User talk:LILVOKA/Archive1

Archives

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LILVOKA

Hi.

When you post a pic to illustrate an article, you have to make sure that it's fairuse (meaning not copyrighted). Also, pictures for artisles with only one picture should go on the top right, so that the article text flows to the top. See Wikipedia:Picture tutorial and Wikipedia:Image use policy for more info.

Also, be sure to site sources and tag the image with an appropriate image tag. Thanks! --b. Touch 02:02, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please, read this before you upload

Wikipedia:Image use policy. -- user:zanimum

Image:Young Buck.JPG

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Young Buck.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

LaToyia Figueroa

IMO it is a obvious ommission on Wikipedia to have articles on each of the white girls listed as examples in Missing white woman syndrome but no article on the counter example. It looks like we Wikipedians are just as guilty as the news media for ignoring minority crime. From your edits to Missing white woman syndrome, you clearly have knowledge of and interest in the LaToyia Figueroa case. How about writing the article for LaToyia Figueroa yourself? --Tysto 19:43, 2005 August 1 (UTC)

Nice job on the article. I gave it a light edit. --Tysto 23:32, 2005 August 12 (UTC)

err...

Not to be an asshole (I appreciate a lot of the work you do, on G-Unit, for example, and your user page), but the proper acronym for Some Ironic American Dialogue is SIAD, not SAID... jglc | t | c 17:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Word, man. Lemme know when the article's done - I'm interested in hearing more about it. jglc | t | c 05:11, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What are they trying to do?

These other users are trying to delete things that will be part of history. Just because they dont like it spicifically Paul Klenk's doesn't mean nobody else would.Imdaking 19:53:51, 2005-08-28 (UTC)

Explanation requested

I'm not sure I understand what you were getting at with your comment on my talk page. Would you please clarify it for me? Thanks. Paul Klenk 00:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see the VMA'S

I never thought fat joe was going to come out with something, "I never felt so protected... security courtesy of G-Unit." that was funny, right after 50 performed, he called fat joe a pussy boy and almost seem like he wanted to cry. this is turning out to be some crazy sh*t.

Imdaking 04:02:27, 2005-08-29 (UTC

As to: Quit making this mess! You can't use f-bomb and pussy to describe an article!! Wiki an article to its standards!, Wikipedia is uncensored, and it is bad practice to censor actual quotes simply because they have obscenities. --Fallout boy 04:03, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Disturbing Tha Peace Click.JPG has been listed for deletion

An image you have uploaded, Image:Disturbing Tha Peace Click.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Kanye West.JPG has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Kanye West.JPG , has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Do you know?

I just found out one of wikipedia's users are gay.A lady told User:Paul Klenk that he is gay. Frekin'bastard!. I aint talking to his gay ass anymore, f*ck that sh*t. They should have some policy about gay people, like, an automatic block or banning of the user in the first signs of ~~homosexuality~~. check out his user talk page. It says it all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imdaking (talk • contribs) 22:30, 10 September 2005

This incident and others involving Imdaking have gone far enough. Too far, in fact. Please don't fuel the fire by adding comments like the one you left on Paul Klenk's talk page. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 16:41, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See, now they block me.

I spoke the truth, even User:thedeletator, agreed with me. I may have overreacted but, that wasnt the reason why, they wanted to get rid of me since I started. They teamed up on me, they called me names too, "Jerk", "crackhead" "imdaluser"....what is this? this is insults as well, they are using their administrator powers againts me, for bad... Usigned comment by imdaking

Thank you

I really mean that, too. I was just getting ready to sign off when the message flag popped up. Thanks to this other user's behavior, my wikivacation is a working one. :) Take care, good night and have fun! I'm as close as my talk page. - Lucky 6.9 04:56, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EMINEM edit

Was Eminem number 3 or 6 on VH1's 50 greatest hip hop artists of all time. .::Imdaking::. ^{TLK | Y!}

?? .::Imdaking::. ^{TLK | Y!} 03:08, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Check out G-Unot

I added links The Game's mixtapes, You Know What It is Vol. 3 & Ghost Unit. If You see any mistakes or missing info. please add or edit it. Thanks. --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 23:21, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring O'Reilly

I understand detesting Bill O'Reilly, but you didn't supply any reason for restoring his wiki entry back to it's previous, ridiculously chaotic state.

If you feel the new version isn't as extensive regarding his lying, remember: this is an encylopedia, not a blog; it shouldn't be used to track each and every beef you might have with an individual. MAJOR controversies have their place, but whatever little facts and statistics the man made up that week should be left to Media Matters and other watchdogs.

Now the clean-up it underwent last week was major, but it purged almost all of the non-encyclopedic content. If you feel something vital is now missing, by all means make the necessary additions. But the condition it was in before was just silly, so missing content needs to be rewritten.

Again, please don't vent your frustrations with a subject via wikipedia. The articles are for general overviews and major news items.

- Plastic Editor

Taylor Behl Info

Thanks for your note. Having helped to write the Article on Wikipedia:Recentism I think it would be hypocritical of me to write this article, but here are some resources to enable you to do it:

I would recommend you don't come down too hard on the 38 year old person of interest as he has not even been charged yet. MPS 14:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IMPORTANT!!!

Hey lil, do you think big fase 100 actually wrote this?Game(rapper) --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 04:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:When They Were Cool.JPG

Hello. I was wondering if you have a source for the above image. If not, it will have to be deleted and removed from all articles. Zach (Sound Off) 05:09, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Sheehan

Is there some particular reason why you accused me of vandalizing the Cindy Sheehan article? Or is it just that you see any addition to the "Generally opposed" list of websites in her article as "vandalism"? Hiddekel 21:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Rumor Mill

It would be good if they do wave it out, but I dont think it will be easy, after all these disses, they might wave it out but it dont mean they'll work together --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 18:16, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RECOP the DOC

I've already received my signed CD and a copy of Ghost Unit by the game. I send it the first of the month and it just got here, he must of gotten alot of cds from fans to sign... --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 00:17, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Accept this Benjamin...

For the contrutions to great articles, I I'mdaking, give you this "Ben". Spend it wisely!

hey...

you think this would scare the Cråp out of annoymous vandals?

'King's Vadal Warning --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 03:21, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No...

I was showing you the template I made for annonymous vandals...

50 shooting

Hey- why do you keep on blanking the "May 2000 shooting" section at 50 Cent? Is there something the rest of us should know? Are there errors in it? Staecker 01:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals

In all honesty, I maintain a "zero politics" policy while I'm here at Wikipedia (and make sure that nobody knows my politics in real life). I try to understand that all people have their political positions, but that never gives them the right to vandalize our hard work. For example, if you take a look at the block log, you'll notice that I blocked two users in a row: one for defacing George W Bush, another for Bill Clinton. :) – ClockworkSoul 17:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Along the vandalism line...per your message, if you want to revert to LifeStar you can if you know what "cap-and-trade programs" are vs. "emissions trading". That's the only edit he made and I only have a vague idea of what that is. Thx for the message and good work. --DanielCD 19:49, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Pastor Troy.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Pastor Troy.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Pak21 15:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note; what do you think the status of Image:Pastor Troy.JPG is? If you can claim fair use for it, you need to tag it appropriately. If it's not, you should probably tag it as a CSD so it can be removed. (If you don't do anything, it will become a CSD on 7 December and be deleted very soon after that). Cheers --Pak21 09:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I note you've now tagged the image as {{fairuse}}, but you haven't provided a rationale for its use (as requested by the template); without this, it's still liable to be deleted. See Fair use rationale for more details. Cheers! --Pak21 11:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please see the valid information on the three revert rule. You reverted The Game (rapper) four times in 59 minutes, none of which for "simple vandalism." Instead of lame edit wars, why not explain your rationale in the relevant talk page? that way, a compromise could be worked out. jfg284 ^{you were saying?} 17:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

...I don't understand. It seems you have a problem with mostwanted05 (and that could be due to his edits on the other pages mentioned in your recent talk post), but I still have trouble understanding what it is that's a problem about stop snitchin' stop lyin'. its a new dvd by the game, and from what ive read its MORE than just a shot at 50 cent / g unit / whoever else, its also just a dvd. there should be a small entry on it in the article. Also, you brought it to the talk page, two users said the supported its inclusion and one user (you) said they did not. then you took it out again. that's hardly a consensus. Now, honestly, i dont have any personal attachment to the article. im not a fan of rap, my interest extends to a select few artists like common and the roots, and i think i stumbled into the game article through a vandalism i caught on recent changes, but now i'm wondering what your justification is for doing this. Also, if you can't smooth things over with mostwanted, think about taking it to requests for arbitration.jfg284 ^{you were saying?} 17:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I'm about to file a RFC against Mostwanted05 for use of sockpuppets to promote his POV views anyday now. There should be a sentence on the stop snitching DVD, but that is just a mixtape and it's really no big deal. I agree with you reverting his ways. Thanks --Aranda ⁵⁶ 20:45, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MostWanted05

Reply: MostWanted05 has been banned form editing Wikipedia. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.

The Neokid 17:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MostWanted05 - Different IPs

Reply: You can report the IPs at Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism with your reason. An administrator will then assess the situation and block the IPs. If he/she has a dynamic IP (i.e. one that changes regularly) they you just have to report them each time. An example of an offender with multiple IPs and user accounts is Willy on wheels, who is notorious for his sock-puppets.

50 Cent article

I turned the 50 Cent (rapper) article into a redirect back to the regular 50 Cent article as it's only a copy from that. It's better off creating a 50 Cent disambiguation page instead. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:43, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

If you want to request a page to be protected, you need to go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection (WP:RFP). Putting the template on a page doesn't actually cause the protection, that's just a notice to let people know AFTER its protection. I'm not sure if the vandalism is bad enough to warrant a protection. It's not actually vandalism, it's more of a difference in opinion. I hope my information on protection was enlightening - Stoph 00:21, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Lil' Flip.JPG

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lil' Flip.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J. Nguyen 04:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 13% for major edits and 11% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 79 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup-list

Why did you use {{cleanup-list}} on The Game (rapper) rather than {{cleanup-date}} or one of the other cleanup templates? The Game isn't a list. Just in case you didn't realize. :) --Optichan 21:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

Please do not create redirects like Closet conservatives. -- user:zanimum

40 Glocc et al

Hi LILVOKA. Please note that I have created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/40 Glocc and listed it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 March 1 for consideration. To nominate additional articles for deletion, please use the afd template as so: {{subst:afd}}, follow the red link to create the nomination page, and then list it on the appropriate day at WP:AFD. For more details, you may also consult Wikipedia:Guide to deletion or feel free to contact me on my talk page or by email. Best regards, Hall Monitor 17:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. After a bit of research, it appears that 40 Glocc should be notable enough for inclusion as per established WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC guidelines. Do you still wish to nominate this for deletion? Best regards, Hall Monitor 19:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N'vyus (2nd nomination)

Please revisit this AfD regarding additional nominations for deletion. Thank you. -- Krash (Talk) 13:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:LUDACRIS.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LUDACRIS.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 07:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You never answered my question (The Game article)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Game_%28rapper%29#Children.2FFamily

Still waiting.

This was my question. Sorry for not signing my comments, that might be what led to your confusion. P.S. Didn't you say you were retiring from wikipedia? Ted87 19:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject hiphop announcement

	The current Hip hop collaboration is Get Low (Lil Jon & the East Side Boyz song).
	Please help improve this article ultimately to featured status. You can borrow ideas or comment on the article itself on its peer review.

--Chubdub 15:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question.

I noticed your response to the "rumors." Why do you still have The Game on your list of G-Unit artists? Also, about M.O.P., Spider Loc, and Ma$e, the section is "G-Unit artists," not "Interscope artists." And Keyshia Cole, we don't know about yet. She said she's still with A&M/Interscope, but has not ruled out signing with G-Unit if Fiddy offers enough cash. And about Remy, she might or might not sign, I have no idea. These are a few things to think about. Thanks (sorry I was so harsh on the G-Unit Records talk page) M. Burmy

get in contact

holla at me on aim: YungMike513 YungMike513 20:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

64.9.51.66 report on WP:RFI

Not sure there is anything more that needs 'taking care of' as you've already reverted the vandalism, and as it was a few days ago a block on the IP wouldn't have any effect. I'll add your page to my watchlist, but if I'm not around and you need an admin to block a user (after they have been warned) see WP:AIV. Cheers, Petros471 17:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BWS/G-Unit

It's complicated with BWS, but here is as much as anyone knows.

Nu Jerzey Devil
Charlie Baltimore
Ya Boy
DJ Skee

As for the rest of them

Cyssero- Techincally I'm pretty sure he was never officaly signed, but he did agree in principal to work with BWS. Still a big question mark, but he said he was still cool with Game.
Techinic- Left
Eastwood- Left
Young Life- Left Big Fase's label and is hanging around with Game. Nothing is offical though.

G-Unit- 50, Banks, Bucks, Yayo, Olivia, Mobb Deep, M.O.P., Ma$e, Spider Loc. Lil' Jon's label as a joint venture with G-Unit records (hence Lil' Scrappy's name on the G-Unit Records article).

Hope that helped. Peace.

--Ted87 17:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The golden age of hip hop for deletion?

I see that The golden age of hip hop is up for deletion. I wonder what you think of this.

re: The Game

You can file a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --FuriousFreddy 03:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Most Wanted 05 or known as a multiple account user

Sounds like you may be looking for requests for comment on the user's conduct, as the first step towards dispute resolution. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 05:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Hi! Just to let you know, the "wikihalo" was bogus, passed out by a vandal who did nothing other than pass out "awards" at random. Since, though, such awards are passed out for real for good work, I'll say, keep up the good work! :) Radio Kirk talk to me 04:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Have you dealt with MostWanted05 or the 86.xxxx user?

Your Post: I have no choice, I will report this person to the Wikipedia commitee. He choose to continue the "think I own this site" excuse "over-and-over" again! Wikipedia:Requests for comment/user:MostWanted05 Any thoughts? Thanks. LILVOKA. 31 May 2006 04:33 (UTC)

My Response: I seem to vaguely remember this user, but not enough to be able to comment on him. Wish I would be of more help. --Alan 04:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem ;) (it really needed to be said). --Ted87 22:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:THEGAME.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:THEGAME.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

50 Cent

Why are you deleting infomation from it? It's not like its false or anything. Give us somelinks that disprove it or it will be vandalism by deleting partgs of the article.

Edit Summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Night Gyr 16:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Is This a better version of this article for The Black Wall Street?

That is a lot better. But MostWanted will probably change it. But since they don't have a distribution deal, technically aren't they an idenpendent label? --Ted87 16:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for commenting on the Tamika Huston article. This story really touched me!

WP:AN comment on user MostWanted05

I removed this request from the Admin noticeboard. After reviewing the contributors edits around the time you posted this I don't see the pattern of vandalism that you seem to be implying. For vandalism in progress, I'd suggest adding warnings and a note here Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism if vandalism progresses beyond the 'final warning'. Antonrojo 01:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users

Hi Lilvoka! I appreciate your work in keeping articles free from spam. However, I noticed that you left a warning to another user with my name on it (here: [1]). If this was a simple mistake please disregard the rest of this message. Otherwise, if you'd like to leave a warning message to a user, you should sign it with your own name. For example, if you wanted to leave a similar message as the one you copied, type the following on the user's talk page:

{{subst:spam-n|The Game (rapper)}} ~~~~

A listing of all the available warning messages can be found here: Template:TestTemplates.

Let me know if you have any questions or need any help! --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 02:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political views in 50 Cent article + editsummaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Hi, I've readded the political views section to 50 Cent for reasons I've listed on the articles talk page. I'm not sure what your objection to this is but I see it as pertinant as those in the Madonna (entertainer) article - Peripitus (Talk) 06:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check links before removing them

You are one of few members who continue to remove useful links from pages such as the Aftermath Entertainment page. Please check the links before reverting changes as these are links added due to being of great benefit to visitors who are looking for more relation information and media.

Thank you, Tony

Arbitration

I have not looked enough to know if you should file an arbitration case, but if you do, file it at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. Fred Bauder 04:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:50 Cent.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:50 Cent.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 16:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Benzino.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Benzino.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 12:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

I noticed that you tagged the page User talk:MostWanted05 for speedy deletion with the reason "User talk is being deleted also due to the behavior of MostWanted05. Earlier nomination. Posted by LILVOKA". However, "User talk is being deleted also due to the behavior of MostWanted05. Earlier nomination. Posted by LILVOKA" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:MFD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 21:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:G-Unit.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:G-Unit.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 23:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What would be the best image tag for

File:G-Unit.JPG

Is there any appropriate tag for the image I uploaded back in October. It is an established image for many other websites and I had obtained it from G-UnitWorld (website). If there's anything else I could do for this image? Thanks. LILVOKA 22:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't tell you the best tag without knowing the real source and copyright holder for the image. --Carnildo 18:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 50 Cent/politics article

You keep on saying that I'm using weasel words yet you never articulate what those words are. You also keep giving me crap about presenting sources yet I provide 3 credible and independent links to back the text. Thirdly, there is a immense precedent for citing the political views of non-politicians and even musicians/rappers. I placed it in the "controversy" section because it is obviously controversial. Your argument just doesn't hold water. As I've said before...the only reason that you keep deleting it is because you hate Bush and you CHOOSE to be denial about 50 Cent's comments. --Rambone (Talk) 18:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple of very small fixes to your revision. It's nothing big---just touching up the grammar a bit. I didn't add bias to it or anything like that. I just thought I'd let you know. --Rambone (Talk) 23:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that we could finally come to a concensus on this. --Rambone (Talk) 03:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination as an Administator

Thanks a lot for the consideration. I was thinking that it would be a better idea to do this later on this month, so I can add more edits, study more on how to become/what it takes to be an Admin, etc. Thanks again. --Ted87 23:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

50 Cent

How does referring to 50 Cent simply as "50" constitute acting like a fansite? When writing a bio it's tiresome and unnecessary to repeatedly write a person's full name throughout their bio. Therefore, it's proper to just use their last name. You can see this in every properly written bio on this site and anywhere. But in the case of 50 Cent, you can't just refer to him as "Cent". But he is referred throughout legitimate press as "50" for the same reasons. Because it's cumbersome not only to write but to read "50 Cent, 50 Cent, 50 Cent, 50 Cent...". I think referring to him as 50 is proper in his case. - MrBlondNYC 10:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make or see the corrections made saying "50 said..." But I agree "Jackson" should be used instead. Thanks. -MrBlondNYC 22:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G-Unit Records

Hey look, except for the new artists, I made numerous legitimate corrections to the article that you reverted, including proper spelling, sentence structure and glaring inaccuracies. Please read the whole article and I think you'll agree that everything I wrote was based on fact. Also, forgetting the other artists, my links for 40 Glocc were links to legitmate articles and not his MySpace page. - MrBlondNYC 22:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The rumors are spinning..."

All we can go by now are the artist pictured on the official website for G-Unit Records [2]. MOP, Spider Loc and Ma$e are pictured there. Ma$e is a free agent and will release one scheduled album with G-Unit and there is a link to his site on that site. Since the page is about G-Unit Records, not Interscope, I think the label's official site is a good source of determining who are the artist's on the label. How about you? MrBlondNYC 08:10, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your Lieberman/Lamont post

Your questions are all over the place so I'll just give you my over-arching opinion about the whole thing... My opinion is that Lieberman will win the general election as an independent. I don't agree with him 90% of the time but I like him because he's a honest politician. (one of the few in America) As for Lamont, I see him as Howard Dean II. Sure, the left-wing loves him but when it gets closer to the election, centrist democrats and independents will vote for someone else. I have no idea what CNN will do though I have a strong feeling that they would LIKE to support Lamont. Personally, I can't stand anti-war candidates in this era because most of them don't want to use the military AT ALL. That being said, I'm not blindly pro-war, either. I want to use force when it's neccessary. I supported the reasons for the war in Iraq (and still do) but I'm totally pissed off about how Bush has waged the war. It's as if Bush wants to lose or pass the problem to the next president. Rambone (Talk) 02:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dayton Mall

Why did you change it?

Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music

Whats up? Hi, I'm trying to gather some more interest and support for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music. Please check out the topics and lets get our WikiProject to function better. Recently, I've taken an interest in the Wikipedia:WikiProject hip hop and I consider that WikiProject to be better developed. I am now writing to usernames on the hiphopWP who might be interested in helping with the punkmusicWP. Hopefully we can all work together to improve articles relating to punk as has been done well with hip hop. Finally, I am trying to gather support and opinions concerning the punk house article and specifically the Theta Beta Potata article which is currently in AfD (x2) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theta Beta Potata (second nomination). Please check it out and voice your opinion. Xsxex 09:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing White Woman Syndrome

Please do not remove the Original Research tag without discussion on the talk page. Although the article cites many sources, it does not appear to be derived directly from them. At the least, parts of it need to be rewritten. Joseph N Hall 03:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Date

October 38 was a typo. It suppose to be the 28. If you want to remove the date compeltly then so be it, but I think the year of the incident should be kept. But that's just me. --Ted87 02:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...

That was a serious question. I do expect an answer. Lmz00 00:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:The Game and 50 Cent truce.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:The Game and 50 Cent truce.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 02:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dayton Mall article:

Hello,

I go by the name of MidCenturyMod. I have been the one posting the "alternate" Dayton Mall article, here on Wikipedia. I regret that this has become something of a tug-of-war, of sorts, with my article replacing yours, yours then replacing mine.....I am hoping that we can come to some sort compromise here.

If this were an aricle that I had written about ything else, I oubt t

Edit disputes

To this point, it doesn't appear that things have escalated. You've kept a cool head. For edit war issues, take a look at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.

I've left some specific warning messages and reverted some edits. I see no grounds for any additional actions. I will assume good faith on his part.

When a specific incident requiring administrator review (see page for what is applicable) arises, for quick attention, consider using the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

— ERcheck (talk) 00:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I highly suggest you read the comment I left on ERcheck's talk page. Lmz00 00:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was the version me and Lmz00 created an edit war on

You wrote:

This was the version I worked on September 21, 2006. No vandalism, no weasel words, sourcing, and no copyright violations. This edit war with Lmz00 has gotten to a point where I refuse to answer to the user. The user cannont resolve this dispute without using inactive comments toward myself and others. It's just simplified just to compromise a fair look at the article without using too many links and notable likeness. And for the user to use 50 instead of 50 Cent, that just another way of saying a number said this instead of a rapper. Just look at the current version. The last time I edit this article was about at least a week ago. I asked for a protection to inactive users who choose not to compromise, and refuse to work as a community. I hope this version (I left above in the link) is used on this article.

This is the current version that User Lmz00 left after I ceased the edit war. And yes, this is what is on the article (and you can decide)!

Multiple use of name of Sean Combs. Here the list of words, Diddy, Puffy, P. Diddy, Combs, Sean "Puffy Combs is located throughout the whole article. All I suggested was to used was mogul or rapper, to cease the constant use of the person's name. (Inproper use of proper names)!

Mase still claimed the status of a pastor. The album contained no curse words and was not derogatory in any way towards females. (Weasel words)!

'50 was in talks with Diddy to buy Mase from Bad Boy in order to sign him to G-Unit. However, those talks fell through, prompting 50 to make a diss record towards Diddy titled "The Bomb" (which accuses him of stalling said negotiations). In addition, 50 also mentions no longer wanting to make a deal. (Inproper wording of proper names, weasel words, and not neutral in explaining feud with rappers)!

Mase's desire to leave Bad Boy is primarily due to his third album not selling so well. (This is an example of weasel words)!

This has been discredited however, by the wider hip-hop community. Mase has also been called a hypocrite by former G-Unit member, The Game, who called out the pastor (as well as other G-Unit members) on his anti-G-Unit DVD, Stop Snitchin', Stop Lyin'. (Another example of weasel words)!

Ok that it. Thanks. LILVOKA 15:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you'll look at the changes i made, you may well perceive that i have no interest in the topic of the Ma$e bio: i was there to fix the effect of the misunderstanding of how the piping of Cats works when the name is odd typographically. I'm sure the conflict you are involved in will come to some sort of reasonable conclusion without my intervention. I involve myself in dispute resolution but rarely, and only when i have some more substantial interest in and understanding of the matter involved. You would do better to enlist those who describe themselves as mediators, arbitrators, or other specific roles in the dispute-resolution process. Thanks for your interest in WP.
--Jerzy•t 16:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]