User talk:Liz617
Welcome
[edit]
|
Foreign Language Annals
[edit]Thanks for the Foreign Language Annals article! It's looking good. :) Let me know if you have any questions about Wikipedia, and I'll be happy to help you out. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 23:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sociological Quarterly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of St. Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Human development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tolerance and Diversity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
advice about conflict of interest editing
[edit]It appears to me that you are engaged in editing with a conflict of interest on behalf of Wiley, as all the articles you have been writing a Wiley journals. I don;t think your editing is necessarily improper, but I do need to caution you about our rules. The page that best expresses our current policy is the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, which advises you in strong terms to use to Articles for Creation process. However, you seem to be editing in general in an appropriate manner, and there is no absolute requirement to use the AfC process. (In fact, the AfC process is currently in a state of great inconsistency, as anyone can review an article, whether or not they do it competently). So, although as an administrator with an great interest in the subject of academic journals, I must make you aware of what the current practice, I would also advise you that you are safe in continuing to write directly, and probably should continue to do that. (If challenged, let me know).
I say this because, as far as I can tell, they are appropriate subjects for articles meeting our normal notability requirements. , but I think you may be unduly copying the usually routine statement of interest from the journal web site; usually the scope of the journal is self explanatory, but the alternatives are to rewrite it in a different way, or if no such way is possible, to quote it with a reference.
There are one or two other points. Since , according to WP:PROF, being the editor in chief of an academic journal is proof of notability, it would be very helpful if you would list the successive editors in chief, as well as the present one. (only editors in chief, not editorial board). It's also good practice to give their academic affiliation. We normally list only major indexes, not all of them--that kind of list is for the journal website. And you seem to be using some 2011 impact factors--could you please update them to 2012.
You may want to consult our guide at Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide, and consider participating.
And, of course, if you really want to help in a way that will deflect any possibly unfriendly comments about conflict of interest, perhaps it would be good to also write articles about some other journals in the same general areas. If you need any assistance, please ask me directly on my user talk page. -- I'm unlikely to see any questions posted elsewhere. DGG ( talk ) 02:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- I agree completely with DGG's advice. In particular, I would appreciate if you could read the Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. I have now quite a list of journal articles created by you that need cleanup and it would be a big help if you could do this yourself. Also, please don't add non-existing categories. Go to your preferences and activate HotCat, it's a very useful tool and will suggest to you categories and warn you if a cat does not exist. Sometimes it's just a matter of capitalization, I just changed Category:Political Science Journals to Category:Political science journals in a bunch of recently-created articles. Also, your articles contain reference sections that are completely empty. Please only add such a section if there are actually any references. Also, it's inadvisable to create bare stubs as you done, that do not show why a journal should be included here (for our criteria, see WP:NJournals). The stubs that you are creating risk to be proposed for deletion in their current state. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Liz617. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)