User talk:Leon McLane

Don't capitalize Words randomly

As you did here AGAIN. --Niemti (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't vandalize articles. --Niemti (talk) 11:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resident Evil 4, 5, Revelations, 6 and The Mercenaries 3D

Please stop adding in "third-person shooter" in the later Resident Evil games. They do have a third-person prespective view but it's not entirely focused as a third-person shooter as it also includes a first-person perspective view as well and therefore it does not qualify as a third-person shooter as a whole. I've already explained this with another user and he understood what I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.36.234 (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop adding in "third-person shooter" in the later Resident Evil games. They do have a third-person prespective view but it's not entirely focused as a third-person shooter as it also includes a first-person perspective view as well and therefore it does not qualify as a third-person shooter as a whole. I've already explained this with another user and he understood what I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.36.234 (talk) 12:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please stop adding in "third-person shooter" in the later Resident Evil games. They do have a third-person prespective view but it's not entirely focused as a third-person shooter as it also includes a first-person perspective view as well and therefore it does not qualify as a third-person shooter as a whole. I've already explained this with another user and he understood what I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.36.234 (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, please stop adding in "third-person shooter" in the later Resident Evil games. They do have a third-person prespective view but it's not entirely focused as a third-person shooter as it also includes a first-person perspective view as well and therefore it does not qualify as a third-person shooter as a whole. I've already explained this with another user and he understood what I said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.37.185 (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Resident Evil 6. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Calling me a sob isn't very nice. Soetermans. T / C 13:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 5. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. And also with other Resident Evil articles, STOP adding third-person shooter without a general consensus. Soetermans. T / C 11:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 4, you may be blocked from editing. Soetermans. T / C 11:36, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 5, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Soetermans. T / C 11:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leon McLane. You have new messages at Soetermans's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You Too!?

You love resident evil, too! That's awesome! I love the Resident Evil franchise. Deidra C.(leave a message!)17:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello Leon McLane. Welcome to the English Wikipedia
Thank you for registering! After some observation, I've noticed that you're probably new. We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and/or guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talkpage of the article. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, feel free to ask an expierienced Wikipedian for assistance like-, User:Buster7, User:Cindamuse, User:Ryan Vesey. I'm pretty sure that they will like help you. Don't ask me- I'm just here to welcome you! Have a great time here at Wikipedia! Here are some useful links and policies that will guide you through Wikipedia.↓↓↓ I will speak to you about adopters soon.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing or in the editing interface tool box, located just above the editing window (when editing). Do not sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted, but only when using the article talkpage, yours or another editor's talkpage. Another valuable page that may provide information and assistance is User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles ask the expierienced users. Again, welcome! Deidra C.(leave a message!)17:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]

April 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 4. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing your talk page pop up after the Resident Evil 4 revert was odd, with an IP editor warning you not to add unsourced genre changes. It's been a while, but all your edits are nicely kept. Please don't go on with your past edits. These games simply are not considered third-person shooters and/or action-adventure games. If you have a source, go ahead and add it. Otherwise your edits are bound to be reverted. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheDeviantPro (talk) 07:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheDeviantPro (talk) 12:27, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop, you have been asked the take this to the article's talk page and you're still are making these disruptive edits on the article. It looks like you have did this before to other Resident Evil articles years ago which you were asked to stop by other editors for doing the same thing on those articles. So stop, you been warned many times and a continue of disruptive editing will result of a block by an admin. Thanks TheDeviantPro (talk) 01:26, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game). Once again, Third-person shooter is NOT the primary genre. Yes the game is played in third person. Many other games are played in third person but those are not classified Third-person shooters because it's not the primary genre for those games. The reason why Resident Evil 4, 5 & 6 is a considered Third-person shooter as an primary genre because they are more action than survival horror games unlike Resident Evil 2 remake which is more survival horror than action. So stop with the disruptive editing and discuss on article talk page. TheDeviantPro (talk) 10:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]