User talk:Lincolning
"#" vs "No."
[edit]I started a discussion on the topic here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#"No." vs "#" abbreviation and MOS:NUMBERSIGN. X96lee15 (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Colors
[edit]Lincolning, if you're going to do this, please use |border=0|color=white}}
or |border=0|color=black}}
after the team name. A majority of the colors were not compliant with WP:CONTRAST. Another option is to use {{NCAA color cell}}, which doesn't add a border and automatically takes into contrast of either black or white font. You can see my example here. If you want to use a secondary color, use {{NCAA secondary color cell}}. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 18:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- I understand what you are saying and do use {{NCAA color cell}} when appropriate Corkythehornetfan. However, as you can see from this the colors were already similar, I just used the {{CollegePrimaryStyle}} instead of simple colors. FYI, this is a rampant issue on these pages. I originally used only used {{NCAA color cell}}, but had it repeatedly changed by other users. Lincolning (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- EDIT: Using the Colour Contrast Analyser, East Carolina's {{CollegePrimaryStyle}} meets the WCAG 2 AA Compliant requirements and WCAG 2 AAA 18+. I believe this is sufficient, but let me know if you disagree. Lincolning (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- That's fine... UCF is "sort of... compliant" as well as East Carolina. UCF is easier to read than East Carolina (it's too bold and can hardly be read). I like consistency (it's an OCD thing ) and tend to use {{CollegePrimaryStyle}} but keeping the fonts in black/white (just my personal preference). I believe Frietjes has fixed the issue now with NCAA color cell. Before, it wouldn't do automatic contrast but now it does. I'm game to leave them with the secondary color font. I did change Cincinnati's color to the secondary color to separate from UConn's closely-related colors. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- The compliance protocol states that it should reach at least WCAG 2.0's AA level, and AAA level when feasible, which UCF meets. I note that {{NCAA color cell}} for Illinois is not compliant and does not show white as on 2016–17 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season#Rankings. Can't get it to change no matter what. Lincolning (talk) 22:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- That's fine... UCF is "sort of... compliant" as well as East Carolina. UCF is easier to read than East Carolina (it's too bold and can hardly be read). I like consistency (it's an OCD thing ) and tend to use {{CollegePrimaryStyle}} but keeping the fonts in black/white (just my personal preference). I believe Frietjes has fixed the issue now with NCAA color cell. Before, it wouldn't do automatic contrast but now it does. I'm game to leave them with the secondary color font. I did change Cincinnati's color to the secondary color to separate from UConn's closely-related colors. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- EDIT: Using the Colour Contrast Analyser, East Carolina's {{CollegePrimaryStyle}} meets the WCAG 2 AA Compliant requirements and WCAG 2 AAA 18+. I believe this is sufficient, but let me know if you disagree. Lincolning (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]Hi Lincolning, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 21:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! Lincolning (talk) 21:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)