User talk:Krecolee

June 2019

Hi, sorry to bother; I'm A lad insane. I just wanted to let you know that the article you edited is a disambiguation: this means that its purpose is to differentiate the articles of several people with the same name. The information for any one specific person should go in the appropriate sub-article. Thanks, -A lad insane (Channel 2) 18:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi. The information for any one specific person should go in the appropriate sub-article. So how could Insert from Kerstin Recolé Brookins the singer ? Krecolee (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, you could always make an article for her. Check out WP:YFA. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 00:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing by your username that you are Kerstin Recolé Brookins. There are strict guidelines about how to edit about yourself on Wikipedia - please see WP:COI and WP:Autobiography. If you want to write an article about yourself, you need to declare your conflict of interest and submit the article through the Articles for Creation process. And please stop replacing the disambiguation page on Kerstin with content about yourself - this is considered disruptive editing and you could get blocked if you continue to do this. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerstin (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kerstin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kerstin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krecolee! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 20:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]