User talk:Litraj

Litraj, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Litraj! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Articles for Creation

Please stop removing content, sources and review templates from draft articles at Article for Creation, as you did with Fionnuala_Collins, Hans Nordin, Brendan Creaby, Dewey's Pizza, for example. It may not have been your intention, but these edits are disruptive to the process of assessing articles, particularly when you remove review request templates and useful sources. If you want to help at AfC can I suggest you read the Reviewers Instructions and follow these.

A far better solution would be for you to work on other parts of Wikipedia until you have gained a bit of experience. Thankyou. Sionk (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Litraj. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by SarahStierch (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Litraj. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Literary Juice.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) Don 00:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Litraj. You have new messages at Dcshank's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, a week ago I was told the listing at SabotageReviews was a good reference for my article, which is why I left it. It is a review site, not a blog. But I will certainly search for replacements for the others. I hope I responded to this correctly!

Teahouse

Hello, Litraj. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Bilby (talk) 02:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

I also added some perspective to that question. --Jayron32 03:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Litraj. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by hajat vrc @ 18:05, 7 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Reply to comment at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Literary Juice

Hi Litraj,

You are correct many large newpapers and magazine Blogs are powered by WordPress. That still makes them a blogs. The information does necessarily come under editorial review, and therefore can not be considered reliable. The step beyond this is that sabotagereviews.com is not only powered by WordPress, it is hosted by WordPress, which I believe is a free service. -- :- ) Don 20:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Literary Juice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zach Vega (talk to me) 00:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. -- :- ) Don 00:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]