User talk:Aishanijoon

This is Aishanijoon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludmila Yamalova (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludmila Yamalova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LYLAWDubai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 15:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Ludmila_Yamalova. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. qcne (talk) 15:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your message. To clarify, this is not an autobiography, but a biography of the person, which has been tagged appropriately in the process of submission. As per Wikipedia’s notability criteria, I have provided reliable sources where the subject has been a notable contributor, such as media houses like The New York Times, Bloomberg, Financial Times, and Gulf News, wherein the subject was invited to be an expert commentator and contributor.

I am happy to add more such references, but these are our strongest points. This is for clarification, in case the assumption that this is an autobiography, affected the reputable sources listed.

Thank you. LYLAWDubai (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LYLAWDubai in that case, your username contravenes our username policy as usernames cannot represent an organisation. Please request a username change at Wikipedia:Changing username.

Your sources do not yet show notability as most are not independent of Ludmila. qcne (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your feedback. I have requested for a username change as per Wikipedia policy, and resubmitted the article with sources independent of Ludmila. Thanks again! LYLAWDubai (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You must also make a paid-editing disclosure immediately. I will post instructions below. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am confused whether this is classified as a paid activity or whether I should disclose my COI for the reason that the subject is the founder of the firm I work at, i.e., my employer. I would be happy to do whatever is the best fit for this situation. Thank you. LYLAWDubai (talk) 10:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LYLAWDubai. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LYLAWDubai. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LYLAWDubai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am confused whether this is classified as a paid activity or whether I should disclose my COI for the reason that the subject is the founder of the firm I work at, i.e., my employer. I would be happy to do whatever is the best fit for this situation. Thank you. LYLAWDubai (talk) 10:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As you're employed by the subject you're editing on, that comes automatically under our paid-editing-rules. Paid editing is also a COI, but it is a specific kind of COI and must be disclosed specifically. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your guidance. I have declared the necessary on my User Page, please let me know if it is up to standards. Upon receiving acceptance of my new username, I shall update it. Thanks again! LYLAWDubai (talk) 11:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that seems to be in order. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludmila Yamalova (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QuicoleJR were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludmila Yamalova and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QuicoleJR (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ludmila Yamalova has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ludmila Yamalova. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]