User talk:Leiobunum rotundum

This is Leiobunum rotundum's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Leiobunum rotundum! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cimicodes sanguiflua has been accepted

Cimicodes sanguiflua, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cimicodes sanguiflua

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Cimicodes sanguiflua has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/details/descriptionsofne00hewi/page/232/mode/2up?q=Cimicodes+sanguiflua&view=theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gallaba (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is currently supported by only 1 source, please add more reliable source who indicate clearly notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gallaba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leiobunum rotundum! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gallaba has been accepted

Gallaba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gonogramma lemoulti has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gonogramma lemoulti. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gonogramma lemoulti has been accepted

Gonogramma lemoulti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mimallonidae

A couple of notes for you about {{Mimallonidae-stub}}:

Firstly, please note that templates are not allowed to be filed in redlinked categories, such as Category:Mimallonidae stubs — they are only allowed to use categories that exist. But that category can't be created at this time, either, as stub categories are not allowed to exist until they already have at least 60 articles to go in them, and there aren't 60 possible articles for a Mimallonidae stubs category yet.
Secondly, even the template itself shouldn't be sitting unused, either: if you want to create a stub template, then you have to take on the responsibility of going around adding that template to the articles that need it, and it can be deleted as unused if you fail to do that.

So for both of those reasons, you need to leave its category as "moth stubs", not "mimallonidae stubs", until such time as the template is already on at least 60 articles — and even if and when it does get to 60, the dedicated mimallonidae stubs category will still have to be proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting and cannot just be created willy-nilly by just anybody without approval. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]