24.70.135 (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hey 👋 how are you 🙂😁🤗

I am new here 😔😭 Sarthak Raut (Donad BK) (talk) 21:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Horror film 1970s–1980s

The article Horror film can you split the 1970s–1980s so the timeline section be normal like this
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
Era doysteeieidk RS dresses to earsrorork TS ta to take to that's to (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC) sussy username Lopbunny69 (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why did you not take my barnstar?

@Bbb23: just wanna know. Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

Please review the instructions at the top of the WP:UAA page. A potentially problematic username should generally not be reported until the account has edited with some exceptions for extremely vulgar names). Thanks 331dot (talk) 17:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: ok sorry I thought that urmom jokes are not funny. Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right, but the account should still have edited first. That type of username is not offensive enough to warrant immediate blocking without having edited. Certain vulgar words( would fall in that category, but that's a minority of usernames. 331dot (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Thanks for telling me I will wait some time until they edit or they have an edit filter log. Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

?

confused about this. Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lopbunny69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not related to this user related to nobody Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

On the one hand, you say you have no other accounts. Then you subsequently admit that you do indeed have other accounts. Regardless, there's no chance of an unblock unless you fully address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlMichaels1727. Yamla (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

my bad, forgot about old accounts Toketaa and Toketaa1, lost the pass for one and did not like the username for the other so I made a new account. Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lopbunny69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said I forgot those two. I am not related to AlMichaels, I just edited similarly to him. Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Request is now moot per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is a waste of time. TPA access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jungkook420 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jungkook420. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]