User talk:LakshMohan

Hello, LakshMohan, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ElonWiki77 (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LakshMohan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir I am new to Wikipedia and I accept my mistake and really believe me it was just a mistake not spamming, I will correct everything what I did and will never do this again. Really believe me I didn't knew the policies. Please remove this ban. I will make sure this will not happen again. Its a humble request to you. Thankyou

Decline reason:

It was not a mistake, it was deliberate spamming. If you can explain why your edits were inappropriate and explain how future edits will be different, you are welcome to make another unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LakshMohan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir I can explain..I made those edits just to refer those articles which co-relate with them..I like to write articles..I keep on posting on different platforms like-Quora etc. Sir believe me, M a genuine user. I apologise for those links..I will not do this again..Give me just one chance..I will edit only where it will be necessary..What can I do to prove myself?..I Thank you Sir..

Decline reason:

Sorry, but your editing was pure and blatant spam. Your only edits were to promote your own website, which Wikipedia is WP:NOT for. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have a conflict of interest, as you've been linking to your own website. At the moment, it's not remotely clear you understand even why your edits were inappropriate. Instead of accepting your edits were inappropriate, you appear to be trying to argue that linking to your block was appropriate. It wasn't. It was blatant WP:SPAM. --Yamla (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LakshMohan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir what can I do now? How can I correct my mistake? Sir tell me something which can I do to make a fresh start from this account only. Thank you

Decline reason:

see below

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. LakshMohan (talk) 04:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the first response, it says that you should explain what you did wrong and how you'll avoid it in the future. You haven't done this yet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LakshMohan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made so much edits in one day which was not right. Now I have understood. In future, I will make one or two edits, not more than that. I will not repeat it again. That's ok Sir? LakshMohan (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As stated above, you, need to prove that you understand how and why your edits were inappropriate. There is no indication yet that you are willing to do that. Another request unwilling to do so, like those above, and you may lose access to this talkpage. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:15, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Comment: Since the user obviously doesn't get it, I suggest declining the two new unblock requests and removing TPA... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My edits were inappropriate because they seem to be spam. I made many edits in a single day. The links were of a single site only which was not right. I made the edits in an unfair manner. Now I have understood. LakshMohan (talk) 07:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not the only problem. Hint: WP:COI. --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I have tried many times, not a single time. I requested you all for an unblock. I tried everything what can I do. I didn't understood what you really want? Sir think, if I don't wanted to correct myself then I would have created a fake account from different IP. I didn't do that. Sir I really want to come back. It's my last message. Sir now if you think am a genuine user or not, now it's your choice to unblock or not. I tried many times. Sorry for what I did. Thank you 🙏

LakshMohan (talk) 07:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been linking to your own website. This is a violation of WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:SPAM and a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. We've pointed this out to you repeatedly but you've never once accepted this or shown you understand why this is inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]