User talk:Kolbasz/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kolbasz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Deletion of the page Jellysharks
Jellysharks are real animals. there is scientific proof that they exist. Please dont delete our page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jellysharktime (talk • contribs) 11:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of page Dagban yuya
i understand i had to try out creating this article in my sandbox first before putting it out. can u make it available to me so i can work on it in my sandbox. thanks Masssly (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- Not a Wikipedia administrator, sorry. I only placed the nomination tag and notification. But see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Kolbasz (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: BllankWall
Hello Kolbasz. I am just letting you know that I deleted BllankWall, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK 11:57, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, can you clarify the changes required to remove the Advert tags? - RoyBoy 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
WHY THE HELL MY PAGE SHALL BE DELETED ?
I have given strong reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by MurtazaYousuf (talk • contribs) 19:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
You are really good , but this time Lightning Dhyanu is a very useful page for public.He had a great hidden contribution in changing this world. Lightning Dhyanu (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC) |
Horseman
Page is not being vandalized, page was created by friend regarding horseman legend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leetmero (talk • contribs) 21:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Things made up one day + page blanking = vandalism. Kolbasz (talk) 22:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Joerg Platzer
Hi. I'm just getting this page going here. It's been a good long while since I created a WikiPedia page. In light of the three media references now included, could you please retract the template? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeGogulski (talk • contribs) 23:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Declined BLPPROD: Ariminthea Rocker Bloodworth
Unfortunately, our policies prohibit the placement of a BLPPROD even when the only source in an article is a self-published blog. Silly policy, but you'll have to go with PROD or AfD here. My apologies. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. (And I see now that there's been some debate on the wording on the template...) Kolbasz (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Well these vandals think they're funny don't they?
There's an SPI down on these Karen Gillan vandals now. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SmillanIsCanon. Mind chipping in anything i've missed? MM (Report findings) (Past espionage) 16:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry about the belated answer - been busy and haven't had time for my talk page. Even though it didn't get a result back then, thanks for launching the investigation! That bunch was unusually annoying. Oh, and I think you got all the sockpuppets in your submission. :) Kolbasz (talk) 16:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Conflict of interest - Answer
Hi, I tried to include only facts and no opinions on the company or its games. Please, tell me if that is not the case or if you spot a non neutral concept ... Correction, actually, there was a number of downloads for which I didn't provided a reference, I just edited it. - User talk:Awoywood 21 Agugust 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 21:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Kolbasz, Thank you for your notice. I understand the situation. I've never moved page before, and never tried to do such a cut-and-paste move before. Now I understand how it should be done. Previously, I explained at the article talk page that a renaming was in order, I just didn't know how to do it. Thanks again. Y-barton (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Parco delle Cascine
It's a translation from Italian in progress: I will add reference when the translation is complete, but thanks for notifying :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bheton (talk • contribs) 16:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Check. In the future, you might want to tag the page with |{{under construction}} or {{new page}}} at creation, to let reviewers know that you're not done creating the article. Or even better, you can use your user sandbox to flesh out the article before submitting it. Also for future reference: I noticed that you had originally created the article as Parco delle cascine before blanking it and recreating it as Parco delle Cascine. In the future you can and should move pages if you accidentally create them with the wrong title, rather than blanking the old page and starting a new one. This preserves the article's edit history. In this case, I added a redirect from the old article to the new. Kolbasz (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for your feedback! --Bheton (talk) 13:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi , brother
If you any see any mistake on it i will change it.
But , brother it is a true story based on magazine that is written on our magazine (the heirs of raisina ).
If you want to see the prooks you can talk me Sajjan singh +919416423889 Email Id -malchakls@gmail.com , malchakls@ymail.com
Or you can give me your mobile.no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajjansingh11 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nutrient agar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass concentration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
4 benzyloxy phenol
Hi you tagged 4 benzyloxy phenol as a copyvio, but it was copying a US government source, which was Public Domain. Be altert for sites ending in .gov, go the the home page and check the copyright statement (not all are public domain) This one is PD http://www.nlm.nih.gov/copyright.html. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- In this case, it isn't the work of a US government source, but copyrighted to Truven Health Analytics Inc. As can be seen in the very copied article itself. Kolbasz (talk) 11:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Barium may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- and hydrogen, are generally exothermic and proceed upon heating.<ref name="Ullman2005" />|pp=2–3}} Reactions with water and alcohols are also very exothermic and release hydrogen gas:<ref name="
- reduce leaks of X-rays from [[cathode ray tubes]] (CRT) TV sets.<ref name="Ullman2005" />|pp=12–13}}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
business life
Thanks for noticing these articles; I think you missed the fact that they are also copyvio from the newspaper itself, and the other sources used, (This is actually fairly common for promotional articles that read fairly coherently, & I check it every time.) I have deleted the articles and will try to explain. DGG ( talk ) 16:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
request to remove speedy deletion
hello Kolbaz, thank you very much for noticing the write up for Ventures Middle East. But I would like to request for the removal of speedy deletion as the article information are based on facts. I am still trying to add reliable references and webpages that proves those facts. I would require an ample time to finalize the link of sources but rest assured I will be working on it. I am hoping for your consideration for my request of removal the deletion tag. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirstenchloe (talk • contribs) 16:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Make your case on the article's talk page. The administrator who reviews the speedy deletion tag looks at the talk page as well as the article before deciding on whether to delete or not. Kolbasz (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
A little less zealous please
Can you please resist your impulse to immediately edit the page entitled 'The Layer monument' until completed. Some of us have been contributing to Wikipedia for over ten years and find it rather tiresome to have one's own original contributions tweaked before completion. Norwikian (talk) 11:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you don't want that, you should consider tweaking your original contributions yourself in your user sandbox before submitting the article to the main namespace. Kolbasz (talk) 12:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- What exactly do you consider your contribution to the article Little Ferry Yard to be? Djflem (talk)
- Marking it as patrolled and tagging it as an orphan and uncategorized. Kolbasz (talk) 23:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
- What exactly do you consider your contribution to the article Little Ferry Yard to be? Djflem (talk)
Pls dont delete Hotel The Grand Dragon Ladakh
I am not here to promote any company, product or any specific brand i am based in ladakh and i want to contribute to my region ladakh while creating or editing context of ladakh and its special attractions and hence Hotel The Grand Dragon ladakh is one of finest example of hospitality which our regions offer and it should be on Wikipedia,as since more then 5 years it is serving finestly all the digneteries all over the globe.. as you can see my previous contribution within our region ladakh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahangir Niyaz (talk • contribs) 17:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not a Wikipedia administrator. Contest the deletion on the article's talk page. The administrator who reviews the proposed speedy deletion will consider your arguments. Kolbasz (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Redirect Solecismus
You know I forgot about redirecting as a possibility - I considered merge..and csd since it existed already - I shall remember redirects in future. Thanks (PS once I saw your plan I went to remove the tag but you beat me to it!)-- 🍺 Antiqueight confer 20:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Over-the-counter data
Hi, Kolbasz. I just submitted a page for "Over-the-counter data" and you noted it was COI. I can see why you thought that based on my connection with the topic, but I read Wikipedia's definition of COI (contributing to Wikipedia to promote your own interests, including your business or financial interests, or those of your external relationships, such as with family, friends or employers) and wanted to assure you none of these things apply to me (I don't even have a business - the website I host simply communicates the research). I am just a researcher who's concept is now being used by others (e.g., Metro Public Schools in Nashville is now applying the OTCD research and standards, Illuminate Education is now applying the OTCD research and standards, etc. and I am not involved or profiting from any of it... I just happened to do some research on a topic, which produced results that can significantly help students (I downplayed this in the Wikipedia entry so the piece would appear neutral, but the actual findings mean tremendous benefit to the students currently being hurt by faulty data use). This page does not in any way promote my own interests (including business or financial interests, of which I have none), and it does not in any way promote my external relationships (such as with family, friends or employers). It would be fine to even remove the mention of me as the concept's creator. The main purpose is to have this summary available so people can see its correct description when other people reference over-the-counter data. Thank you very much for your time and assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenny Rankin (talk • contribs) 21:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to step on your toes there. I reverted to 01:55, 19 October 2013 MelbourneStar. Please fix things as you see fit.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Just... why would you do that reversion? You reverted to a version with spammy/inappropriate/dead links. The reason I manually reverted the spam/copyvio was just to avoid that. Kolbasz (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry. I reverted to the wrong version. A thousand pardons. Too many tabs open and I got the wrong one, I think. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
It's a pleasure watching you clean up seperate-->separate this morning! --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 14:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Micro-X-ray fluorescence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fingerprints (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
Thanks for getting me started! I'll heed your advice for future articles! Gangnie (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
DYK for Stekenjokk
On 5 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stekenjokk, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Stekenjokk holds the Swedish record for wind speed, with 170 km/h (110 mph) recorded during Cyclone Hilde on 16 November 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stekenjokk. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Smith & Wesson Model CS45
Hello Kolbasz. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Smith & Wesson Model CS45, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Vibroacoustic Therapy is not a Fringe Theory
- "Contemporary Vibroacoustic Therapy: Perspectives on Clinical Practice, Research, and Training Marko Pukanen and Esa Ala-Ruona. Music and Medicine 2012 4:128,originally published online 17 May 2012"
Abstract Vibroacoustic therapy (VAT) traditionally considered to be a physical and receptive type of music therapy intervention, uses pulsed, sinusoidal, low-frequency sound on a specially designed bed or chair. Today VAT is viewed as a multimodal approach, whereby the therapist works with the client’s physiological and psychological experiences, incorporating a mind–body approach. This article provides current knowledge in clinical practice emphasizing the systematic and documented implementations of VAT. This includes presentation and explication of the key elements of VAT, assessments, treatment plans and procedures, documentation, and evaluation of the treatment with recommendations for follow-up care in health and rehabilitation. Recent research is presented, and directions for future research are considered. Applicable views on clinical training and required competencies are outlined.
- Bergström-Isacsson, M. (2001). Musik och Rett syndrome - en musikterapeutisk tolkning. Unpublished Bachelor, Royal College of Music, Stockholm.
- Bergström-Isacsson, M. (2005). Musik och Vibroakustik vid Rett syndrom, en undersökning av autonoma responser. Royal College of Music, Stockholm.
- Bergström-Isacsson, M., Julu, P. O. O., & Witt Engerström, I. (2007). Autonomic responses to Music and Vibroacoustic Therapy in Rett Syndrome. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 16(1), 42-59.
- Bergström-Isacsson, Märith (2011): Music and Vibroacoustic Stimulation in People with Rett Syndrome- A Neurophysiological Study. Doctoral Thesis. Aalborg University, Denmark and Rett Center, Sweden.
Here are relevant literature examples from my own library
- Music Vibration Edited by Tony Wigram and Cheryl Dileo in 1997. Jeffrey books, 538 Covered Bridge Rd, Cherry Hill, NJ, 08034.
- Stress- kui sümmetriline seisund. By Aili Paju and Riina Raudsik (in Estonian) ISBN 978-9985-64-358-7 Maalche Raamat.
- Cheryl Dileo (ed) Music Therapy. International perspectives-Jeffrey Books, 5451 Downs Run, Pipersville, Pennsylvania 18947 (1993)
- Angst, Schmertz, Musik in der Anästhesie. Herausg. R. Droun und R. Spintge. Editioner "Roche" ISBN 3-88878-009-X Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum 1983
- Music Medicine, ed.: Ralph Spintge and Roland Droh. MMB Music, Inc. ISBN 0-918812-72-0 1992
- Music in der Medizin , ed. R. Spintge , R. Droh. Springer.Verlag ISBN 3-540-17265-3, ISBN 0-387-17265-3. 1983 and 1985
- Schmertz und Sport. Ed: r. Spintge, R. Droh. Springer-Verlag ISBN 0-387-18862-4 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum. 1988
- MusicMedicine, Volume 2, Rosalie Rebollo Pratt EdD., Ralph Spintge M.D. (eds) MMB Music. Inc. ISBN 0-918812-89-5 199
- Olav Skille: Il suona a bassa frequenza nella terapia musicale (a cura di Silvio Luigi Feliciani & Chiara Magni)
- ISBN 978-88-548-3603-7 Aracne Editrice 2010.
- And- of course,- there is Tony Wigram's PhD thesis on Vibroacoustic therapy. You find it on Internet.
- Märith Bergström-Isacsson at Rett cender also has got her PhD on VAT
-- Cyrinus (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
would you mind
terribly notifying article creators of tagging articles for deletion? Dlohcierekim 15:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
What
is this BenYes? 01:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- A couple of more levels on the vandal-o-meter? :) Kolbasz (talk) 11:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy Tags Above
The above were all tagged by yourself as "should be SVG" - however, they are all located on commons (not en-wiki), therefore you became the "creator" and got the messages - all the en-wiki bits have now been deleted. You will have to go to commons to tag them. For info the template on commons is called Template:Convert to SVG Ronhjones (Talk) 17:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Renaissance Institute
I was just wondering during tagging and editing that article as the content given in the article is some what copied from external websites I hope. When I reviewed it and looks like the author tried to promote his article. Since I have limited editing buttons so I couldn't nominate it for speedy deletion. Thanks you for Nominating it as speedy deletion. Nechlison (talk) 13:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- The templates are all listed under their respective deletion criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, so you can always type them in manually (which is what I do). Kolbasz (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
User making violation
Hello there. I am editor Nechlison , a user with the name Canadalovesnd(talk) is making violations and removing every tag when we editors review his recently created pages such as [1]. Some of his pages/articles are already deleted by other editors. Can you please respond to this user ? Thanks Nechlison (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
-- I deleted your tag the first time because you made some weird changes to [2] the which put two info-boxes into the article, and something unfamiliar and abnormal with the external links listing. Second time was just an accident. Canadalovesnd(talk) 13:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC) I've gone through your contribution and watchlist. your previous articles related to football game are deleted by other users and you were recreating them repeatedly. Your current article contains some copyrighted material also. So please avoid doing this again and again. See WP:CV also. Nechlison (talk) 14:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Y'all are aware that I'm just a regular editor and not an administrator, right? :) Kolbasz (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Probably best to wait more than a minute after creation before tagging a page for speedy deletion... CMAH (Connormah's Sock) 16:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- The moment an article enters the main namespace, it's up for speedy deletion if it falls afoul of any of the CSD criteria. This is what sandboxes and AfC are for. Kolbasz (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- That may be, but I find it to be more of a courtesy thing to not automatically tag any page one minute after creation. WP:AGF, no need to be too trigger happy... CMAH (Connormah's Sock) 16:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)