User talk:Lokpali
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Lokpali! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Lokpali. Thank you for your work on Dhadkai. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good start! whenever adding population, please use government official census sources. https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dcotos (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Dcotos Thank you. Will surely use this for my future contributions on articles related to places. Lokpali (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Rehmatullah Padder moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Rehmatullah Padder. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Lokpali. Thank you for your work on Chatroo. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 21:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Appeal
[edit]
Lokpali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have carefully reviewed the details of the sockpuppet investigation (SPI) and noticed that I am being accused of impersonating a sockpuppet. I am genuinely unsure how this conclusion has been reached, as I am unfamiliar with the concept of sockpuppetry in-depth. I firmly believe these allegations are unfounded.
An administrator has claimed that I operate multiple accounts, which is entirely false. I am new to Wikipedia, but I have made a sincere effort to contribute meaningfully. My familiarity with basic coding allowed me to quickly grasp the use of Wikitext, enabling me to create and edit articles that meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
Regarding my recent article that was moved to the draft space, I respected the decision of the experienced user and continued editing within the draft. I later submitted it for the Articles for Creation (AfC) process, adhering to Wikipedia’s protocols as I understand them.
As for the sockpuppet investigation, I am at a loss as to why I am being linked to it. I request that my editing history and the articles I have created be thoroughly reviewed. Many experienced editors have previously appreciated my work during the review process, as noted on my talk page.
I respectfully request that you consider my appeal and review this matter carefully, as I have always strived to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and contribute positively to the community.
Thank you for your time and understanding. Bests Lokpali (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. Your denial does not outweigh this technical evidence. PhilKnight (talk) 15:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.