User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 29
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Krimuk2.0. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Tabloid style
Hi, it is regarding this and similar edits by this user. I find them tabloid-y. Also see this one, a lot has been added lately. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh yea, very much so. I recently undid some of their tabloid-style writing on Emraan Hashmi's page. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Possibly a sock? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Most likely. But at this moment, I'm really not sure of whose. There's way too many possibilities. Sigh! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Possibly a sock? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Another article [1], this looks like a POV from a user mostly working in a particular area (Telugu films). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Another concern in the above edit by that user was arrangement. Isn't the 1976 Tamil movie be mentioned first? This user moved the whole Telugu related section to the top. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| For having become a consistent and helpful contributor to the WP:Top 25 Report. igordebraga ≠ 05:34, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Dual roles
In film cast sections, actors playing multiple roles should not be listed as
- Ranbir Kapoor in a dual role as
- Rannvijay Singh
- Aziz Haque
right? Simply *Actor as character and character is right? But this is a pan-Indian problem that I'm not able to permanently erase, as evident here.
Kailash29792 (talk) 10:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, it's very annoying tbh. Impossible to win against these IPs & socks tho when there is very little admin support. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Silo Title Card.png
Thanks for uploading File:Silo Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Prabhas
Would be nice if you could take a look at this article. Apart from this particular set of edits, I believe the article needs some copyedit/cleanup. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Andrew Garfield reverts
- An editor can remove any message from their talk page. Removal of messages such as this simply mean that the editor has seen and read then. Lard Almighty (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- When I had done this previously I had admins breathing down my neck threatening to ban me for doing the same, unless that was an admin abusing power I'm not sure. But that is what I have known regarding removing messages, especially ones of that height. Spooderman6920 (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- As noted on your talk page, the warning was completely inappropriate. It was perfectly reasonable to remove it. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- When I had done this previously I had admins breathing down my neck threatening to ban me for doing the same, unless that was an admin abusing power I'm not sure. But that is what I have known regarding removing messages, especially ones of that height. Spooderman6920 (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- An editor can remove any message from their talk page. Removal of messages such as this simply mean that the editor has seen and read then. Lard Almighty (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings @Krimuk2.0
Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your user profile (from recent article history Deepika Padukone) .
Requesting your visit to My Choice (2015 film) (still a draft in my userspace) and help expand the topic areas if you find topic interesting. Wish you very happy Wikipedia editing.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 09:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Crew (film)
I had a look at Crew (film) in connection with your request for page protection. If it were semi-protected, it would have prevented the addition of the plot summary, which appears to be a good addition, so I did not protect it. I wondered if the plot summary was a copyvio but Earwig does not flag it up as one. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Cwmhiraeth, the issue is IPs lowering the budget again and again, as well as spamming IMDB links of "casting department" in the production section. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Sunny Deol Signature
Why did you remove it from his page? Parminder Sarwara (talk) 01:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The above article belongs to FA-class hence the "Citation needed" tag that I was compelled to add today would not be a good addition to the page. As a prominent contributor to the article and the individual responsible for its attainment of FA status, I kindly request that you address the issue at your earliest convenience. Additionally, I believe the adjustments I made to the captions are satisfactory. Should you wish to revert them, I suggest we engage in discussion on the talk page beforehand. I eagerly await your response. Regards MSincccc (talk) 11:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- "compelled to add" for what, exactly? Also, please understand that per WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO the article should remain in its stable version until a consensus is reached. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krimuk2.0 Well I was only trying to help. I honestly don't understand why do you want to keep on mentioning "Larson" in the image captions when its clear that we are referring to only her for two reasons:1)The article is her biography and 2) Its an image in which is featured alone. Had it been a group photograph, I would have agreed with you. Regards and good luck with your future endeavours, MSincccc (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Because beginning a caption with "at" reads poorly. I'm not questioning your intentions here, please don't misunderstand. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I also assume good faith. By the way, one user whom I know very well and with whom I have collaborated had nominated Aishwarya Rai Bachchan's article for GA. Nobody has still taken it up for review. I thought that you could help given you are familiar with articles related to the Hindi film industry. I don't know a thing about that being focused on European (mostly British) articles. Regards MSincccc (talk) 12:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I've been one of the most regular contributors on Rai Bachchan's page, and am familiar with Keivan's work on it. But I guess my reviewing it would be a conflict of interest, given my own work on it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krimuk2.0 I know you will not be reviewing the article but would you mind me reviewing it? Regards MSincccc (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Why would I mind? Please go ahead. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- But it’s a pretty long article. I know nothing about Indian films and whoever this person is. Just that Keivan has made major contributions to it recently. Regards MSincccc (talk) 12:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm gonna act like a WikiJaguar and add my own comment. Nobody doubts Krimuk2.0's qualifications to review an article, but given his extensive involvement with the page in question he simply cannot serve as the reviewer. I could not do it either if I were not the nominator. That being said, if this is a topic or person that you're not familiar with, then I would suggest you leave the review to a user who might be more qualified in terms of knowledge about Indian cinema/actors. That way he/she could point out the flaws and issues more easily. I don't know, maybe some uninvolved editor at WP:ICTF could be asked to carry the review. At the end of the day, I just want the review to be fair and transparent so that no one would question the article's status in the future. Keivan.fTalk 01:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say either Shshshsh or FrB.TG would be the best ones to review it, if they have some time. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Very happy to see that someone has finally worked on her article to try to bring it to GA level. I'll see if I can find time to review it. FrB.TG (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- @FrB.TG Apologies for the delayed response. Forgot to subscribe to this section. I'm very glad that you're considering reviewing the article. Hopefully you'll find some time to spare for the review. Keivan.fTalk 05:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Very happy to see that someone has finally worked on her article to try to bring it to GA level. I'll see if I can find time to review it. FrB.TG (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say either Shshshsh or FrB.TG would be the best ones to review it, if they have some time. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm gonna act like a WikiJaguar and add my own comment. Nobody doubts Krimuk2.0's qualifications to review an article, but given his extensive involvement with the page in question he simply cannot serve as the reviewer. I could not do it either if I were not the nominator. That being said, if this is a topic or person that you're not familiar with, then I would suggest you leave the review to a user who might be more qualified in terms of knowledge about Indian cinema/actors. That way he/she could point out the flaws and issues more easily. I don't know, maybe some uninvolved editor at WP:ICTF could be asked to carry the review. At the end of the day, I just want the review to be fair and transparent so that no one would question the article's status in the future. Keivan.fTalk 01:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- But it’s a pretty long article. I know nothing about Indian films and whoever this person is. Just that Keivan has made major contributions to it recently. Regards MSincccc (talk) 12:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Why would I mind? Please go ahead. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krimuk2.0 I know you will not be reviewing the article but would you mind me reviewing it? Regards MSincccc (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I've been one of the most regular contributors on Rai Bachchan's page, and am familiar with Keivan's work on it. But I guess my reviewing it would be a conflict of interest, given my own work on it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I also assume good faith. By the way, one user whom I know very well and with whom I have collaborated had nominated Aishwarya Rai Bachchan's article for GA. Nobody has still taken it up for review. I thought that you could help given you are familiar with articles related to the Hindi film industry. I don't know a thing about that being focused on European (mostly British) articles. Regards MSincccc (talk) 12:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Because beginning a caption with "at" reads poorly. I'm not questioning your intentions here, please don't misunderstand. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Krimuk2.0 Well I was only trying to help. I honestly don't understand why do you want to keep on mentioning "Larson" in the image captions when its clear that we are referring to only her for two reasons:1)The article is her biography and 2) Its an image in which is featured alone. Had it been a group photograph, I would have agreed with you. Regards and good luck with your future endeavours, MSincccc (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Have a look
Have a look at these edits. Substantial removal of content. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- You could have reverted them yourself. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Dwayne Johnson
Please discuss the section heading change at Talk:Dwayne_Johnson#Section_heading. Ravensfire (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Italics
Hi. You raised a good point here and I cannot really argue with that, but I'm sort of stuck between following the manual of style and the examples set by a featured article such as Shah Rukh Khan. In Khan's article for example, the name of the Order of Arts and the Letters is italicized in French, while Padma Shri is not. Should we just remove the italics in both his and Rai Bachchan's articles or should we apply the manual of style strictly? Just asking for an opinion. Keivan.fTalk 14:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) That was a fairly recent edit, it was done here, with an edit summary pointing to MOS:FOREIGNITALIC. Does that apply to awards? I'm not sure, as well how would that apply to Indian awards. MOS:FOREIGN isn't 100% clear either. It's mentioned that a proper name shouldn't be italicized, unless it would be for another reason, with the example given being the title of a book or play. Might be worth a question on the MOS talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire: Thanks for bringing that up. I think their edit actually does follow the manual of style (depending on how you interpret it), but I'm starting to think that the guidelines are a little bit vague. Like what if the name is prevalent enough in English? I guess Padma Shri and the other Indian honours are relatively common terms in Indian English. Another option would be mentioning the French honour (Order of Arts and the Letters) by its English name; after all the other French honour is described as "Legion of Honour" in the case of Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan, so I don't understand why the same cannot be done for this one. If I don't get enough input here then I'll consider a discussion on the MOS talk page. Keivan.fTalk 16:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Legion of Honour is an interesting one as it seems it is generally referred to by the English text - the article is at Legion of Honour (at least here), not at the french text. Even for Ordre des Arts et des Lettres, there's a redirect for Order of Arts and Letters and there are multiple articles that use the English text - Meryl_Streep, Bruce Willis, [2] for more. Inconsistency at it's finest! Yay! The Indian awards don't seem to have a translated-to-english that's normally used - nothing in the article lead or a redirect. I did a search in the MOS talk archives, [3] was interesting. Having said that, Ordre des Arts et des Lettres has it in italics in the article itself, Padma Shri is not. So should we be consistent with the format in the article? Every time I look into something, it seems like I can switch sides. Sorry, not helpful, I know. Ravensfire (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think whatever we choose, we should be consistent across articles. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Krimuk2.0: I hope you don't mind us descending on your talk page :)
- @Ravensfire: My solution would be to use the English name for the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres in both Khan and Rai Bachchan's articles. That eliminates the MOS:FOREIGNITALIC issue and makes it consistent with "Legion of Honour". I'd also say there is no need to keep "Padma Shri" italicised since the phrase is prevalent in Indian English and I don't see italics being used for it in any of the other articles. If you agree on this, I'll make the necessary changes. Keivan.fTalk 19:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Concur with the hope for forbearance!
- Keivan.f - that sounds like a good approach to me. Krimuk2.0, okay with you? Ravensfire (talk) 19:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me too! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think whatever we choose, we should be consistent across articles. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Legion of Honour is an interesting one as it seems it is generally referred to by the English text - the article is at Legion of Honour (at least here), not at the french text. Even for Ordre des Arts et des Lettres, there's a redirect for Order of Arts and Letters and there are multiple articles that use the English text - Meryl_Streep, Bruce Willis, [2] for more. Inconsistency at it's finest! Yay! The Indian awards don't seem to have a translated-to-english that's normally used - nothing in the article lead or a redirect. I did a search in the MOS talk archives, [3] was interesting. Having said that, Ordre des Arts et des Lettres has it in italics in the article itself, Padma Shri is not. So should we be consistent with the format in the article? Every time I look into something, it seems like I can switch sides. Sorry, not helpful, I know. Ravensfire (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire: Thanks for bringing that up. I think their edit actually does follow the manual of style (depending on how you interpret it), but I'm starting to think that the guidelines are a little bit vague. Like what if the name is prevalent enough in English? I guess Padma Shri and the other Indian honours are relatively common terms in Indian English. Another option would be mentioning the French honour (Order of Arts and the Letters) by its English name; after all the other French honour is described as "Legion of Honour" in the case of Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan, so I don't understand why the same cannot be done for this one. If I don't get enough input here then I'll consider a discussion on the MOS talk page. Keivan.fTalk 16:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Solution
Hi Krimuk2.0. Regarding the redirects; I searched each of these terms up before creating a redirect out of them and I would not have gone ahead if I were not getting online results. I honestly don't have the stamina to fight over trivial stuff and I'm sure you have other important things to handle. As I've said before I have no strong feelings about this. Just send me a list of the redirects you think are problematic and I'll ask one of the admins to delete them. That will spare me the stress of handling multiple discussions at the same time. I hope you are not harboring any ill feelings because of this; because as a person who is surrounded by women who have not taken up their husbands' surnames, being "misogyny" would be the last thing I'd want my work to be associated with :) All the best. Keivan.fTalk 19:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- No ill feelings at all and no attack on you or your edits in any way. The "misogyny" comment was also not directed towards you, but towards the general assumption amongst very many Indians (including our journalists) who think that a woman's name should automatically change after her marriage, which I find infuriating. As far as I can see, the ones I've nominated for now are the only ones that exist. I'm sorry for the troubles. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not at all; I'm the one who should be apologizing for creating the headache in the first place. I totally understand and I can assure you that this is not something that happens only in India. My aim has always been to follow the sources, and well, the sources are not always accurate or morally correct. Your argument has been convincing, and I wouldn't mind the redirects getting deleted with the sole exception of Rani Mukerji because she herself has embraced the alternative name at least once. Best of luck in your endeavors. Cheers. Keivan.fTalk 20:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for understanding, Keivan. I really appreciate it. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not at all; I'm the one who should be apologizing for creating the headache in the first place. I totally understand and I can assure you that this is not something that happens only in India. My aim has always been to follow the sources, and well, the sources are not always accurate or morally correct. Your argument has been convincing, and I wouldn't mind the redirects getting deleted with the sole exception of Rani Mukerji because she herself has embraced the alternative name at least once. Best of luck in your endeavors. Cheers. Keivan.fTalk 20:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Pooja Hegde
Hi, if you have time, have a look at these. Apparently, someone agreed to the edit requests put by an apparent sockpuppet [4]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Names
You asked about first names. When writing about a person and their family to distinguish amongst them it's fine and correct to use only the first name. You would see that if you look all over this site. Delectable1 (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
No edit war on Ricard Gadd
Hi Krimuk2.0. I am not engaging in an edit war. I added good faith, well documented, relevant information. I only made one ‘undo’. Is that an edit war? Get a grip! Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 07:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Getting a grip would be not pressing the undo button and not getting offended when someone else does the same. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am referring to your false accusation of an edit war. Try using accurate, disciplined language when communicating with fellow Wikipedians. Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 07:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Try following your own advice please, sir. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am referring to your false accusation of an edit war. Try using accurate, disciplined language when communicating with fellow Wikipedians. Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 07:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard - Taylor Swift Gsgdd (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Prabhas filmography and awards
Have a look at this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Alia Bhatt
- Thank you so much. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Phir Aayi Hasseen Dillruba
Hello @Krimuk2.0, I hope you're doing well. I'm thankful as you improved what's incorrect. I updated it because "here" was not suitable. The only suitable translation is "Beautiful Beloved Came Again". Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Krimuk2.0, the recent change looks good. Can we include "is" word to make it "Beautiful Beloved Is Back"?. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Ranbir Kapoor Filmography
It's making the filmography more better and has all the details regarding ranbir kapoor's filmography Mishradeepanshu027 (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Chandu Champion
Here Can you please mention the discussion where it is mentioned that only BH/BOI figures are to be used for Box office figures. I was not able to find anything on WP:ICTFMOS. Sid95Q (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:ICTFSOURCES based on this discussion. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
deletion of picture
Hello. May I know how am I violating the copyrights? I picture is owned by me and anyone can use it freely. Greatly influenced (talk) 07:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- How is the picture owned by you? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Adding release dates in List of films released by Yash Raj Films
Hello. Can I put back the release date in List of films released by Yash Raj Films? Everything isn't just years, but it needs to be more. Thank you. Akhil K. (talk) 19:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Release dates belong in film's article, not in filmography tables. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please. I've seen Star Studios using release dates, not years. That's an example. Can I put them back, please? Akhil K. (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Kareena Kapoor Khan
Hi Krimuk2.0. I'm confused by your edit and edit summary: [5]. Why did you remove the tag? Why do you believe there needs to be consensus for cleanup tags? --Hipal (talk) 03:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hipal, problems according to whom? The article has gone through an extensive FA review and has been judged by the community as one of the best articles on the site. Sure you can disagree with that, but the onus is on you to gain consensus for adding such a tag on the article talk page by listing proper reasons. Until then, WP:STATUSQUO stays. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
problems according to whom?
What are you suggesting? How is that comment helpful and in line with Wikipedia's behavioral policies?The 2013, FA version looks good.The current, 2024 version has been changed substantially by the over 3000 edits since. It requires considerable cleanup. --Hipal (talk) 18:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)- Asking what problems the article has is not in accordance to Wiki's behavioral policy, but unexplained additions of tags & edit-warring with multiple editors is? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for changing your approach in line with WP:FOC. --Hipal (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- And thank you for changing your approach and finally posting on the article's talk page. I don't agree with some of the points made over there but I'll respond in due course. Keivan.fTalk 01:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for changing your approach in line with WP:FOC. --Hipal (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Asking what problems the article has is not in accordance to Wiki's behavioral policy, but unexplained additions of tags & edit-warring with multiple editors is? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Reception
Hello Krimuk2.0, I hope you're doing well. It's not my area of competence. I'm adding the basic information in the reception section after taking reference from the other editors'creations. You can expand the section (leave it for others). I'm fine with it that you're tagging it for expansion. I'm not doing any vandalism here and I don't have any such intention. You are welcome to open a request for comment and getting a consensus for not including ratings in the reception section. Kindly don't add edit summaries like "please stop". It doesn't look nice at all. If you still have issues with my creation, I'm open to discussing it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- When did I accuse you of vandalism, or even mention your intention? I didn't even say that ratings shouldn't be in the reception section; I said it should be more than just that. There's a big difference. Take the "please stop" as a suggestion to improve instead of finding negativity where there is none. Take care. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't like your edit summary. So I reached out to you. I'm just being honest about my intentions. All edits that I make are in good faith. I value your contribution and take your suggestion positively. I definitely want to improve, but it's not my area of competence. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Clarification on Filmography Edit for Varun Dhawan
I noticed that you undid my edit regarding Varun Dhawan's upcoming film Border 2, stating that films are only added to a filmography once filming starts. However, Border 2 has been officially announced by the makers and Varun Dhawan himself, and this has been covered by almost all major news agencies.
I wanted to understand if there's a specific rule on Wikipedia that requires a film to be in production before it can be added. If so, could you kindly guide me to that rule? Also, I've observed that in other filmographies, films in development or pre-production are included with appropriate notes. How does that align with the guideline you mentioned?
Thank you for your help! SayantanDhara (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- Read WP:FILMOGRAPHY: " Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source." Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
About the revert
Hi @Krimuk2.0, .contributions You should have reverted it to Padri and warned the original editor who changed it. Also, from what I observed, when such a change occurred, you turned a blind eye to it. I didn't understand the reasoning behind that. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have no interest in indulging in your conspiracy theories. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Krimuk2.0 However, reverting a reference point with that reasoning is not transparent because it was only credited as Padri. Additionally, your own edit after that change overlooked the matter. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 07:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Mrunal recent picture addition reverted?
Hi Krimuk,
Greetings. I had added a recent picture of Mrunal to the Mrunal Thakur wiki page. I am not sure why you reverted it. Can you please let me know?
Regards Computeracct (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. The chief purpose of the infobox picture is to identify the subject, and MUST remain stable. Changing her image every few months isn't helpful in identifying her any better, and must be avoided. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Entries removed for confirmed film and awards in Mrunal wiki page?
Hi Krimuk,
Greetings. In the Mrunal wiki page, I had added entry for Mrunal film with Siddhanth Chaturvedi as film name has been confirmed by multiple verifiable sources - 1 schedule of film has already been completed.
I had also added multiple other awards that Mrunal had won. All with proper links.
Also edited intro para since she just won SIIMA Award for Hi Nanna.
Can I know why you have reverted all of these?
Regards Computeracct (talk) 15:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please add information cited by sources that are considered WP:RS at WP:ICTF. Also, some of the other awards that you mentioned such as Onioros Awards, Behindwood awards fail WP:Notability (awards). Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. I will add Tum Hi Ho entry with a better, reliable source.
- About the awards, not sure how they fail Notability criteria (they have been covered by multiple independent sources and independent from the recipient). Also the page itself states that "Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time." Computeracct (talk) 15:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please add information cited by sources that are considered WP:RS at WP:ICTF. Also, some of the other awards that you mentioned such as Onioros Awards, Behindwood awards fail WP:Notability (awards). Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Taylor Russell profile pic
Why was the previous image restored? Many of her fans came to us with complaints saying that her wiki pic doesn’t even resemble her… the lighting is off and some believe it’s been edited… Sharpeye11 (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- We need to respect Wikipedia:Image use policy. Also, we don't cater to fans. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Opinion
You saying something is not an improvement doesn't make it the case. When you are referencing family members it's necessary and indeed proper to use a first name. Delectable1 (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's not the only problem with your edits. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi
Just coming down here to say hi and enquiring on how you're doing, my friend. Hope all is well. I am slowly getting back to active editing and might get back full-time soon. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey buddy. How lovely to hear from you. All's well with me, and I hope you're doing well too. I also hope that you stay for good. We need the good people back! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Congrats on getting Alia Bhatt to FA btw. I have got a pro wrestling related article (Money in the Bank (2018)) up for GA. I was wondering if you could take it up or if you know someone who works on articles related to professional wrestling if you aren't quite familiar with the sport. Thanks. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. As for pro-wrestling, unfortunately, that's an area that's completely out of my skill set. All the best with the article tho. :)) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Veera Narayana has taken up the article so let's see how things go, and thank you once again! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. As for pro-wrestling, unfortunately, that's an area that's completely out of my skill set. All the best with the article tho. :)) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Congrats on getting Alia Bhatt to FA btw. I have got a pro wrestling related article (Money in the Bank (2018)) up for GA. I was wondering if you could take it up or if you know someone who works on articles related to professional wrestling if you aren't quite familiar with the sport. Thanks. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Your Picture
What location is this photo! 77.77.219.127 (talk) 10:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
abusive comment to other editors in comments
Please do not say untrue and abusive comments about previous edits and contributors. Dliesergee (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Photos
Oh, come on am I supposed to always check if it isn't your crop, to not get it brought back a minute afterwards? What was there "creepy"? I made much more cropped photos on commons than you and your crop of De Armas lacked headspace, and should have been done with lossless mode not precise. Unless you use rotation, or low resolution photo, lossless mode is more preferable. And finally, you made second revert of my edit - not me yours, so some scare "you're edit warring" thing would be more appropriate here. Mithoron (talk) 10:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- "am I supposed to always check if it isn't your crop" sounds like *you* want it to be *your* crop that censors a woman's body to *your* liking. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- OMG, "censors a woman's body", you don't know what ;) means? You didn't exactly respond to my objections here, in particular what's so creepy in tighter focus on face? It's a standard headshot photo, there's whole category on commons of them! Here's how I imagine a better version of De Armas & Sweeney photo crop looks like. More headspace, slight rotation to off-set her own tilt of head. Mithoron (talk) 10:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I admit, I do tend to err on the side of too close crop, rather than too loose, because on pl-wiki there's locked height of photo in infobox, but this one wasn't so bad. If you want looser, just say so not make some "creepy", "you're edit warring" or "censors a woman's body" comments Mithoron (talk) 10:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your edit summary literally had a "less boobs" comment. And you still don't seem to understand how that censors a woman's body? God! As I said on the article talk page, would you censor/crop Harry Styles's infobox pic the same way? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Having said that, you're absolutely right about the head tilt, and I've fixed that. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I admit, I do tend to err on the side of too close crop, rather than too loose, because on pl-wiki there's locked height of photo in infobox, but this one wasn't so bad. If you want looser, just say so not make some "creepy", "you're edit warring" or "censors a woman's body" comments Mithoron (talk) 10:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- OMG, "censors a woman's body", you don't know what ;) means? You didn't exactly respond to my objections here, in particular what's so creepy in tighter focus on face? It's a standard headshot photo, there's whole category on commons of them! Here's how I imagine a better version of De Armas & Sweeney photo crop looks like. More headspace, slight rotation to off-set her own tilt of head. Mithoron (talk) 10:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Over thinking
You're trying too hard. It's more confusion for you to say Mescal speaks English and Irish. Like duhhh, of course he speaks English. Stop over thinking. Delectable1 (talk) 19:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
"More unexplained change to picture via sock-puppetry"
What does this mean? You reverted an edit I made to Sydney Sweeney's page and left this note. Fsalis (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Kriti Sanon
@Krimuk2.0, please KINDLY explain why my edit was wrong on Sanon's because clearly I was being too hostile towards you. 19Arham (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)\
- Yes, clearly you are being hostile towards me, not just now but ever since you started contributing here. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- There was no hostility until you began rudely reverting my edits with no explanation except them being ‘mess’. And when I thought we could start afresh with Rashmika’s article and I asked you for help genuinely, you were bitter and said you didn’t want to help me. So thank you. Thank you very much. 19Arham (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I do not want to help hostile people. Respect people's choices. I haven't been contributing to Wiki for over a decade to fawn over your existence. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- There was no hostility until you began rudely reverting my edits with no explanation except them being ‘mess’. And when I thought we could start afresh with Rashmika’s article and I asked you for help genuinely, you were bitter and said you didn’t want to help me. So thank you. Thank you very much. 19Arham (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Apology
Hi @Krimuk2.0, due to recent events I would like to sincerely apologise for my behaviour towards you. My attitude was inexcusable and I would like to take this time to tell you that I will ensure to be more respectful and mindful of how I treat you as you were only doing what was best for the article. This is not solely because of the fact that you were proven right on the matter of Sanon’s article but because, after some light introspection, you were right. I know it is been years that we’ve been going back and forth like this but I genuinely would like to start afresh. Sorry again and thank you for your contributions.
- Arham 19Arham (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I appreciate it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason of marking external link as Spam
Hello Sir / Madam,
I had added an external link for movie Meiyazhagan. I have noted that you have reverted this and marked my change as spam. May I check why this should be considered a spam.
I understand RecoBee is a new website but i dont think it would be consdiered a spam.
Link with diff is below https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meiyazhagan&diff=prev&oldid=1251666974
Also adding RecoBee page for Meiyazhagan https://www.reco-bee.com/movie/393284
Regards Ankit Ankitg118 (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Gal Gadot
I've noticed that you revert my edits and refer to them as messy. Can you explain why? Like how is it a "mess"! Lililolol (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- what's the point of duplicating her credits in her bio multiple times, when the same info exists in her career section and a separate filmography page. Also, WP:ROLEBIO applies when mentioning her occupation in lead and infobox. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- This isn’t unnecessary duplication. According to Good Article criteria, a filmography section should highlight an actor’s most notable roles, which is exactly what I’ve done for Gal Gadot. Like when you look at any actor’s filmography, you’ll typically see their key roles emphasized there.
Lililolol (talk) 19:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Try reading any FA instead of edit-warring and further ignoring WP:ROLEBIO. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Nolan's Casting
Your mentioned reason not to update casting status makes no sense. Those tend to be major developments, and if not then go ahead and take down the lines about Tom Holland and Damon too. Also, it's in the career section, not "bio". Baptiste6888 (talk) 08:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Do you see casting announcements, or even extended cast listings, of Nolan's previous films in his "career section"? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Those films are finished works belonging to the past. You're free to trim the paragraph on the upcoming film once we know enough to write up its own page. For now, consider that people might be returning to Nolan's page simply to keep abreast of all major news about it. And major news is indeed what my edit was. Baptiste6888 (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I think it qualifies as RS because it is owned by HT Media. Where do we discuss this? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Their "journalism" quality is pretty poor tbh. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Kailash29792, Desimartini is owned by the Hindustan Times group (HMVL) and operated by its HT Digital stream (HTDS) division. To remove it because you consider it's journalism poor is not a reason and you need to prove it with consensus. Poor source is where no significant coverage can be found but it does not mean that the source itself is unreliable. Amar Ujala is one of India’s leading Hindi newspapers with 22 editions in 179 districts in 6 states and 2 union territories. This source and Desi Martini are not poor but sufficient and reliable for film coverages. Please do not remove sources calling it "poor". Please let us get consensus before removing it. We also have WP:ICTFSOURCES talk page where you can raise your opinion. RangersRus (talk) 12:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:BRD the onus is on you to prove its reliability. Simply being "leading" and "owned" by a group that publishes other noteworthy news doesn't make these reliable. Remember, Daily Mail and TMZ are both widely read. Doesn't make them reliable for Wikipedia. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Kailash29792, Desimartini is owned by the Hindustan Times group (HMVL) and operated by its HT Digital stream (HTDS) division. To remove it because you consider it's journalism poor is not a reason and you need to prove it with consensus. Poor source is where no significant coverage can be found but it does not mean that the source itself is unreliable. Amar Ujala is one of India’s leading Hindi newspapers with 22 editions in 179 districts in 6 states and 2 union territories. This source and Desi Martini are not poor but sufficient and reliable for film coverages. Please do not remove sources calling it "poor". Please let us get consensus before removing it. We also have WP:ICTFSOURCES talk page where you can raise your opinion. RangersRus (talk) 12:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Simply reverting
Why are you reverting my edits which have WP:NEWSORGINDIA references? Thesanas (talk) 06:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Because you're a WP:SOCK. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just here to make this a GA. Please help me to promote to GA, without just reverting all my and other editors edits. Thesanas (talk) 06:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Margot Robbie
Greetings! Is Margot Robbie's baby birth source reliable? Can you check it out? M.lebedev (talk) 12:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I don't mind adding it, but I think some others might disagree. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that I'm writing a week later, but SNUGGUMS has sorted out the situation. Thanks! M.lebedev (talk) 15:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)