User talk:Leo de facto

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources - random websites like 1kayastha.com are not acceptable sources. Also, the infobox parameter to which you are adding varna categorization of the caste is not meant for that information. Please go through WP:TUTORIAL if you haven't already. utcursch | talk 20:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

--regentspark (comment) 11:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban from castes and social groups

For persistent disruptive editing editing to glorify particular groups, and for the totally unacceptable personal attacks in these edit summaries:[1][2][3], I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages related to castes and social groups. Please read WP:TBAN to see what a topic ban is.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 15:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WP:ANI. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for WP:NOTHERE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leo de facto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no fair. Uh uh no fair Bigga blocking me for this !! “As per Puranic literature, Chitragupta had two wives- Devi Shobhavati, who was daughter of a Brahmin Susharma and Devi Nandini who was daughter of a Kshatriya Shradhadev Manu respectively.[1][2]“ No lie. Books true that.

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.