User talk:Kurykh/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with Kurykh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| < Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 > |
| All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - ... (up to 100) |
WikiProject Aviation Newsletter delivery
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Your accusations
Did I somehow manage to tangle with someone in your clique? If so, please accept my DEEPEST apologies. I simply can't think of any other reason you could come to the conclusions you did about the thread I posted in the RfA discussion page. One way or the other though, you're simply wrong. Please point directly to ANYTHING in my message that would be considered "trolling", and also to where posting my reasoning to a closed RfA's DISCUSSION page is against ANY Wiki policy. In the absence of your doing so, I'll ask that you withdraw your accusations in bad faith that I was trolling or that I was in any way "hounding" someone. My thread was direct, honest, and most definitely NOT a personal atttack in any way. (It's also interesting when you happened to choose to archive.)K. Scott Bailey 00:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- With respect, Physicq210, and considering your concern at unwarranted and unneeded comments about Chacor, this is a little over the top. Expressing one's permanent distrust of another editor, especially in the controversial circumstances of the RfA, is nothing like "akin to defiling someone's grave". Really, in no way whatsoever. Adminship is "no big deal" and therefore failing an RfA is not a terminal condition.
- Yes, the comments were probably best removed and no, they shouldn't be re-instated. But throwing such innapropriate analogies around is unhelful at best and inflammatory baiting at worse. Please lets be try to resolve this incident rather than reignite it. Rockpocket 01:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. Being prone to hyperbole myself, I know what its like to occasionally overstate your case in the heat of the moment. I always appreciate being asked to reconsider them, so I thought I would pass it on. Best wishes, Rockpocket 02:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Some help? (Part deux)
I don't know if you missed my follow up at User talk:Physicq210/Archive 4#Some help, but the user has uploaded the same pictures again (Image:Pagemcconnell199.jpg & Image:Jonfishman18.jpg) and is claiming to be Frank Stevens, the original photographer of these photos when at http://www.musicgods.com/momentends/ it states " All photographs and contents of this site are © 2000 John Davis. All Rights Reserved." The user brings up the copyright notice, though, which seems to contradict itself at http://www.musicgods.com/momentends/copyright.html since it says both:
- "The Moment Ends Photography encourages artists to use the images for non-commercial and non-profit projects, especially CD-R cover artwork."
&
- "Any other reproduction or manipulation of these images without the permission of The Moment Ends Photography is a violation of copyright. No images are within Public Domain."
Please, any help would be appreciated or telling me who else can help me. Thanks! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
User page in Category:Archival templates
Ok, I took a look and cannot quite figure out how your user page ended up being listed in Category:Archival templates. I didn't want to mess anything up, but want to let you know. — MrDolomite • Talk 10:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:How?
I think AAA! (talk · contribs) is most likely a confused username because the letters and /!/ makeit look like it a "screaming username". Plus, he or she moved from "User talk:AAA!" to AAAA AAAA: AAA! (which is the one I'm puzzled with that). Groupempty (talk • contribs) 04:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Blocking Hamsacharya_duh (talk · contribs)
Hi, I noticed you blocked this person as well as several of his sockpuppets. I was wondering if you can help me figure out how to find the citations for what resulted in his block? He has a new sockpuppet who is evading the block: [1]. Thanks --Hamsacharya dan 16:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Your comment at RfAr Free Republic
I am sorry that I missed your comment several days ago at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Proposed decision#Reversion by Newyorkbrad. I have belatedly noticed it now and responded there. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Block
Nice block on that username. Crested Penguin 01:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
JustaHulk
Thanks for the unblock of JustaHulk; I added an unambiguous note to the User page identifying it as my alternate account. --Justanother 21:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hello Physicq210 I want to first assure you that I'm not appealing your decision or looking to have the account in question moved. I am interested in how Wikipedia handles unusual issues and this is one. It was my understanding that usernames are not supposed to contain anything which may be seen as an indirect violation of WP:NPA without speaking to everyone involved. In the interest of saving space I'll briefly summarize, JustaHulk.
- 04 March, I tried to resolve a difference of opinion re: WP:BLP with Justanother on his talk page and got this reply,
This is a link to the archived discussion, if you have time I encourage you to read it.Hi. First, please let me know your religion or other spiritual beliefs (or lack of), your race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. so that I can cast aspersions on them (and you) for your misapplying the self-same policy, in addition to your fear of being caught WP:CANVASSING, and any other errors that I happen to catch you in. Talk about offensive! And all with the "goody two-shoes, I'm so pure and holier-than-thou" attitude. Makes me gag. I sure as hell could give a shit if you think I work for OSA. Or if you think I am one rude motherfucker. --Justanother 16:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- The next day I tried to explain to him that he has an extremely volatile temper which makes him difficult to deal with (he had stated that I was inconsistent in the way I treated him). This quote from the Justahulk page shows what I said:
From my archive - "You appear to experience some kind of Incredible Hulk persona when you really start to melt down (I was gonna say Jekyl/Hyde but the Hulk sounds less like an insult considering many consider him to be a superhero whereas the former is considered a monster)." --Anynobody 10:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- 04 March, I tried to resolve a difference of opinion re: WP:BLP with Justanother on his talk page and got this reply,
- I am concerned that I wasn't asked if the account name offended me because even though this doesn't offend me, I think there are many editors who would consider it a constant WP:PA. Again, in this case I am not offended. Frankly it does more to make him look deceitful and spiteful than I could ever describe for a WP:RfC on his editing style I am working on with several editors. I say deceitful because he misrepresented the origin of the name with at least one other admin: Jersey Devil by saying he created the Justahulk account to mess with someone else. User_talk:Jersey_Devil#JustaHulk
- Please respond here, I'm not looking to start a conflict over this with him. (I'm also not trying to give you a headache, I'm just curious) Thank you for your time, Anynobody 10:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:UW future?
Hi Physicq210,
Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace templates. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khukri 10:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Ohlone
Hi Physicq210...you were kind enough to review the Ohlone page and left a comment "SFBAProject B class; looks like extremely close to GA class, might be worth a try)". Please tell me if there is some area in particular you recommend improvement, if any, before we try for GA class? Goldenrowley 01:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Chris Lawson
I didn't mean to be uncivil. It's just he is being so unreasonable and "shouting" at me, etc. Please do not let him become an administrator...PLEASE!!!! For all our sakes, for history's sake! JohnHistory 04:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)JohnHistory
Are you threatening me? I am trying to be civil. I will try "extra" hard. I hope you have told Chris Lawson this too, as he is the one pushing the envelope, I am being modestly reactionary. Agian, I will be extra civil. But I hope your not setting a double standard here??? JohnHistory 04:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)JohnHistory
If you read that discussion thread, and the previous one on the same subject with two-three other users who opposed him, and looked at his source and it's quote, then how can you not vote agianst him for becoming a moderator???? JohnHistory 04:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)JohnHistory
OK, Just I thought I would appeal to your "desire for truth and integrity". JohnHistory 04:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)JohnHistory
Is it better now? JohnHistory 04:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)JohnHistory
Hi Physicq210, as I noted on the IP talk page that you declined the unblock, I'm the one who made the mistake of reverting the IP's edits on it's talk page for just removing warnings.(I thought that removal of warnings was considered vandalism, but it's only often frowned upon, which puts me at fault for whatever vandalism on the talk page. Please forgive me. I've apologized to the IP, and notified another user aswell.) I know that I still can't expect you to change your decline even at this point, but I wanted you to know that it wasn't entirely the fault of the IP.--Wikipedier (talk • contribs) 01:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
List of banned users
As I said at WP:CN#Community ban library: Please feel free (and welcome!) to add your efforts to Wikipedia:List of banned users. I've been finding and listing banned users who weren't already on the page, with links to Arbcom decisions or other discussions, Wikipedia:Long term abuse sections and subpages, etc. Just today I finished going through the five archive pages of the relatively new Community [sanction] noticeboard. Still ahead: the hundreds of archive pages for WP:AN and WP:AN/I. Oh boy, would some help be nice!
By the way, I've updated the {{vandal-s}} template (used to list these entries) with a span-id that makes each username its own anchor, so anyone can cite individual entries like WP:BANNED#AWilliamson or WP:BANNED#Verdict. The same feature is in {{usercheck}}, which I recommend for ban proposals, so even if the section header omits the username, noticeboardname#username will find the entry, e.g. WP:CN#Roitr while that entry's still on the page, -- Ben TALK/HIST 05:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
USRD Newsletter - Issue 4
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Feedback on SSP
Hello there. I would love to get you or any other admin's feedback on the following report. Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jonawiki Things are beginning to get uncivil and I'm trying hard not to cross that line, but I have to admit, it's getting rather difficult. If you have any free time and can offer some help or feedback, it would be much appreciated. Thanks. Roguegeek (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Turok
Hi there. I'm changing the Turok 1 sock list to Turok 19. They got started at the same time and are being consolidated. All new socks are being tagged with Turok 19. Regards, Flyguy649talkcontribs 05:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're right; Turok 1 came first. But they're all being tagged 19 now. I think one list is more useful... Thoughts? Flyguy649talkcontribs 05:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. Turok 1 it is. I'll let Persian Poet Gal know. Just sucks that we were working against each other on this ! Flyguy649talkcontribs 05:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Turok 1. Turok 1. I need coffee. Turok 1. Cheers! Flyguy649talkcontribs 05:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
tedious
I made the report at WP:AIV but it's not moving over there.
- 12.219.252.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
What say you go ahead and block and save us the frustration? =) — coelacan — 05:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Very much appreciated. — coelacan — 05:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I didn't know that banning was for long-term abuse, not for shorter abuses, no matter how severe. I made the report, because of the severity of the case, but now I know that ignoring those short abuses is the best way to handle it.--Wikipedier (talk • contribs) 07:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS | |
| Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup | WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" |
| News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
This article's editors have made considerable progress toward achieving consensus, and one of them has requested I unprotect it. Since I've made clear my opinion on the matter, and since an opposing editor has taken a short break, I don't think it's appropriate for me to remove the protection you have given the article. Although I don't particularly agree with the consensus, I have no intention of manifesting my opinion anywhere but on the article's talk page. I realize it's a lot to plow through, but when you have time, would you review the article's talk page and consider removing the block yourself? Rklawton 19:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Edited WP:BANNED#A
Sorry, I'd been editing Community bans #A, and when the screen came back, it had your "don't edit" at the top. That hadn't been there on the revision I was looking at. Feel free to revert or edit over my change, I can redo it later. Again, sorry! -- Ben TALK/HIST 03:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:BANNED, ArbCom section revamp
Okay, I like that it's giving more information, particularly duration and (where extended) actual end date, and the division between definite and indefinite durations. Looks good.
Quibble #1: I'd prefer just the vandal-s template and date info be bolded in first line. Case name etc can be normal font (below or beside), as with Jimbo's and community bans.
Quibble #2: Entry for -Ril- should be normal rather than bold; as the top says, socks are normal font, only main username is bolded.
But those are quibbles. You've done a very nice job! -- Ben TALK/HIST 04:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well, we can tidy up here and there, nip and tuck, y'know. May I take a turn? BTW, I think Lir was banned in 2004 rather than 2007, or am I reading the ArbCom case wrong? -- Ben TALK/HIST 04:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tell ya what, since you're doing the heavy lifting, while I'm getting to sit back and kibitz ("Hey, move it two feet to the left! Now move it three feet to the right!"), you just take your own time about it! I'm going to take a well-deserved nap, and see what's there when I wake up.
- Two more quibbles or suggestions, whatever. Section titles: "Indefinite-duration bans" and "Definite-duration bans", for more parallel construction. ArbCom case names: use short linklabels, like "RfArb:Lir", or "LTA:Hrelkar"; anyone confused by those can still see the full name by hovering over or clicking the links. If you like those ideas, use 'em; if not, don't. Have fun! ... And a big THANK YOU for joining in this cleanup! -- Ben TALK/HIST 04:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
If you are going to clean up User:DeanHinnen's page, you might as well treat User:Fairness And Accuracy For All the same. I don't really care which format you prefer but it seems rather unequitable to clean off one page with a large "Banned" banner while not doing the same to the other since they were banned in the same ArbCom decision. --Tbeatty 23:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you read the ArbCom remedies, you'll see that the two users were treated very differently (specifically, FaaFA was banned for a year, versus Dean's community ban which has no end date. Very different punishments, hence very different treatment. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Arbcom
It would have been funnier if you speedied it. :). --Tbeatty 05:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Physicq 210
What does Physicq stand for? King Lopez Contribs 07:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for unblocking me, and replying to my question. --Jimbo Herndan 18:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
You just beat me to him. Further to your comment on his talk page, his edits are mainly, although not totally vandalisms. Which I guess we might have expected?--Anthony.bradbury 20:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello Doctor !
I was a bit brisk in my comment on User talk:Ponyboy. I found his reply opening my User talk:Lunarian(comment at the top of the page). I had a good laugh ! I hope you do not mind ! Thanks for your good intentions. (do not bother to much about it, I'm not in for edit war)
- See you around the bend.
- (Lunarian 12:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC))
Checkuser case closed
Hi, your request for checkuser was completed. You can find it in the archives for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/IP_check/Archive#Ararat_arev. -- lucasbfr talk 22:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named
Sound advice, thanks for the slap. John Reaves (talk) 03:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable" | Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention |
| Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion | Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction |
| WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane" | News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll |
| Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
| Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
That talk page protection
...sorry, ANI next time then. It seemed fairly trivial so I didn't know if it warranted a whole thing there. sorry! - Denny 06:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Shenme like picture
Thank you for both graphs at Ban trend. The second one really helps to qualify the concern. Perhaps another just like it after a couple more months, to compare curve slopes? Of course, it may still end up reflecting the increased awareness of the procedure, rather than increased readiness to use it - wait, that sounds like a stupid statement. Duh, that why me like pictures! :-) Shenme 23:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
green light
Whoooa we're like on the same wavelength. 490nm, to be exact. — coelacan — 04:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Young man, I appreciate that you removed a vandalistic editing from my my user-page.--Anglius 00:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Gassho
Kind of you to remove garbage from my discussion page. Good luck on your exams - or should I say "Enjoy your exams!" If you prepare like a demon and then treat them like play you are likely to do very well. Haiduc 03:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
San Francisco nicknames
I am from San Francisco therefore I know the most commonly used nicknames, however when I add the nicknames used daily they keep being erased which is very irritating. If Wikipedia is an encyclopedia should it not use the correct information so that when others read it they know more about it? Again I have lived here my whole life so I know the names used, whether I like them or not they are the nicknames used; these are "Frisco", "The Sco", "Sucka Free City", "The City", "City By The Bay". However, "Fog City" is not a commonly used term for San Francisco; in fact I have not heard that ever before. Also, what gives you a say in what the nicknames are for San Francisco? Do you or have you ever lived or even been there? Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tsparxxx (talk • contribs) 19:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC).
San Francisco nicknames
I am very surprised that living in the city in all your time there you have not heard the most commonly used of them all, Frisco. Also, Sucka Free City, which is a very common term and was the name of a movie made by Spike Lee about San Francisco. The Sco is a term used more by residents of the city, not so well known by others. However you can search any one of these terms on any search engine and find a result and if you're still questionning them add myspace at the end of any of your searches for these names and you will find residents and musicians who were born and raised in the city with these names on their page. Feel free to add whatever nicknames you want to the San Francisco page but do not remove others without a better reason than not previously hearing those names yourself. ,Thank You —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tsparxxx (talk • contribs) 19:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC).
SF
Wow this is so petty, ad nauseum, ad infinitum, really doesn't matter to me; the point is they are nicknames for the city of San Francisco. Apparently now factual nicknames, when disputed by habitual wikipedia users, are no longer factual; it's a sad thing. Keep whatever nicknames you want for the city you supposedly are from because living and breathing on an online encyclopedia really isn't my thing. Later, have fun on here.
USRD Newsletter - Issue 5
   The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 5 | 5-8 April 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 00:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey Physicq, I was just wondering if it was OK if I wrote a nom for Coelecan? I've been following the user for a while d think s/he's great admin material, would you be OK to do a co-nom? if not, by all means do the nom and I'll co-nom. All that matters is that Coelacan becomes an admin! Let me know either way, cheers Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 02:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I'm online now and ready to fill out the answers to the questions, but aren't the support votes at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Coelacan supposed to be commented out or something, before transclusion? — coelacan — 22:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I just went ahead and removed them; I'll let those voters know after I transclude. — coelacan — 23:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! — coelacan — 00:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanxs.
I was reminded by your wikibreak notice that AP testings are coming up. Thanks for reminding me to set my priorities straight and to start studying! Have fun with the AP tests. =) Jumping cheese Cont@ct 10:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
community sanction board
Thanks for reverting. It was accidental since my internet was very slow, so I kept pressing the the "save page" button, but it's all good. Appreciate it--Certified.Gangsta 06:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Danny Wool regains adminship in controversial RFA | Leak last year likely to produce changes for handling next board election |
| Association of Members' Advocates' deletion debate yields no consensus | WikiWorld comic: "Fake shemp" |
| News and notes: Donation, Version 0.5, milestones | Wikipedia in the news |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
User:Idontluvhimanymore
Hey Physicq, just wondering why you blocked this username? Not berating, just wondering which area of the username policy disallows it. Thanks, – Riana ऋ 02:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- No worries :) I think it's the name of a song, or something. Anyway, take care. – Riana ऋ 03:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Quid Pro Quo
Yes, I apologize for that report. It has been cleared up, and I would have removed it myself, but wanted to wait for official consencus.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Go study!
Thanks for your help on the Istia debacle, but you are posting ***entirely*** too much today if you have upcoming exams. Good luck! Egfrank 09:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Ингар Кнудтсен speedy deletion
HI. I've undeleted Ингар Кнудтсен because IMO it does not fir CSD A2 because I can not find it at any other language wikipedia. I've tagged it {{notenglish}} and listed it at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English. Let's wait and see what comes out of there? - Nabla 01:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)