User talk:Kruzepatrick

I source out factual information that comes from credible sources

Kruzepatrick, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kruzepatrick! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Awesome Kruzepatrick (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kruzepatrick. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

AfC notification: Draft:Rhiannon Dollar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rhiannon Dollar. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok so do I remove the external links and then submit the article i only have sources available from what I’ve seen and what I’m watching her currently work how do we build her portfolio when all of her work is based on instagram there is a grid in her live feed that has all the episodes she has conducted within the past 6 months every statement made about Rhiannon is factual and significant what else can I do to help get her pay submitted if there isn’t any news articles as such on the women’s work Kruzepatrick (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

First, you make a search for WP:Reliable sources which demonstrate your subject's WP:Notability, then you base the entire article on what those reliable sources say. That means no worshipful, flowery exaggeration, no praise. If you want those external links, they have to be converted into WP:Inline citations. And by the way, WP:Your first article is a very important resource: be sure to read it.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rhiannon Dollar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rhiannon Dollar. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rhiannon Dollar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rhiannon Dollar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nsk92 (talk) 06:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

That’s not the case this is a factual page based upon the significance of the proposed entity that being the host for sixsyndicate tv horse racing channel miss Rhiannon dollar Kruzepatrick (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

In addition to having facts, your draft uses inflated language to praise its subject. The trouble is, Wikipedia is not for promotion.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:59, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kruzepatrick! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Submission of a page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)