User talk:Legendary T.H.U.G.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Khoikhoi 19:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You need to show nuff respect to the thugz. Legendary T.H.U.G. 19:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Khoikhoi 19:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You sayin' givin much props to tha THUGZ is nonsense? Please read Thug article. Legendary T.H.U.G. 19:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Khoikhoi 21:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Khoikhoi 16:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You need to explain how what I've done is vandalism. You aren't discussing this civilly, and you're coming across as a hysterical anti-thug hater. Legendary T.H.U.G. 16:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see an explanation from Legendary T.H.U.G why adding the category thugs is ok and necessary. Otherwise, I am inclined to view it as vandalism as well.--YellowLeftHand 17:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One might view at as somewhat informal, but the same could be said of Category:Eccentrics, not to mention many other categories on Wikipedia. It's a useful signifier to people, letting them know who is and is not a tru thug. Legendary T.H.U.G. 17:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked and it doesn't appear that Thugs is a Wiki category (not saying I think it shouldn't be). --YellowLeftHand 17:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An anti-rap hater deleted it. Legendary T.H.U.G. 17:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]