User talk:Last Lost

Speedy Tag

On the Narshiology I changed the speedy tag you added from {{db-nonsense}} to {{db-hoax}} as it didn't meet the criteria, best Mo ainm~Talk 23:21, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MoVal numbers

No sweat. I figured the 2010 census numbers will come up sooner or later, so the old estimate is as good as the old one. --S. Rich (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HHO

I see that you are reverting edits on the HHO page without participating in the related discussions on the talk page. This is disruptive, so please stop. If you wish to express your opinion and work toward consensus, you are invited to participate on the talk page. Rklawton (talk) 23:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ABUSE

What an amazing example of behavior from a wikipedia old-timer. And what really pisses me off, I cannot file a formal complaint about his behavior, since it requires two victims of abuse. And he may continue running around with false accusations. Therefore I decided to abandon this topic owned by disrespectful people.

You have another person now who is victim of abuse and who can never establish a meaningful discussion without being insulted. Now you have two ....if you are interested e-mail me since I am sure RKLawton will block me again. Can one editor alone block? my e-mail is jistat6769@gmail.com JOHNISTAT (talk)JOHN ISTATJOHNISTAT (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC). By the way, his page is an advertisement of his business....is this a policy of Wikipedia? JOHNISTAT (talk)JOHNISTATJOHNISTAT (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Privacy fencing with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreed. Last Lost (talk) 17:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Fence, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Railing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Branding iron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Round-up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Animal body water

The article Animal body water has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Body water is a physiological concept that does not differ between humans and animals. Anything that can be said for "animal" body water can also be said for human body water, and vice versa. The generic body water article can clarify that it applies to animals, too, as it should.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Attaboy (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Animal body water for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animal body water is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal body water until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Attaboy (talk) 05:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]